dagblog - Comments for "Trump and Staff Rethink Tactics After Stumbles" http://dagblog.com/link/trump-and-staff-rethink-tactics-after-stumbles-21848 Comments for "Trump and Staff Rethink Tactics After Stumbles" en George Bush can now do a "I http://dagblog.com/comment/233737#comment-233737 <a id="comment-233737"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/trump-and-staff-rethink-tactics-after-stumbles-21848">Trump and Staff Rethink Tactics After Stumbles</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>George Bush can now do a "I toldja so!" on the whole "being president, it's hard work, it's hard" thing:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/donald-trump-challenges-governing-presidency-234879" id="MAA4AEgMUABgAWoCdXN6AA" target="_blank"><strong>Trump</strong> vexed by challenges, scale of government</a></p> <p>Politico - ‎14 hours ago‎</p> <p>Being president is harder than <strong>Donald Trump</strong> thought, according to aides and allies who say that he's growing increasingly frustrated with the challenges of running the massive federal bureaucracy.</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Sat, 11 Feb 2017 00:24:01 +0000 artappraiser comment 233737 at http://dagblog.com White House aides are already http://dagblog.com/comment/233650#comment-233650 <a id="comment-233650"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/trump-and-staff-rethink-tactics-after-stumbles-21848">Trump and Staff Rethink Tactics After Stumbles</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <div> <p><a class="article usg-AFQjCNHsTmCGNTbT8TW7f19s-g7HKvHuHg did--5499623769284343077 _tracked" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sr=1&amp;ct2=us%2F1_0_s_3_1_a&amp;sa=t&amp;usg=AFQjCNHsTmCGNTbT8TW7f19s-g7HKvHuHg&amp;cid=52779375753708&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.msnbc.com%2Frachel-maddow-show%2Fwhite-house-aides-are-already-eager-dish-dirt-about-trump&amp;ei=ApWbWJGtC9HVzAL5qYrACQ&amp;rt=HOMEPAGE&amp;vm=STANDARD&amp;bvm=section&amp;did=-5499623769284343077&amp;sid=en_us-w&amp;ssid=w&amp;st=1&amp;at=dt0" id="MAA4AUgDUABgAWoCdXM" target="_blank">White House aides are already eager to dish dirt about Trump</a></p> </div> <div>MSNBC - ‎5 hours ago‎</div> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Wed, 08 Feb 2017 22:10:07 +0000 artappraiser comment 233650 at http://dagblog.com News is continually being http://dagblog.com/comment/233644#comment-233644 <a id="comment-233644"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/233643#comment-233643">Paula: But Charles I saw you</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>News is continually being reported. Trump thinks that he can doing anything he wishes in the name of national security. He also believes that the 3 judges on the panel reviewing his plan halting immigration are biased.</p> <p><a href="http://thedailybanter.com/2017/02/trump-accuses-3-judges-of-political-bias/">http://thedailybanter.com/2017/02/trump-accuses-3-judges-of-political-bias/</a></p> <p>Trump is dangerous. Reporters are giving us details on the depth of his madness. We have to stay focused and separate nonsense from glaring warnings.</p> <p>Edit to add:</p> <p>Reporting tells us that his senior advisor, Steve Bannon, thinks the apocalypse is upon us.</p> <p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/steve-bannon-apocalypse_us_5898f02ee4b040613138a951">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/steve-bannon-apocalypse_us_5898f02ee...</a>?</p> <p>They are feeding each other's psychosis </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 08 Feb 2017 20:20:38 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 233644 at http://dagblog.com Paula: But Charles I saw you http://dagblog.com/comment/233643#comment-233643 <a id="comment-233643"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/233637#comment-233637">This little follow-up in the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0036855/">Paula:<em> But Charles I saw you walking in the hall in a bathrobe</em></a></p> <p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0036855/">Charles:<em> But my poor Paula, I don't own a bathrobe</em></a></p> <p>The followup is most appreciated as I wouldn't know about the elaboration which just adds to the effect to have Thrush explaining to another journalist. Also related: normally I would think it silly to want to followup on this kind of story, all a waste of time while major news is being made elsewhere. But nothing about the current White House is normal. Or is it? Is this all a game to get us all to drop the media and to get our news framed directly from Trump's tweets? Cue your new post "In the News":<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/compost/wp/2017/02/07/i-understand-now-the-trump-administration-is-right-about-everything/?utm_term=.f55c1e1c23fb">I Understand Now!