dagblog - Comments for "Audio Link to Ninth Circuit Oral Argument on Stay of Executive Order" http://dagblog.com/link/audio-link-ninth-circuit-oral-argument-stay-executive-order-21870 Comments for "Audio Link to Ninth Circuit Oral Argument on Stay of Executive Order" en (No subject) http://dagblog.com/comment/233629#comment-233629 <a id="comment-233629"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/233619#comment-233619">This is a great collection of</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><img alt="yes" height="23" src="http://cdn.ckeditor.com/4.5.6/full-all/plugins/smiley/images/thumbs_up.png" title="yes" width="23" /></p> </div></div></div> Wed, 08 Feb 2017 17:10:43 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 233629 at http://dagblog.com This is a great collection of http://dagblog.com/comment/233619#comment-233619 <a id="comment-233619"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/233590#comment-233590">Thanks for this. I would</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>This is a <a href="http://lawfareblog.com/litigation-documents-resources-related-trump-executive-order-immigration">great collection of documents </a>from all of the cases, including the one in the 9th circuit, challenging the president's executive order.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 08 Feb 2017 15:01:43 +0000 Bruce Levine comment 233619 at http://dagblog.com Honestly don't follow too http://dagblog.com/comment/233592#comment-233592 <a id="comment-233592"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/233590#comment-233590">Thanks for this. I would</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Honestly don't follow too many legal blogs, but I've been reading <a href="http://www.lawfareblog.com">this one a bit</a> for information about this immigration dispute. </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:51:06 +0000 Bruce Levine comment 233592 at http://dagblog.com To answer my own question, http://dagblog.com/comment/233589#comment-233589 <a id="comment-233589"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/233587#comment-233587">The 1952 Immgration law:</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>To answer my own question, what or why the administration did the ban would come out if this went to trial and 'discovery'.</p> <p>Right now they are determining whether to leave the stay in place.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:17:14 +0000 NCD comment 233589 at http://dagblog.com Thanks for this. I would http://dagblog.com/comment/233590#comment-233590 <a id="comment-233590"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/audio-link-ninth-circuit-oral-argument-stay-executive-order-21870">Audio Link to Ninth Circuit Oral Argument on Stay of Executive Order</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks for this. I would certainly have missed it and I am glad I didn't. I'll be looking forward to the coming legal commentary including yours. The Only place I regularly go is Jonathan <a href="https://jonathanturley.org/">Turley's</a> blog. Any recommendations? </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:16:36 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 233590 at http://dagblog.com The 1952 Immgration law: http://dagblog.com/comment/233587#comment-233587 <a id="comment-233587"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/audio-link-ninth-circuit-oral-argument-stay-executive-order-21870">Audio Link to Ninth Circuit Oral Argument on Stay of Executive Order</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The 1952 Immgration law:</p> <blockquote> <p>Whenever the president <u>finds</u> that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation....</p> </blockquote> <p>Trump - did he find or claim?</p> <p>There is no evidence these visa holders were found by Trump to be detrimental. They were claimed so with nothing to back it up. I haven't heard this point argued.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 07 Feb 2017 23:27:57 +0000 NCD comment 233587 at http://dagblog.com Counsel for both sides and http://dagblog.com/comment/233586#comment-233586 <a id="comment-233586"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/233585#comment-233585">Hi JR. Feel a bit silly</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Counsel for both sides and one judge appearing by phone.  </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 07 Feb 2017 23:05:15 +0000 Bruce Levine comment 233586 at http://dagblog.com Hi JR. Feel a bit silly http://dagblog.com/comment/233585#comment-233585 <a id="comment-233585"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/233566#comment-233566">Maybe this will encourage the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hi JR. Feel a bit silly because CNN is apparently having the audio on live as well.  </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 07 Feb 2017 22:59:18 +0000 Bruce Levine comment 233585 at http://dagblog.com Maybe this will encourage the http://dagblog.com/comment/233566#comment-233566 <a id="comment-233566"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/audio-link-ninth-circuit-oral-argument-stay-executive-order-21870">Audio Link to Ninth Circuit Oral Argument on Stay of Executive Order</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Maybe this will encourage the SC to at least livestream audio  feed in real time.  </p> <p> </p> <p>I'm actually sympathetic to their stated disinclination to have the threshold for Justice facial recognition capacity lowered from it's present (really modest) level of intellectual competence to include the no print/TV watching only cohort of their fellow citizens.</p> <p> </p> <p>O/T Hi Bruce.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 07 Feb 2017 21:22:29 +0000 jollyroger comment 233566 at http://dagblog.com