dagblog - Comments for "Identity Politics is Actually Important" http://dagblog.com/identity-politics-actually-important-21751 Comments for "Identity Politics is Actually Important" en Hmmmm... I see that Hal http://dagblog.com/comment/233032#comment-233032 <a id="comment-233032"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/identity-politics-actually-important-21751">Identity Politics is Actually Important</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em><strong>Hmmmm...</strong></em> <strong>I see that Hal dropped in...</strong></p> <p>He does have a fixed outlook on reality.</p> <p><img alt="" height="147" src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3b/HTC_Vive_(16).jpg/220px-HTC_Vive_(16).jpg" width="220" /></p> <p>~OGD~</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 27 Jan 2017 05:48:27 +0000 oldenGoldenDecoy comment 233032 at http://dagblog.com Here is a link to the poll I http://dagblog.com/comment/232995#comment-232995 <a id="comment-232995"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232992#comment-232992">Correct. The bottom line is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Here is a link to the poll I mentioned above that includes Trump voter's beliefs. It includes video from the Rachel Maddow discussing the poll</p> <p><a href="http://www.politicususa.com/2017/01/25/poll-shows-americans-support-womens-marchers-donald-trump.html">http://www.politicususa.com/2017/01/25/poll-shows-americans-support-wome...</a></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 26 Jan 2017 13:59:11 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 232995 at http://dagblog.com Correct. The bottom line is http://dagblog.com/comment/232992#comment-232992 <a id="comment-232992"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232984#comment-232984">Hal is unwilling to consider</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Correct. The bottom line is that blacks were "tricked" by Hillary. They need to be shown the "error" of their ways.. Whites who voted for the mentally impaired Donald Trump were acting in a "responsible" fashion. Democrats have to address the rational white voters, Irrational black voters have to be re-educated. Hal doesn't mean it to be condescending, but it comes across that way. Sanders seemed distant as well. Hillary had black people who could tell the community things that Hillary and Bill had done behind the scenes. Bernie had none of that type of support. Bernie had a rapper who had a revelation about Sanders while smoking marijuana. The sad fact we face now is that 30% of the population is hard-wired to support Trump and many others are willing to go with the flow towards Trump. We need to organize those whites, blacks, etc. who realize that the GOP is taking the country in the wrong direction. The only identity politics in play is coming from Trump supporters.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 26 Jan 2017 13:14:38 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 232992 at http://dagblog.com Hal is unwilling to consider http://dagblog.com/comment/232984#comment-232984 <a id="comment-232984"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232974#comment-232974">I noted Danny&#039;s comments</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hal is unwilling to consider the possibility that Hillary might have done some good over the years and earned anyone's trust and vote. If blacks didn't vote for Sanders the only possible explanation is that Hillary did something nefarious to turn them against him.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 26 Jan 2017 07:15:41 +0000 ocean-kat comment 232984 at http://dagblog.com I noted Danny's comments http://dagblog.com/comment/232974#comment-232974 <a id="comment-232974"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232971#comment-232971">Of course my explanation</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I noted Danny's comments about your posts in his latest comments. My analysis of your comments is based on my analysis of how they would be seen in the black community </p> <p>----------</p> <p>Hal, you remain in a bubble. You expect rational behavior from white voters, most ethnic minority voters are surprised when that happens. Actually, many of my white friends share my surprise. You cannot expand your horizons. You repeatedly state that you believe that Hillary “convinced” blacks that she was committed to Civil Rights, while Bernie was the better choice. You cannot move from the position that suggests black voters were duped. Bernie Sanders had very few people in the black community who could vouch that he fought in their interest. Bernie was a blank slate who came to the black community begging for votes as an afterthought. Because you think that you know what is better for black people, you cannot accept that reality. Bernie voted for the 1994 crime bill, Bernie- splained why that didn't matter, and then criticized Hillary for the crime bill he signed. I have explained this to you repeatedly but your narrow view of the world cannot accept the facts. In your heart of hearts, you believe that the simple-minded blacks were duped. At one point, you pointed out a picture of Sanders at the Edmund Pettus Bridge attending  a re-enactment of the historic walk across the bridge. This picture was to show his support of Civil Rights. The problem is that Jefferson Beauregard Sessions also has a picture at the bridge that is supposed to show his support for Civil Rights. The picture doesn't matter. Sanders lack of contact with the black community mattered. He was not accepted by the black community.</p> <p>You state that Democrats forgot about the working class. This biased statement ignores the existence of black, Latino, and Asia working class people. Working class ethnic minorities voted overwhelmingly for Hillary. According to you they are morally inferior. When faced with a misogynist like Trump, 94% of black women voted for Hillary. Are you their moral superior? 53% of white women voted for Trump. 48% of white voters went for Trump. 88% of black voters rejected Trump. The only, I repeat, the only ethnic group that went for Trump was white voters. Instead of asking why whites were so gullible, you blame Hillary and the Democrats.