dagblog - Comments for "Shhh ..." http://dagblog.com/link/shhh-21756 Comments for "Shhh ..." en @ my Linked In feed, editor http://dagblog.com/comment/232938#comment-232938 <a id="comment-232938"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232906#comment-232906">Wonder if this sort of news</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>@ my Linked In feed, editor Nicolas Thompson of The New Yorker posted <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/business/adam-davidson/what-the-death-of-the-t-p-p-means-for-america?utm_content=buffer498b9&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_source=linkedin.com&amp;utm_campaign=buffer">Adam Davidson's  news article on this </a>with this added comment:</p> <p><em>We've killed the TPP. That won't have much effect here--good or bad--but <strong>it's great news for China.</strong></em></p> </div></div></div> Wed, 25 Jan 2017 20:10:58 +0000 artappraiser comment 232938 at http://dagblog.com Yes. The trade agreements may http://dagblog.com/comment/232908#comment-232908 <a id="comment-232908"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/232906#comment-232906">Wonder if this sort of news</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yes. The trade agreements may have all kinds of bad consequences but leaving them all (especially at the same time) has consequences too.<br /> I am pretty sure this move will screw actual Republicans. May they pursue their own interests (to a certain extent).<br /> I have run out of parentheses.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 25 Jan 2017 01:24:20 +0000 moat comment 232908 at http://dagblog.com Wonder if this sort of news http://dagblog.com/comment/232906#comment-232906 <a id="comment-232906"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/shhh-21756">Shhh ...</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Wonder if this sort of news is what they'd like to suppress - from <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-01-24/trump-s-push-to-protect-small-town-workers-leaves-farmers-behind">Bloomberg</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Trump’s decision Monday to pull out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which would have reduced tariffs and strengthened economic ties between the U.S. and 11 other countries, will cost the agriculture industry as much as $4.4 billion a year in potential sales, according to the American Farm Bureau Federation, the biggest U.S. farmer group.</p> <p>Reopening talks over the North American Free Trade Agreement, which Trump has called a "disaster" and plans to bring up in a meeting later this month with the Mexican president, risks dealing an even bigger blow for agriculture, one of the few sectors of the American economy with a net trade surplus.</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Wed, 25 Jan 2017 01:12:51 +0000 barefooted comment 232906 at http://dagblog.com