</a></p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 08 Feb 2017 20:00:18 +0000 artappraiser comment 233643 at http://dagblog.com Rereading this gave me an http://dagblog.com/comment/233641#comment-233641 <a id="comment-233641"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/trump-and-staff-rethink-tactics-after-stumbles-21848">Trump and Staff Rethink Tactics After Stumbles</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Rereading this gave me an epiphany ... Mr Trump is so sure of himself and lives in a secured bubble whose purpose is to smooth out the ruffles of every day life that public protests, government officials and judges questioning his motives and the media orchestrating comical spoofs of his efforts is beginning to anger him because he can't use his presidential powers to control their actions.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 08 Feb 2017 19:16:32 +0000 Beetlejuice comment 233641 at http://dagblog.com This little follow-up in the http://dagblog.com/comment/233637#comment-233637 <a id="comment-233637"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/trump-and-staff-rethink-tactics-after-stumbles-21848">Trump and Staff Rethink Tactics After Stumbles</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2017/02/07/nyt-reporter-top-trump-officials-were-presented-with-bathrobe-scoop/?utm_term=.ec9a31e23cff">This little follow-up</a> in the Post is supposed to be, I guess, a sort of "cute" background of the story with Glenn Thrush, focused on Spicer's odd interest in the bathrobe part.  But I found this statement from Thrush a bit disturbing (my bold):</p> <blockquote> <p>“Every single fact in this story, including the bathrobe, by the way,” Thrush told Barbaro, “was presented to two top members of the president’s team 24 hours in advance of publication. <strong>Some of the points they amended and corrected and we changed in the text,</strong> others they agreed with or said it was unobjectionable, others they said they didn’t know about.”</p> <p> </p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Wed, 08 Feb 2017 18:35:45 +0000 barefooted comment 233637 at http://dagblog.com Vanity Fair/Politics/You're http://dagblog.com/comment/233514#comment-233514 <a id="comment-233514"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/trump-and-staff-rethink-tactics-after-stumbles-21848">Trump and Staff Rethink Tactics After Stumbles</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Vanity Fair/Politics/You're Fired (so cavaet: could be some 'fake news' in here, but generally is a fairly extensive roundup and analysis of what MSM has had to say):</p> <p><a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/02/whos-winning-and-losing-the-white-house-apprentice">WHO’S WINNING, AND LOSING, THE WHITE HOUSE <em>APPRENTICE</em>?</a></p> <p><a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/02/whos-winning-and-losing-the-white-house-apprentice">Advisers continue to jockey for power in the West Wing. So who is on top?</a></p> <p>By Emily Jane Fox, Feb. 6</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 07 Feb 2017 02:54:47 +0000 artappraiser comment 233514 at http://dagblog.com A shower of knives going in http://dagblog.com/comment/233490#comment-233490 <a id="comment-233490"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/233482#comment-233482">Amazing article.  Some</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>A shower of knives going in every direction. I pride myself on having learned some decoding of reporter language on leaks. I can't figure a damn thing out here, it's total chaos.</p> <p>Only one thing for sure: Glenn Thrush is journalism's new IT BOY! First he's a star character in <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWuc18xISwI">Melissa McCarthy's genius Saturday Night Live parody of a White House briefing</a>, and then his phone starts ringing off the hook. </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 06 Feb 2017 21:27:51 +0000 artappraiser comment 233490 at http://dagblog.com Amazing article.  Some http://dagblog.com/comment/233482#comment-233482 <a id="comment-233482"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/trump-and-staff-rethink-tactics-after-stumbles-21848">Trump and Staff Rethink Tactics After Stumbles</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Amazing article.  Some serious leaking going on at 1600 PA Ave.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 06 Feb 2017 18:32:43 +0000 Bruce Levine comment 233482 at http://dagblog.com