</p> <p>Trump is mentally unstable. He is going to have a snipe hunt for voter fraud. This comes after his stated belief that Barack Obama is not a citizen of the United States. Trump still believes that the Central Park Five are guilty, despite the evidence to the contrary. Trump does not accept facts that disagree with his beliefs. He is delusional. He does not “believe” in Climate Change. Trump does not “believe” that Russia acted to influence the election.Trump is mentally incompetent. The fact of his mental fragility was known during the campaign. Despite this knowledge, white voters voted for Trump. No other ethnic group voted for Trump. White voters opted for a lunatic. Your biased view blinds you to this fact. The pathology is in the voters, not the Democratic Party. Whites are the majority participants in the stock market. The market is sky-rocketing because whites love the lunatic in the White House. That is not reflective of a problem with the Democratic Party. Some whites are willing to profit at the hands of a person threatening great harm to the black community. They are immoral. Martin Luther King Jr. would criticize those white voters.</p> <p>Blacks are working on changing their behavior. Political feuds with Latinos are largely a thing of the past. Black homophobia at the polls is decreasing. When Kim Burrell, a gospel singer and pastor, made homophobic statements in her church and received support from gospel icon Shirley Caesar, both women received a backlash from black social media. Times are changing.</p> <p>Blacks are continuing to work out issues in the black community. The white community has to do the same. Many white voters know that there is a problem that needs to be dealt with in the white community that led to the election of Donald Trump. They are in despair. I talk to some of these people every day. They need your help in working to change the hearts of white people, just like the hearts of people like Burrell and Caesar need changing. Instead of dealing with the racism and homophobia that aided the ability for white voters to vote for lunatic Donald Trump, you blame the Democrats.</p> <p>You will not be part of the solution that Democrats need. A PPP poll that will be released tomorrow shows that Trump voters believe that Donald Trump’s inaugural crowd was larger than Barack Obama’s 2009 crowd. They think the Trump inauguration crowd was larger than the Women's March in D.C. the following day. They believe that George Soros paid most of the women who marched in D.C. on the 21st. Trump voters are gullible. They believe things that are not true. Instead of addressing their racism, homophobia, and gullibility, you attack Democrats.</p> <p>We have been over this repeatedly. If you took your message to the black community, you would likely be rejected as an apologist for the bizarre behavior of white voters. You are stuck in a bubble. You don't want to work your way out.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 26 Jan 2017 02:56:58 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 232974 at http://dagblog.com Of course my explanation http://dagblog.com/comment/232971#comment-232971 <a id="comment-232971"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232966#comment-232966">Yeah, I think you&#039;re not</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Of course my explanation doesn't make sense to you because you came up with a different explanation.  With respect to yours, I think there's definitely truth to it but because the Clintons repeatedly acted in ways that harmed the African-American community, many (perhaps a majority) would have forsaken Clinton if they had believed Bernie was truly on their side.  Clinton and her allies persuaded a significant number that he was not.  In any event, we are now arguing over what caused a particular phenomenon not whether I am puzzled by it.  I am not puzzled by it.  I am just, in your estimation, wrong.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 26 Jan 2017 02:26:00 +0000 HSG comment 232971 at http://dagblog.com Yeah, I think you're not http://dagblog.com/comment/232966#comment-232966 <a id="comment-232966"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232948#comment-232948">I agree with most, not all,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, I think you're not understanding the deep ties that both Bill and Hillary Clinton have with African American communities around the country and because of that, you're never going to really figure out what happened during the primaries.  Your explanation doesn't really make sense. Sanders simply never forged the ties the Clintons did over the years and that just stands to reason -- the Clintons have been operating on the national scene, Sanders in a very white state. Hillary did not have to convince African Americans that Sanders lacked commitment, she was able to enter the race with an established relationship to a group of voters.</p> <p>As for the primary selection not really mattering -- it's a bit tangential to the moral arguments in favor of identity politics.  This is less about winning or losing than doing the right thing.  So to speak.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 26 Jan 2017 00:55:05 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 232966 at http://dagblog.com I agree with most, not all, http://dagblog.com/comment/232948#comment-232948 <a id="comment-232948"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/identity-politics-actually-important-21751">Identity Politics is Actually Important</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I agree with most, not all, of this.  Under the circumstance, therefore, I would not normally comment.  But, you did mention me specifically writing in reference to my most recent <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/fusing-group-identity-and-class-based-politics-21749">blog</a> that "Hal wants to know why black voters were so reluctant to support Bernie Sanders and were so enthusiastic for Hillary Clinton."   In fact, I note that some progressives were "puzzled" by African-American support for Clinton but explain this phenomenon as follows, "Clinton, however, succeeded in convincing many African-Americans that Sanders’ focus on economic injustice bespoke an insufficient commitment to racial justice."</p> <p>My other disagreement centers around your statement that "who Democrats chose in the primary is almost beside the point."  