dagblog - Comments for "NY Times: How traditional news survives?"

Interesting article. I think

ocean-kat — Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:32:48 +0000

In reply to NY Times: How traditional news survives?

Interesting article. I think we have a responsibility to support journalism but since I don't have a lot of money I chose one site to subscribe to, the NYT. None of the innovative techniques they discussed mean anything to me. I just want the news. But I hope they work.

The system is flawed when companies that produce no content get such a large share of the advertising dollars for simply finding or sharing the content that others produce. I hope the good news sites can figure out some way to capture those dollars and support the journalists that actually do the work.

Re: Maybe they're

artappraiser — Wed, 15 Feb 2017 19:29:38 +0000

In reply to NY Times: How traditional news survives?

Re: Maybe *they're* engineering everything.

Prescient of you to say this. The thought just came into my mind that dagblog commenter "Peter" and friends like him in the internet, along with your basic populi Trump fans, might be pushing that narrative to us shortly. In the end, the "there's a massive conspiracy with these elites running the world", whether it be "the media", Trilateral Commission or the U.N. with its black helicopters or the Masons, makes for strange bedfellows in rocky unstable times. It might be a first time, though, that a billionaire real estate investor is seen as a victim of the overlords running our planet?

dagblog - Comments for "NY Times: How traditional news survives?"

Interesting article. I think

Re: Maybe *they're*

Re: Maybe they're