dagblog - Comments for "How could this have happened?" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/how-could-have-happened-21741 Comments for "How could this have happened?" en Whoops. http://dagblog.com/comment/232839#comment-232839 <a id="comment-232839"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232822#comment-232822">Those were not my words and</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Whoops.</p> <p>I had a Trump moment there.and lost track of the beginning. No more posting after my bedtime.</p> <p>I understand what you mean by "pretend."</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 23 Jan 2017 15:28:29 +0000 moat comment 232839 at http://dagblog.com personal side note to ocean http://dagblog.com/comment/232829#comment-232829 <a id="comment-232829"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232817#comment-232817">You&#039;re the one who keeps</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>personal side note to ocean-kat: I sure am glad I had to miss all of this, reminds me of painful Obamamania at TPMCafe in 2008.<img alt="wink" height="23" src="http://cdn.ckeditor.com/4.5.6/full-all/plugins/smiley/images/wink_smile.png" title="wink" width="23" /> agin</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 23 Jan 2017 04:09:06 +0000 artappraiser comment 232829 at http://dagblog.com You're the one who keeps http://dagblog.com/comment/232817#comment-232817 <a id="comment-232817"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232815#comment-232815">Yes you did.  You provided a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You're the one who keeps lashing out at Hillary. For me the primary was over months ago. Anyone who can do math knew it was clearly over months before Sanders decided to admit it was over. Even after the general election you're still nursing your hurt butt that by a large majority the democrats didn't want Sanders to be the nominee. Maybe you need to consider that the democratic party is not where you want to be. I stand by every post I made here your distorted interpretation of them not with standing. What you've never been able to understand is that no matter how much you believe your opinions that doesn't make them facts.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 23 Jan 2017 03:34:38 +0000 ocean-kat comment 232817 at http://dagblog.com Trump is a Clusterf**k http://dagblog.com/comment/232824#comment-232824 <a id="comment-232824"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232822#comment-232822">Those were not my words and</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Trump is a Clusterf**k elected by racists and women-haters. We need to encourage non-racists to vote. Many were under the impression that Hillary had the election in the bag and didn't bother to vote. Hillary was the best choice. The racists let their bigotry override their brains. White women and Evangelicals voted for a misogynist and faux-Christian. Women voted against their own self-interests because they succumbed to the pressure of male supremacy. In 2018, we need to insure that minorities and young women vote. Hillary was a fine candidate. Hubert Humphrey was a fine candidate. Racists will screw things up every time. David Duke is very happy with DJ Trump.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 23 Jan 2017 03:09:29 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 232824 at http://dagblog.com Those were not my words and http://dagblog.com/comment/232822#comment-232822 <a id="comment-232822"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232818#comment-232818">You wrote that her supporters</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Those were not my words and they never were my words.  I did not edit out anything like that.  I did write the following and it is still in this thread:</p> <p>"Those who pretend that Clinton was a fine candidate who was undermined by progressives are making it far more likely we will continue to nominate bad candidates who may well lose and, if they win, will set back the movement for justice and the Democratic party as Bill Clinton did in a number of important ways."</p> <p>That sentence is written in the present tense as a criticism of those who now, after Clinton lost disastrously, still "pretend" she was a "fine candidate".  By definition, she could not possibly have been a fine candidate since she lost to the most unpopular candidate ever.  Yet people still claim she was.  That's what I was referring to.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 23 Jan 2017 02:58:20 +0000 HSG comment 232822 at http://dagblog.com Trump is an authoritarian who http://dagblog.com/comment/232821#comment-232821 <a id="comment-232821"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232820#comment-232820">Nothing matters except that</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Trump is an authoritarian who can have agencies wipe data or refuse to release data to the public. We are under assault. We don't have the time to spend on what if Trump wasn't elected, Trump is in the White House.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 23 Jan 2017 02:54:21 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 232821 at http://dagblog.com Trump is the president. He http://dagblog.com/comment/232819#comment-232819 <a id="comment-232819"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232814#comment-232814">I agree that racism played a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Trump is the president. He has racists on his side and in his Cabinet. The DOJ has put a lawsuit against voter suppression in Texas on hold. The White House website has removed mention of Climate Change. The women's march documents the concerns women have about Trump. Trump says that those who disagree with his agenda are his enemies. Kellyanne wants to discuss alternative facts. Do we really have to keep spending time on the 2016 election? When LBJ signed the Civil Rights bills, racists fled the Democratic Party for the GOP. Another group of racists shifted to the GOP in 2016. They are gone. Look at the size of the crowds in D.C. and across the nation.That is our base. They are ready to toss any Republican in sight out of office.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 23 Jan 2017 02:51:40 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 232819 at http://dagblog.com Nothing matters except that http://dagblog.com/comment/232820#comment-232820 <a id="comment-232820"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232819#comment-232819">Trump is the president. He</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Nothing matters except that Hal knows who is guilty, and it's not him.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 23 Jan 2017 02:41:21 +0000 NCD comment 232820 at http://dagblog.com You wrote that her supporters http://dagblog.com/comment/232818#comment-232818 <a id="comment-232818"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232816#comment-232816">I didn&#039;t write that Clinton&#039;s</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You wrote that her supporters pretended something they could not really believe or support as a matter of fact.<br /> Those are your words.</p> <p>Edit to add:</p> <p>Those <u>were</u> your words before the discussion unfolded and you edited your comment.</p> <p>Wow. So it is like that.<br />  </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 23 Jan 2017 02:15:01 +0000 moat comment 232818 at http://dagblog.com I didn't write that Clinton's http://dagblog.com/comment/232816#comment-232816 <a id="comment-232816"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232803#comment-232803">It is tempting to engage with</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I didn't write that Clinton's supporters voted for her against their own better understanding.  I wrote and believe that by refusing to acknowledge her very serious shortcomings, her staunch supporters had little credibility when trying to persuade fence sitters to vote for her rather than to stay home or to vote for a third-party candidate.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 23 Jan 2017 01:20:13 +0000 HSG comment 232816 at http://dagblog.com