dagblog - Comments for "Acting Attorney General Will Not Defend" http://dagblog.com/link/acting-attorney-general-will-not-defend-21791 Comments for "Acting Attorney General Will Not Defend" en In fact, knowing that http://dagblog.com/comment/233230#comment-233230 <a id="comment-233230"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/233228#comment-233228">I love it.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>In fact, knowing that whomever trump gets through as AG would fire her, she went out in a blaze of glory.  Yes, it took guts, but she absolutely will benefit from it.  GOOD FOR HER!!!!!!!</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 31 Jan 2017 23:21:19 +0000 CVille Dem comment 233230 at http://dagblog.com And she's a relatively young http://dagblog.com/comment/233229#comment-233229 <a id="comment-233229"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/233228#comment-233228">I love it.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>And she's a relatively young woman, so with this on her now very public resume there will be very few doors she won't be able to open.  At least among those she would choose.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 31 Jan 2017 23:04:41 +0000 barefooted comment 233229 at http://dagblog.com I love it. http://dagblog.com/comment/233228#comment-233228 <a id="comment-233228"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/233226#comment-233226">A bipartisan group of 60</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I love it.</p> <p>P.S. Comes to mind Yates will have no problem with reputation for the rest of her life, the Sessions confirmation question is like a golden parachute. Wish everyone were so lucky when they did right.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 31 Jan 2017 22:57:49 +0000 artappraiser comment 233228 at http://dagblog.com A bipartisan group of 60 http://dagblog.com/comment/233226#comment-233226 <a id="comment-233226"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/acting-attorney-general-will-not-defend-21791">Acting Attorney General Will Not Defend</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>A <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/31/politics/sally-yates-firing-prosecutors-letter/">bipartisan group of 60 former federal prosecutors</a> is backing Yates -</p> <p><em>"Struck by one stunning headline after another, we stopped to think: If we were called upon to defend the executive order, could we do it within the guidelines we learned and lived by as lawyers for the United States? We could not," the letter said.</em></p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 31 Jan 2017 22:41:51 +0000 barefooted comment 233226 at http://dagblog.com ok, good, my bad and Gaba's http://dagblog.com/comment/233222#comment-233222 <a id="comment-233222"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/233221#comment-233221">Actually think it was this</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>ok, good, my bad and Gaba's also good for crediting @ staffer news.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 31 Jan 2017 21:14:22 +0000 artappraiser comment 233222 at http://dagblog.com Actually think it was this http://dagblog.com/comment/233221#comment-233221 <a id="comment-233221"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/233218#comment-233218">side topic: I note the New</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Actually think it was Gaba that Ramachandran retweeted:</p> <p><a href="https://twitter.com/charles_gaba"><strong> ☪️Charles Gaba  ☪️</strong> ‏<s>@</s><strong>charles_gaba</strong> </a> <a href="https://twitter.com/charles_gaba/status/826315193588264960" title="10:24 PM - 30 Jan 2017">14h14 hours ago</a></p> <p>More</p> <p>ATTENTION TWITTER: Here’s the full 5-minute exchange between Sessions &amp; Yates: <a dir="ltr" href="https://t.co/zzuuYW84AP" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXDt3WA07zc&amp;feature=youtu.be">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXDt3WA07zc&amp;feature=youtu.be …</a> <a dir="ltr" href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/SallyYates?src=hash"><s>#</s><strong>SallyYates</strong></a></p> <p>But Gaba turns around &amp; sez:</p> <p><a href="https://twitter.com/charles_gaba"><img alt="" src="https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/723145771663511552/rfElo8U0_bigger.jpg" /><strong> ☪️Charles Gaba  ☪️</strong> ‏<s>@</s><strong>charles_gaba</strong> </a> <a href="https://twitter.com/charles_gaba/status/826302987765170176" title="9:35 PM - 30 Jan 2017">15h15 hours ago</a></p> <p><img alt="⚠️" src="https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/26a0.png" title="Warning sign" />ATTENTION TWITTER: I’m glad this is going viral, but credit for the find belongs to <a dir="ltr" href="https://twitter.com/staffernews"><s>@</s><strong>staffernews</strong></a> (or at least, that’s who sent it to me)!</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:54:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 233221 at http://dagblog.com side topic: I note the New http://dagblog.com/comment/233218#comment-233218 <a id="comment-233218"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/233205#comment-233205">GOTCHA of SESSIONS, by a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>side topic: I note the New York Post has removed all evidence that this came from a tweet by that blogger and now just present the video as their own find. Boo. You give up claims to plagiarism if you want viral, I guess? For the greater good...</p> <p>He is @ Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/yottapoint">T. R. Ramachandran</a> and his blog is <a href="http://electionado.com/">http://electionado.com/</a></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:33:48 +0000 artappraiser comment 233218 at http://dagblog.com Everyone caught in hypocrisy? http://dagblog.com/comment/233214#comment-233214 <a id="comment-233214"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/233210#comment-233210">Great catch. Amazing.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Everyone caught in hypocrisy? Or just SOP with Republicans?</p> <p>And 'ancient history' meaning <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=trump+republicans+contradict+themselves&amp;prmd=nvi&amp;source=lnt&amp;tbs=qdr:m&amp;sa=X&amp;ved=0ahUKEwj5n6rmku3RAhWDWLwKHeeiBGwQpwUIEw&amp;biw=480&amp;bih=300">anything</a> from yesterday on back a ways?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 31 Jan 2017 19:50:14 +0000 NCD comment 233214 at http://dagblog.com I thought the hearings were http://dagblog.com/comment/233213#comment-233213 <a id="comment-233213"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/233211#comment-233211">I&#039;m sure this will come up in</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I thought the hearings were over and today was vote day.  Or do they get to ask more when it goes to the full Senate?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 31 Jan 2017 19:12:06 +0000 CVille Dem comment 233213 at http://dagblog.com Though to no particular avail http://dagblog.com/comment/233212#comment-233212 <a id="comment-233212"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/233211#comment-233211">I&#039;m sure this will come up in</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Though to no particular avail.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 31 Jan 2017 19:04:02 +0000 barefooted comment 233212 at http://dagblog.com