dagblog - Comments for "A Unanimous "No""

Also, I see here that he is

artappraiser — Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:43:20 +0000

In reply to WASHINGTON — A three-judge

Also, I see here that he is getting some support from the right to keep on being disrespectful of the courts, including Huckabee on Fox News and talk radio guys dittoing that:

http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/when-presidents-think-about-defying-the-courts

Well, I've got to give him

artappraiser — Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:17:42 +0000

In reply to WASHINGTON — A three-judge

Well, I've got to give him the benefit on this one because that is not a trollish tweet. He actually thought about it before he posted it? Or it was ghost written....whatever... If he continues to act so grown-up, that could be even worse than he is now?

WASHINGTON — A three-judge

barefooted — Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:03:11 +0000

In reply to A Unanimous "No"

WASHINGTON — A three-judge federal appeals panel on Thursday unanimously refused to reinstate President Trump’s targeted travel ban, delivering the latest and most stinging judicial rebuke to his effort to make good on a campaign promise and tighten the standards for entry into the United States.

And it seems Trump was immediately not amused:

Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump

SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!

5:35 PM - 9 Feb 2017