I believe there were profound differences between the two candidates and that the Democratic party's best (perhaps only) chance for long-term ascendency lies in adopting the Sanders agenda and following his call to hive off corporate influence from its political decisions.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 25 Jan 2017 21:35:17 +0000 HSG comment 232948 at http://dagblog.com Danny - if anything I wrote http://dagblog.com/comment/232946#comment-232946 <a id="comment-232946"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232875#comment-232875">I&#039;ve read all of Hal&#039;s</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Danny - if anything I wrote causes you to believe that I "view matters of life and death as trivial matters to be pushed aside for electoral success," I am terribly sorry.  I believe that Black Lives Matter very very much and they (black lives) are one of the main reasons that I take the political positions that I take.  Obviously, I have failed to communicate that to you.  I will strive to do a better job in the future.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 25 Jan 2017 21:23:21 +0000 HSG comment 232946 at http://dagblog.com Thanks for this. One of the http://dagblog.com/comment/232915#comment-232915 <a id="comment-232915"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/identity-politics-actually-important-21751">Identity Politics is Actually Important</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks for this. One of the problems Progressives face is that we often ask the question "What is wrong with us?". The more proper question is "What the Hell were those voters thinking?" To be charitable, trump is obviously not well. His press secretary states that Trump believes what he believes. Faced with pictures showing larger crowds for Obama in 2009 compared to his inauguration in 2017, Trump believes that his crowd was larger. Trump believes that millions of immigrants voted for Hillary. Trump believes that he saw thousands of Muslims cheering as the Twin Towers came down. Trump cannot be shaken from these beliefs. Do we really believe that Trump thinks that President Obama was born in the United States? I don't. Trump is delusional. Large chunks of the public know that Trump is delusional. Others don't care that Trump is delusional. Those who refuse to acknowledge that Trump is mistaken are practicing true identity politics. They allow their skin color to suppress their rational thought process. Democrats are not going to win these voters back.</p> <p>Blacks and Latinos used to play crabs in a barrel politically. Things have calmed down dramatically. Latinos overwhelmingly supported Barack Obama. Obama is supporting Tom Perez for DNC chair. Reverend Al Sharpton welcomed LGBTQ activists to march against Stop and Frisk. This was a marked difference when you compare it to the monochrome nature of Occupy Wall Street. I pointed out that the women organizing the women's march made it diverse. We have structures that can bring people together.</p> <p>When the Trump White House took Civil Rights down from their website, Climate Change, and LGBT issues also came down. Bigotry against Muslims is not mentioned. We can all attack the Trump administration to protect our personal issues. We have a better chance attacking together. We need to put pressure at multiple points.We are in this together.</p> <p>The only identity politics being practiced is by Trump supporters. You have to pass rigid criteria if you are black and a Trump supporter. Omarosa, Ben Carson, Stacey Dash, etc. have support Trump's view of blacks as living in     refugee camps. Trump had no clue that John Lewis' district was doing quite well. Trump supporters love the Stepping Fetchit stereotype of the black community. They hate educated blacks who do not pathologize the black community. Trump supporters want blacks in their place. They also do not accept Latinos who do not bow and scrape. They will tolerate Gays who are no longer Gay. The true identity politics folks are in the Trump camp.</p> <p>Blacks have no problem pushing back against other blacks who are willing to degrade themselves. Trump is unaware that blacks do other things besides entertain and play sports. Entertainers and Athletes are not black leaders. Trump does not know this. Trump was happy to meet with Jim Brown, Ray Lewis, and Steve Harvey. None of these men are on speed dial when a dire situation happens in the black community. They all received negative responses from the black community for providing a photo-op for Trump.</p> <p>Trump shut down commentary at the EPA. His is restarting pipeline projects. A case that the DOJ was fighting against voter suppression in Texas has been put on hold. Republicans in Congress are working on restrictions against abortion. We are under assault. The assault is happening now.</p> <p>we do not have time to keep addressing 2016. We are taking fire in 2017. We have a coalition. Reactionaries are not going to become Democrats. Ellison is acceptable as DNC chair. Perez is acceptable as DNC chair. Whites, blacks, Latinos, and Asians are calling their Congressperson to complain. They are protesting at the doors of their member of Congress. The coalition is ready to go.</p> <p>BTW, Hillary got more popular votes than Trump, no matter what Trump believes.</p> <p>Edit to add:</p> <p>The WSJ calls Trump's delusion an "unsupported claim"</p> <p><a href="http://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trump-repeats-unsupported-claim-that-voter-fraud-skewed-election-tally-1485229088">http://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trump-repeats-unsupported-claim-that-...</a></p> <p>The NYT calls the delusion a lie</p> <p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/23/us/politics/donald-trump-congress-democrats.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/23/us/politics/donald-trump-congress-dem...</a></p> <p>NYT details why the delusion is false</p> <p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/24/us/politics/unauthorized-immigrant-voting-trump-lie.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/24/us/politics/unauthorized-immigrant-vo...</a></p> <p>Trump voters will believe that immigrants voted. Trump voters believe that Hillary had a child porn ring but do not believe that Russia tried to influence the election. They are not going to join our coalition.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 25 Jan 2017 03:24:36 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 232915 at http://dagblog.com