dagblog - Comments for "Trump Voters Are Not the Enemy" http://dagblog.com/link/trump-voters-are-not-enemy-21999 Comments for "Trump Voters Are Not the Enemy" en Mike... Moving on . . . http://dagblog.com/comment/234577#comment-234577 <a id="comment-234577"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/234574#comment-234574">OGD, focusing on independents</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em><strong>Mike... Moving on . . .</strong></em></p> <p>I don't even want to broach the subject of Bernie... I'm way down the road from that.</p> <blockquote> <p><em>"...they need to focus on creating a broad realignment that will move party lines across the board. That's what Republicans achieved, and that's why they have become the majority party."</em></p> </blockquote> <p>Just make sure and take a look at my latest post.</p> <p><a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/redistricting-fight-states-22008">Redistricting: The Fight for the States</a></p> <p>It's gonna be a long hard slog, but it's gotta be done.</p> <p>~OGD~</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 25 Feb 2017 17:45:23 +0000 oldenGoldenDecoy comment 234577 at http://dagblog.com They achieved success in http://dagblog.com/comment/234576#comment-234576 <a id="comment-234576"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/234526#comment-234526">All the issues to point to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>They achieved success in spite of alienating moderates, not because of it, which is why Democrats shouldn't be so worried about creating a radical platform that may alienate moderates.</p> <p>The issues I mentioned appealed to many people who we now call "the right" but who once thought of themselves as pro-labor progressives and voted Democrat. Of course, we need to emphasize different issues that are in line with progressivism and tolerance. White, black, rich, poor, it doesn't matter, but we need to win over people who voted for Trump and who voted for Republican representatives if we hope to rebuild a strong Democratic majority.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 25 Feb 2017 17:33:00 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 234576 at http://dagblog.com OGD, focusing on independents http://dagblog.com/comment/234574#comment-234574 <a id="comment-234574"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/234538#comment-234538"> </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>OGD, focusing on independents can win individual elections, but it's not a good long term strategy. You need to nurture consistent, reliable voters who vote Democrat up and down the ticket (and reduce the number of people who vote Republican up and down the ticket).</p> <p>That's not to say that Democrats shouldn't go after independents. They should, but they need to focus on creating a broad realignment that will move party lines across the board. That's what Republicans achieved, and that's why they have become the majority party.</p> <p>I absolutely agree with Ganz's opinion that you need a story about the future, though I don't necessarily agree with him that Bernie has it. Bernie has a story, but I think it's more about the past than the future. Sadly, I don't have a story myself. </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 25 Feb 2017 17:20:00 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 234574 at http://dagblog.com P,.S. They don't even have to http://dagblog.com/comment/234560#comment-234560 <a id="comment-234560"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/234559#comment-234559">I think some of that myth</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>P,.S. They don't even have to be Democrats or liberals, just sane about guns. Like the majority of police officers or ex-military who are rational human beings.Those attracted to the N.R.A. bullshit are the types that the latter would try to lock up should the apocalypse come in order to restore law and order.The N.R.A. is actually anti-government libertarian, anti law and order, the second amendment is the only law they care about.Their goddamn argument every time some gun related disaster happens that if everyone else had been packing it would have been fine must drive rational gun owners nuts.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 25 Feb 2017 14:43:12 +0000 artappraiser comment 234560 at http://dagblog.com I think some of that myth http://dagblog.com/comment/234559#comment-234559 <a id="comment-234559"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/234553#comment-234553">It&#039;s a myth that only the far</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>I think some of that myth comes from the NRA and republicans convincing people that democrats want to ban guns and take away the guns people have. Therefore the gun nuts think democrats don't have guns. </em></p> <p>Excellent point.</p> <p>I can't imagine how frustrating it must be for gun afficianados who are rational enough to be anti-NRA. And to actually have to interact with these nut cases all the time while pursuing their hobby at shows and the like.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 25 Feb 2017 14:33:57 +0000 artappraiser comment 234559 at http://dagblog.com It's a myth that only the far http://dagblog.com/comment/234553#comment-234553 <a id="comment-234553"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/234551#comment-234551">Trumpkins &quot;have the guns&quot;,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It's a myth that only the far right or only republicans have guns and that liberals don't. I hear it all the time. I saw a video of one of the gun nuts at the Bundy encampment in Oregon who said, paraphrasing, that we're going to have a civil war but we, i.e. the far right, doesn't have to worry about the liberals because they don't have any guns.</p> <p>I think some of that myth comes from the NRA and republicans convincing people that democrats want to ban guns and take away the guns people have. Therefore the gun nuts think democrats don't have guns. Democrats don't want to ban guns. We just want what we see as sensible gun control. Some of the regulations we want are <a href="https://thinkprogress.org/the-5-gun-safety-regulations-that-even-nra-members-support-dbdba203a471#.hj8uwlw40">supported by NRA members</a>. The most far right gun nuts don't speak for all gun owners or for all NRA members.</p> <p>There are large numbers of hunters that are democrats. Sure many have been convinced by the lies and have moved to the republicans but there are still many who vote democrat. I'm a far left liberal and I hunt and own  guns. I know many liberals as far left as me that own guns. My father and many of his friends are moderate democrats and they own guns.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 25 Feb 2017 09:48:05 +0000 ocean-kat comment 234553 at http://dagblog.com   http://dagblog.com/comment/234538#comment-234538 <a id="comment-234538"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/234518#comment-234518">&quot;building a party platform</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p> <p><em><strong>Hey... Mike... I know you realize  . . . </strong></em></p> <p>It's really the nonpartisan independents to "attract and galvanize" coupled with hard work to get out the vote on the Dem side.</p> <blockquote> <p>So I suggest that Democrats don't need a platform that everyone in the party can agree on. They need radical and exciting ideas to attract and galvanize voters from both sides of the aisle.</p> </blockquote> <p>And what's your list of radical and exciting ideas to attract voters?</p> <p>As Marshall Ganz <a href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/cafe/can-the-democrats-get-organized">said over here</a>...</p> <blockquote> <p>You need a story about a future that can be built based on democratic values.</p> </blockquote> <p>Can you expand on your thoughts on these four basic political positions?</p> <p>Economic, Social, Legal, and Foreign policy issues</p> <p>~OGD~</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 25 Feb 2017 09:26:56 +0000 oldenGoldenDecoy comment 234538 at http://dagblog.com Trumpkins "have the guns", http://dagblog.com/comment/234551#comment-234551 <a id="comment-234551"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/trump-voters-are-not-enemy-21999">Trump Voters Are Not the Enemy</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Trumpkins "have the guns", and are also killing themselves off with Meth. Their predicament is truly tragic (unlike Trump's "fake tragic") but we can't save them all. </div></div></div> Sat, 25 Feb 2017 08:20:22 +0000 harsh reality comment 234551 at http://dagblog.com I share DNA with several, and http://dagblog.com/comment/234543#comment-234543 <a id="comment-234543"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/trump-voters-are-not-enemy-21999">Trump Voters Are Not the Enemy</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I share DNA with several, and I am sufficiently ashamed thereby that I won't divulge exactly how much of the genomes in question devolve from how near a shared ancestor...</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 25 Feb 2017 05:06:53 +0000 jollyroger comment 234543 at http://dagblog.com Trump made a direct assault http://dagblog.com/comment/234535#comment-234535 <a id="comment-234535"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/234526#comment-234526">All the issues to point to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Trump made a direct assault on the media at CPAC today. He is blocking White House reporters. The Trump supporters will not speak out about Trump's action.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 25 Feb 2017 00:42:21 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 234535 at http://dagblog.com