dagblog - Comments for "Schwarzenegger to Trump: ‘Why Don’t We Switch Jobs?’" http://dagblog.com/link/schwarzenegger-trump-why-don-t-we-switch-jobs-21817 Comments for "Schwarzenegger to Trump: ‘Why Don’t We Switch Jobs?’" en Good point. Some points http://dagblog.com/comment/233384#comment-233384 <a id="comment-233384"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/233378#comment-233378">People who have an aura of</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Good point. <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2017/02/02/media/kfile-stern-on-trump/">Some points Howard Stern makes in this piece about his "friend" The Donald fit with what you say</a>. I would take it further and say people who are popular celebrities, as in: always get attention the "it girl" or "it guy" or have charisma of some special kind, whether they are liked or not. Hence, when someone like Madonna disses him, he calls her "disgusting" as in: she doesn't deserve for people to be interested in her anymore. It's an emotional response from him. "Ratings" are all to him, not along the lines of what you do, but whether you can get eyeballs, he respects people who can get high ratings, they can hit him where it hurts if critical of him. From what Stern says--some of which also appears in a lot of psychological articles on him--he ain't going to let this kind of thing go and act more traditionally presidential.</p> <p>From all that, I can easily visualize him resigning if the going gets too tough on his ego. Seriously. He would just say "enough of this crap" and walk away and go have his own radio show where he can maintain self-delusion about being one of the greatest, most popular persons to ever walk the earth and criticize successors.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 03 Feb 2017 18:42:24 +0000 artappraiser comment 233384 at http://dagblog.com People who have an aura of http://dagblog.com/comment/233378#comment-233378 <a id="comment-233378"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/schwarzenegger-trump-why-don-t-we-switch-jobs-21817">Schwarzenegger to Trump: ‘Why Don’t We Switch Jobs?’</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>People who have an aura of insulation are immune to Trump ... he can insult, but his target can respond in kind. While Schwarzengger could never be president, he can point out if it were a simple choice, a majority of the public would prefer him just for the peace of mind. It says Trump is on a tight rope of his own making and Schwarzengger has no problem with shaking the wire to see how well Trump can hold his balance.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 03 Feb 2017 17:30:35 +0000 Beetlejuice comment 233378 at http://dagblog.com ZZZZING! http://dagblog.com/comment/233347#comment-233347 <a id="comment-233347"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/schwarzenegger-trump-why-don-t-we-switch-jobs-21817">Schwarzenegger to Trump: ‘Why Don’t We Switch Jobs?’</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>ZZZZING!</p> <p>I truly would prefer Arnold to Trump, Pence, or Ryan.</p> <p>did anyone catch the other gaffe he made, also at the National Prayer breakfast?  He was praising the guy who introduced him and he said, with his typical anemic vocabulary, that he would appoint him for the next year, followed by:</p> <p>"WHAT THE HELL?!"  -- He actually said that at the National Prayer Breakfast!  This goofus is so crude it is appalling. </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 02 Feb 2017 21:19:35 +0000 CVille Dem comment 233347 at http://dagblog.com I look forward to the movie http://dagblog.com/comment/233343#comment-233343 <a id="comment-233343"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/schwarzenegger-trump-why-don-t-we-switch-jobs-21817">Schwarzenegger to Trump: ‘Why Don’t We Switch Jobs?’</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I look forward to the <a href="https://moviepilot.com/p/how-the-movie-the-running-man-could-be-a-reality-with-president-trump/4143093">movie version</a></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 02 Feb 2017 20:21:58 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 233343 at http://dagblog.com Course, the whole thing might http://dagblog.com/comment/233342#comment-233342 <a id="comment-233342"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/schwarzenegger-trump-why-don-t-we-switch-jobs-21817">Schwarzenegger to Trump: ‘Why Don’t We Switch Jobs?’</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Course, the whole thing might have been stunt 2 use National Prayer Breakfast 2 boost Apprentice ratings. <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump">@realDonaldTrump</a> still owns piece. <a href="https://t.co/fl9pyH9GQo">https://t.co/fl9pyH9GQo</a></p> — David Axelrod (@davidaxelrod) <a href="https://twitter.com/davidaxelrod/status/827190600755712001">February 2, 2017</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Thu, 02 Feb 2017 20:18:06 +0000 artappraiser comment 233342 at http://dagblog.com