dagblog - Comments for "How Not To Do It" http://dagblog.com/link/how-not-do-it-21742 Comments for "How Not To Do It" en Yes. http://dagblog.com/comment/232779#comment-232779 <a id="comment-232779"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232746#comment-232746">Money will always be</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yes.<br /> In all the talk about identity, there seems to be a group missing that would countervail the people hell bent on removing "us" from the steps of power.<br /> They are better at grouping us than we are.<br /> A generation or two ago, there was remorse expressed at the limited powers of the "Commons" to solve all problems. I am pretty sure those critics were not recommending that we eliminate the concept entirely.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 22 Jan 2017 20:14:59 +0000 moat comment 232779 at http://dagblog.com Money will always be http://dagblog.com/comment/232746#comment-232746 <a id="comment-232746"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/how-not-do-it-21742">How Not To Do It</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Money will always be essential in politics, as it will be in life generally.  Yet as the Tea Party showed, engagement by the rank and file citizen in your cause(s), along with a hearty dose of carefully parsed rhetoric can work freakin' wonders.  If Democrats waste this narrow opportunity, we just might deserve continued losses.</p> <p>While Brock and other Democrats continue their party donor begging (hopefully more behind the scenes than before), can we somehow manage as a <em>people </em>to recognize our own importance?</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sun, 22 Jan 2017 00:47:14 +0000 barefooted comment 232746 at http://dagblog.com