dagblog - Comments for "Selfish Loser Dems" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/selfish-loser-dems-21723 Comments for "Selfish Loser Dems" en (No subject) http://dagblog.com/comment/232669#comment-232669 <a id="comment-232669"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232668#comment-232668">Thanks Hal, much appreciated.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><img alt="yes" height="23" src="http://cdn.ckeditor.com/4.5.6/full-all/plugins/smiley/images/thumbs_up.png" title="yes" width="23" /><img alt="smiley" height="23" src="http://cdn.ckeditor.com/4.5.6/full-all/plugins/smiley/images/regular_smile.png" title="smiley" width="23" /></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 19 Jan 2017 22:00:30 +0000 HSG comment 232669 at http://dagblog.com Thanks Hal, much appreciated. http://dagblog.com/comment/232668#comment-232668 <a id="comment-232668"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232667#comment-232667">I think identity politics</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks Hal, much appreciated.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 19 Jan 2017 20:01:12 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 232668 at http://dagblog.com I think identity politics http://dagblog.com/comment/232667#comment-232667 <a id="comment-232667"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232660#comment-232660">Hal, I know.  It is hard for</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think identity politics have an important place momoe.  I don't think we can or should expect African-Americans or women or other groups that have in the past suffered or continue to suffer discrimination to disregard the specific concerns of their community within our broader American community.  As progressives, we need to make the point over and over that the interests of the working class - white, black, Asian, Latino, mixed - generally align with the more specific interests of women, people of color, LGBQT.  So if you are voting primarily based on your identity as a person of color or a woman (or an environmentalist) or whatever you see as your identity, you will most likely be best served by the candidate who champions reduced economic inequality through higher taxes on the rich, good jobs for working-class people, universal single-payer healthcare, truly affordable education, fair as opposed to "free" trade, etc.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 19 Jan 2017 19:44:05 +0000 HSG comment 232667 at http://dagblog.com I think a lot of people don't http://dagblog.com/comment/232666#comment-232666 <a id="comment-232666"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232665#comment-232665">Hmmm, most of my issues aren</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think a lot of people don't see their issues on the ballot,but vote for the person and party they feel are the most likely to do the right thing in a general sense. Some Progressives latch on to the wingnut meme of identity politics to attack other Progressives. If the wingnuts create an insane law to address a nonexistent problem about transgender people using restrooms, do we ignore the attack? If wingnuts try to suppress votes in a way that impacts mostly minority groups do we ignore the assault because it is identity politics? How do we address a group of voters who elect Governors who refuse to accept Obamacare/ACA and destroy unions despite benefiting from healthcare and wages fought for by unions?</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 19 Jan 2017 19:24:31 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 232666 at http://dagblog.com Hmmm, most of my issues aren http://dagblog.com/comment/232665#comment-232665 <a id="comment-232665"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232661#comment-232661">If only millennials voted,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hmmm, most of my issues aren't on the ballot - can't imagine how they'd vote on them. Maybe in a special category called "baggage".</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 19 Jan 2017 18:38:22 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 232665 at http://dagblog.com Thanks.  Tmac.  I don't find http://dagblog.com/comment/232663#comment-232663 <a id="comment-232663"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232642#comment-232642">Yeah, I still think you&#039;re</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks.  Tmac.  I don't find this comment to be off-topic.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 19 Jan 2017 17:42:37 +0000 HSG comment 232663 at http://dagblog.com Yep. Exactly. http://dagblog.com/comment/232662#comment-232662 <a id="comment-232662"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232650#comment-232650">They should have learned that</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yep. Exactly.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 19 Jan 2017 17:14:05 +0000 tmccarthy0 comment 232662 at http://dagblog.com If only millennials voted, http://dagblog.com/comment/232661#comment-232661 <a id="comment-232661"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232660#comment-232660">Hal, I know.  It is hard for</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>If only millennials voted, Hillary would have whooped Trump. Is it not identity politics when white voters vote their issues?</p> <p>Young voters</p> <p><a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-11-09/what-this-election-taught-us-about-millennial-voters">https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-11-09/what-this-election-ta...</a></p> <p>The identity politics meme</p> <p><a href="http://theweek.com/speedreads/667002/samantha-bee-asks-why-democrats-are-borrowing-identity-politics-talking-points-from-fox-news">http://theweek.com/speedreads/667002/samantha-bee-asks-why-democrats-are...</a></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 19 Jan 2017 16:57:50 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 232661 at http://dagblog.com Hal, I know.  It is hard for http://dagblog.com/comment/232660#comment-232660 <a id="comment-232660"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232655#comment-232655">Spot on, as I implied</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hal, I know.  It is hard for people to let go of identity politics.  The powers to be keep these gender, ethnic and social issues stirred up to keep us fighting among ourselves. This way we won't notice or focus on them transferring all the wealth to themselves to hoard and how they are starting wars for their economic gains. The younger voters are seeing this. </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 19 Jan 2017 16:45:03 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 232660 at http://dagblog.com When 20% of black voters in http://dagblog.com/comment/232657#comment-232657 <a id="comment-232657"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232656#comment-232656">I think white voters see</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>When 20% of black voters in Ohio voted for GW Bush, there were no acceptable excuses. The direct question was why these voters acted against there own self interest. Soon after Republicans got those votes, they quit their outreach to the black community. The black community corrected an error and voted against the GOP in subsequent elections. Whites voters see Republicans destroying unions, voting against job creation bills, ready to destroy healthcare and they vote for Republicans. They blame Democrats for not addressing their issues. Voting for the GOP makes not sense. Even now people who voted for Trump say that they thought the GOP was just joking when they said that would destroy healthcare. Congress can't wait to gut healthcare. How do we make white voters less gullible?</p> <p>Even after losing the election, Democrats fought for healthcare benefits for coal miners who  in all likelihood voted for Trump. Republicans blocked their efforts.</p> <p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/democrats-congress-coal-miners-heath-benefits_us_5849db0ee4b0bd9c3dfbec52">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/democrats-congress-coal-miners-heath...</a></p> <p>​Democrats were looking out for the interests of the coal miners.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 19 Jan 2017 14:46:27 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 232657 at http://dagblog.com