dagblog - Comments for "Pictures From Women’s Marches Around the World (pretty amazing)" http://dagblog.com/link/pictures-women-s-marches-around-world-pretty-amazing-21744 Comments for "Pictures From Women’s Marches Around the World (pretty amazing)" en lordy you are more cyncial http://dagblog.com/comment/232879#comment-232879 <a id="comment-232879"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232861#comment-232861">Well, Michael - only when he</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>lordy you are more cyncial than even me. <img alt="wink" height="23" src="http://cdn.ckeditor.com/4.5.6/full-all/plugins/smiley/images/wink_smile.png" title="wink" width="23" /></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:14:40 +0000 artappraiser comment 232879 at http://dagblog.com Well, Michael - only when he http://dagblog.com/comment/232861#comment-232861 <a id="comment-232861"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232840#comment-232840">Yeah, I noted this too. So</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well, Michael - only when the Orangeman came for *them*. Because *they* are the arbiters of false equivalency and supposed balance, and if the arbiter is gone, well, the Grey Lady and compatriots rule the roost, and there is *nothing* else. The Fourth Estate is finally having its hissy fit, without actually reporting on something interesting - news outside of lies has become dull as dirt, and even that's boringly repetitive - just picking up the pieces from the "carnage". It's like having news duty at a fire or traffic accident - just report the casualties and fill the dead air.</p> <p>Of course helps that "ding dong, the witch is dead" - there's no one serious on the left to talk about - Hillary &amp; Obama are both retired, with only second-stringers running about, so it's a 1-man 1-ring circus.</p> <p>Waiting for this to all become the new normal, since the dudes have to sell newspapers after all. They'll spin it however they need to get that paycheck &amp; stockholder return. (perhaps there's hope in the great tech titan ownership like Bezos, but I doubt it)</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:28:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 232861 at http://dagblog.com Greg Sargent on topic @ WaPO, http://dagblog.com/comment/232856#comment-232856 <a id="comment-232856"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232840#comment-232840">Yeah, I noted this too. So</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Greg Sargent on topic @ WaPO, argues this time IS different:</p> <p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2017/01/23/dear-media-the-trump-white-house-has-total-contempt-for-you-time-to-react-accordingly/?tid=hybrid_experimentrandom_1_na&amp;utm_term=.8be8a53afee3">Dear media: The Trump White House has total contempt for you. Time to react accordingly.</a></p> <p>and note the cross-link at mid-page</p> <p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2017/01/23/how-to-deal-with-the-lying-liars/?tid=a_inl&amp;utm_term=.19494f227ab6">How to deal with the lying liars </a>by Jennifer Rubin</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 24 Jan 2017 06:07:54 +0000 artappraiser comment 232856 at http://dagblog.com Obvious leakers feeding WaPo http://dagblog.com/comment/232854#comment-232854 <a id="comment-232854"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232853#comment-232853">I just read the whole article</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Obvious leakers feeding WaPo's new headline, they put 3 reporters on it:</p> <p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/the-first-days-inside-trumps-white-house-fury-tumult-and-a-reboot/2017/01/23/7ceef1b0-e191-11e6-ba11-63c4b4fb5a63_story.html">The first days inside Trump’s White House: Fury, tumult and a reboot</a></p> <p>Careful, could be intentional spin?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 24 Jan 2017 05:06:01 +0000 artappraiser comment 232854 at http://dagblog.com I just read the whole article http://dagblog.com/comment/232853#comment-232853 <a id="comment-232853"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232852#comment-232852">Turns out a Trump LIE is the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I just read the whole article and it's kinda scary, really starting to sound like he's got worse mental illness than any of us New Yorker's ever imagined. I'm serious! Behind closed doors with Congress, he repeats his obssession of the day before that got him pans from the CIA. Does he really think this is going to be like his TV show? What the heck is going on? It could be the MSM is getting scared to death by other stuff going on they can't write yet?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 24 Jan 2017 04:44:41 +0000 artappraiser comment 232853 at http://dagblog.com Turns out a Trump LIE is the http://dagblog.com/comment/232852#comment-232852 <a id="comment-232852"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232840#comment-232840">Yeah, I noted this too. So</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Turns out a Trump<em> LIE </em>is the lead story on their home page right this minute, Michael; pasted:</p> <p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/pages/politics/index.html?src=hpHeader">THE 45TH PRESIDENT</a></p> <p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/23/us/politics/donald-trump-congress-democrats.html">Trump Repeats an Election Lie in Meeting With Top Lawmakers</a></p> <p>That's just serendipity, I went there to search because I noticed they started doing it <em>a lot</em> with the pushback from him and his minions against their coverage of the inauguration,. But I didn't have to search, looks like they aren't going to stop.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 24 Jan 2017 04:22:02 +0000 artappraiser comment 232852 at http://dagblog.com My theory: It took someone as http://dagblog.com/comment/232849#comment-232849 <a id="comment-232849"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232838#comment-232838">I have to humbly ask why</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>My theory: It took someone as obnoxious about it as Trump a long time to do it, but he and only he (with Kellyanne's skillful help, I'd like to note!) could finally push them over the edge.  (To be clear:irony intended!)</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 24 Jan 2017 04:01:47 +0000 artappraiser comment 232849 at http://dagblog.com The media was OK with the http://dagblog.com/comment/232843#comment-232843 <a id="comment-232843"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232838#comment-232838">I have to humbly ask why</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The media was OK with the unqualified alt-candidate, the no tax returns openly racist alt-campaign, the non-existent 'fantastic, cheaper' alt-health care plan, the racists rebranding as 'alt-right', the alt-cabinet of white guys who want to destroy the government, but the media is recognizing a problem with alt-truth and is resisting Trumps desire for an alt-First Amendment, where free speech applies only to him</p> <p>Trump will not attack problems, he will continue to attack people who call him out, reality, and the pillars of our democracy.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:12:22 +0000 NCD comment 232843 at http://dagblog.com MSM now views the attacks as http://dagblog.com/comment/232842#comment-232842 <a id="comment-232842"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232838#comment-232838">I have to humbly ask why</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>MSM now views the attacks as squarely directed at them rather than at mere regular citizens.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 23 Jan 2017 16:14:03 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 232842 at http://dagblog.com Yeah, I noted this too. So http://dagblog.com/comment/232840#comment-232840 <a id="comment-232840"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232756#comment-232756">After being chastised all</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, I noted this too. So when do the Grey Lady start calling them lies?</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 23 Jan 2017 15:45:13 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 232840 at http://dagblog.com