dagblog - Comments for "How Trump Will Rebrand His Way To The Truth" http://dagblog.com/how-trump-will-rebrand-his-way-truth-21407 Comments for "How Trump Will Rebrand His Way To The Truth" en Brand changing is absolutely http://dagblog.com/comment/230794#comment-230794 <a id="comment-230794"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/how-trump-will-rebrand-his-way-truth-21407">How Trump Will Rebrand His Way To The Truth</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Brand changing is absolutely nice solution to improve biz. Businessman can use up definite special services (for example, <a href="https://www.logaster.com/envelope/">https://www.logaster.com/envelope/</a> ). It will necessarily aid each man with all or at least main part of graphic component.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 24 Nov 2016 13:00:44 +0000 MartinHH comment 230794 at http://dagblog.com Sure--this whole Presidential http://dagblog.com/comment/230760#comment-230760 <a id="comment-230760"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/230677#comment-230677">Hey... the Trumps and the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Sure--this whole Presidential run was Bill's idea (there's a famous phone call.)</p> <p> </p> <p>It will go on the induction scroll when Bill is voted into the Political Unforced Error Hall of Fame--right above the part where they cite his exemplary modeling  of a foot-shooter in knocking on Loretta Lynch's cabin door (and not in the woods,, and not in a good way).</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 22 Nov 2016 01:40:49 +0000 jollyroger comment 230760 at http://dagblog.com Hey... the Trumps and the http://dagblog.com/comment/230677#comment-230677 <a id="comment-230677"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/230676#comment-230676">Parenthetically, and while we</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hey... the Trumps and the Clintons used to be pals, remember.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 19 Nov 2016 02:48:35 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 230677 at http://dagblog.com Parenthetically, and while we http://dagblog.com/comment/230676#comment-230676 <a id="comment-230676"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/230674#comment-230674">Yep, he&#039;ll spin this as his</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Parenthetically, and while we're on the subject of settling litigation in order not to burden the presidency, if a certain president (also reputed to grab'em, conicidentally) had settled his litigation (all it was gonna cost him was an "I'm sorry, Paula I was a jerk...) before it turned into the Night of A Thousand Cigars...</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 19 Nov 2016 02:41:08 +0000 jollyroger comment 230676 at http://dagblog.com Yep, he'll spin this as his http://dagblog.com/comment/230674#comment-230674 <a id="comment-230674"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/230671#comment-230671">Remember this kinda thing at</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yep, he'll spin this as his willingness to pay out a (tax deductible!) $25 million to people who don't deserve it because he just had to spare America the trouble of having a president worried about a civil trial.  And people will believe it and the press will pay more attention to that part of the story than to the... thousands of innocent people he swindled into paying for fake college degrees.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 19 Nov 2016 01:25:48 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 230674 at http://dagblog.com Cue  Mike P ence..."My heart http://dagblog.com/comment/230672#comment-230672 <a id="comment-230672"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/230671#comment-230671">Remember this kinda thing at</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Cue  Mike P ence..."My heart breaks, it breaks, to see this goooood man, who is humbling himself for the good of domestic tranquility, making him  a virtual martyr to the Constitution (which was given, I remind you, by God on Mt. Sinai to the assembled founding fathers), who is surrenduring to the most vile extortion, solely to end a distracting nuisance, and yet we see haters, (haters without shoes!) trying to bring him down for his selfless choice"</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 18 Nov 2016 23:01:37 +0000 jollyroger comment 230672 at http://dagblog.com Remember this kinda thing at http://dagblog.com/comment/230671#comment-230671 <a id="comment-230671"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/how-trump-will-rebrand-his-way-truth-21407">How Trump Will Rebrand His Way To The Truth</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Remember this kinda thing at a rally or dozen?</p> <p>“I could have settled this case numerous times, but I don’t want to settle cases when we’re right. I don’t believe in it. And when you start settling cases, you know what happens? Everybody sues you because you get known as a settler. One thing about me, I am not known as a settler,” Trump said at the time.</p> <p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/11/18/reports-trump-nears-settlement-trump-u-fraud-case/94068946/">Ummm, yeah, he sorta is</a>.  But with a bit of rebranding, it will become yet another example of how he took care of a pesky lawsuit brought by sad, jealous liars without ever admitting wrongdoing.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 18 Nov 2016 22:13:13 +0000 barefooted comment 230671 at http://dagblog.com The left played the Crooked http://dagblog.com/comment/230670#comment-230670 <a id="comment-230670"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/230668#comment-230668">Why do we let Republicans</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The left played the Crooked Hillary card long before Trump got to it. Even all that disgusting NY Times et al raking the Clinton Foundation over the coals, while Trump can actually break laws and no one cares - it's just Hillary's appearances that matter. Look, Trump's nominating the guy who mishandled classified info as Secretary of State - koinkydink?</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 18 Nov 2016 21:49:17 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 230670 at http://dagblog.com Yes, we have to learn to http://dagblog.com/comment/230669#comment-230669 <a id="comment-230669"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/230668#comment-230668">Why do we let Republicans</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yes, we have to learn to fight better.  And, we're dealing with a total Svengali here. For months, on the crooked Hillary front, he has had crowds chanting "lock her up!"  Presumably, the people yelling believed she should be investigated and jailed, right?  Then he wins and says, "The Clintons are good people, we don't want to hurt them."  How do his followers react?  As if he is now a wise and merciful ruler.</p> <p>Look, I don't want to say anything beyond the pale here, but I'm pretty sure we're dealing with Satan.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 18 Nov 2016 21:41:55 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 230669 at http://dagblog.com Why do we let Republicans http://dagblog.com/comment/230668#comment-230668 <a id="comment-230668"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/how-trump-will-rebrand-his-way-truth-21407">How Trump Will Rebrand His Way To The Truth</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Why do we let Republicans brand "Crooked Hillary," while everything he says is a lie?  When we say that something is wrong it gets called "The Blame Game."  Hillary had more ideas and the wherewithal to accomplish TRUE CHANGE and yet she was branded the ESTABLISHMENT (which by definition she was, but the moniker indicated something different. You get the idea.</p> <p><span style="font-size:18px">So why do we lay down and accept the term, "Privatize Medicare."  Ryan and his hyenas want to <strong><u>KILL Medicare</u></strong>, which happens to be the most efficient delivery system of health care we have in this country!</span></p> <p>We have got to learn to fight better.  Privatizing, if you are an uninformed citizen means something like "nobody can find out about your medical stuff;". Besides, Private HAS to be better than PUBLIC, no?  </p> <p>How about ads, or even simply viral videos showing a tremorous, almost sightless 85 year-old, trying to find his voucher, and getting the run-around when trying to find the best insurance company for him/her.  It should end with a screen shot on the codger's TV showing a smirking Paul Ryan talking about how bad Medicare is.</p> <p>This is not even hyperbole.  It is TRUE!  </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 18 Nov 2016 21:06:03 +0000 CVille Dem comment 230668 at http://dagblog.com