dagblog - Comments for " THOM TILLIS REMINDS JAMES CLAPPER THAT THE US TAMPERS IN ELECTIONS, TOO" http://dagblog.com/link/thom-tillis-reminds-james-clapper-us-tampers-elections-too-21672 Comments for " THOM TILLIS REMINDS JAMES CLAPPER THAT THE US TAMPERS IN ELECTIONS, TOO" en Bundy is known to have raped http://dagblog.com/comment/232290#comment-232290 <a id="comment-232290"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232285#comment-232285">Thanks OGD. &#039;Lulu&#039;s </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Bundy is known to have raped and dismembered at least thirty women. At his trial though, we should ignore his confessions of rape and dismemberment because he is a homicidal maniac. Brilliant!</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 07 Jan 2017 13:41:09 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 232290 at http://dagblog.com Thanks OGD. 'Lulu's http://dagblog.com/comment/232285#comment-232285 <a id="comment-232285"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232272#comment-232272">NCD... Thanks...</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks OGD. 'Lulu's 'messenger of the moment' on democracy, Tillis, is like citing <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Bundy">Ted Bundy</a> as 'messenger of the moment' for gentlemanly dating etiquette.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 07 Jan 2017 05:05:13 +0000 NCD comment 232285 at http://dagblog.com Simple science can be http://dagblog.com/comment/232284#comment-232284 <a id="comment-232284"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232283#comment-232283">Sheesh Lulu ...</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Simple science can be explained in simple English. </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 07 Jan 2017 04:16:52 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 232284 at http://dagblog.com Sheesh Lulu ... http://dagblog.com/comment/232283#comment-232283 <a id="comment-232283"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232282#comment-232282">Sorry OGD, I just don&#039;t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em><strong>Sheesh </strong></em><strong>Lulu</strong><em><strong> ...</strong></em></p> <p>This isn't rocket science we're dealing with...</p> <p><img alt="" height="239" src="http://rs818.pbsrc.com/albums/zz102/magicspoon/Mind%20Blown/huhmindequalsblown_zps9cc955ee.gif~c200" width="239" /></p> <p> </p> <p>~OGD~</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 07 Jan 2017 04:08:20 +0000 oldenGoldenDecoy comment 232283 at http://dagblog.com Look LuLu . . . http://dagblog.com/comment/232274#comment-232274 <a id="comment-232274"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232269#comment-232269">I agree, no and yes, but I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em><strong>Look LuLu . . .</strong></em></p> <p>While all this crap about the past is being bantered about, the CURRENT ISSUE that is being buried is found in the following post here at Dag.</p> <p><a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/adversary-we-know-versus-unknown-adversary-21677">The Adversary We Know versus the Unknown Adversary</a></p> <p>~OGD~</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 07 Jan 2017 03:59:44 +0000 oldenGoldenDecoy comment 232274 at http://dagblog.com Sorry OGD, I just don't http://dagblog.com/comment/232282#comment-232282 <a id="comment-232282"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232274#comment-232274">Look LuLu . . .</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Sorry OGD, I just don't understand your question or known where you are coming from or what your evidence represents or something. I don't know how to respond. I'll look again tomorrow, maybe with a clearer head.  </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 07 Jan 2017 03:44:18 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 232282 at http://dagblog.com NCD... Thanks... http://dagblog.com/comment/232272#comment-232272 <a id="comment-232272"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232264#comment-232264">Did Tillis (R-NC) mention the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><strong>NCD... <em>Thanks...</em></strong></p> <blockquote> <p><em><span style="font-size:20px">"....the ever powerful and uncompromising holier than thou 'democracy spreading' everywhere but the USA right wing supported each and every one of these operations..." </span></em></p> </blockquote> <p><span style="font-size:13px">~OGD~</span></p> </div></div></div> Sat, 07 Jan 2017 01:44:29 +0000 oldenGoldenDecoy comment 232272 at http://dagblog.com The Republican Congress can http://dagblog.com/comment/232271#comment-232271 <a id="comment-232271"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232269#comment-232269">I agree, no and yes, but I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The Republican Congress can easily deflect intelligence actions in foreign governments as a necessity for our safety. The Democrats can make a dent in intervention by starting with the fact that the Republicans show no desire to hold Congressional hearing on the actions of Russia in the election. Trump tweeted that he wanted a Congressional investigation into the hack report being leaked to NBC rather than investigating the actual Russian hack. Attacking the role of Republicans as useful idiots and putting US security at risk is the best way to next move into the wisdom of our attacking elections in other countries.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 07 Jan 2017 01:30:15 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 232271 at http://dagblog.com I agree, no and yes, but I http://dagblog.com/comment/232269#comment-232269 <a id="comment-232269"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232268#comment-232268">I know the question was not</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I agree, no and yes, but I believe it is a mistake of missing the point to concentrate on Tillis being the messenger of the moment. Both parties, and therefore the entire electorate bear whatever responsibility there is for many years now. </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 07 Jan 2017 00:30:11 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 232269 at http://dagblog.com I know the question was not http://dagblog.com/comment/232268#comment-232268 <a id="comment-232268"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232266#comment-232266">Do you believe that Tillis</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I know the question was not addressed to me, but it seems obvious that he was running interference for trump/putin.  If he had made that statement when we were getting ready to invade Iraq it might be noted for its great statesmanship.  However, he didn't bring this up then, nor did anyone else.  </p> <p>The points he made (that the US has tampered with many governments, all with the cover of "bringing democracy") are legitimate...the problem is that he doesn't really mean it.  He doesn't even know what he means. He is just doing trump's bidding.</p> <p>So to answer to your question:</p> <blockquote> <p>Do you believe that Tillis and the GOP care about democracy, or just winning?</p> </blockquote> <p>I say, NO, and YES (at any cost)</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 07 Jan 2017 00:02:26 +0000 CVille Dem comment 232268 at http://dagblog.com