http://dagblog.com/link/jeff-sessions-james-okeefe-salary-22053 Comments for "Jeff Sessions is James O'Keefe (with a salary)" en http://dagblog.com/comment/234916#comment-234916 <a id="comment-234916"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/jeff-sessions-james-okeefe-salary-22053">Jeff Sessions is James O&#039;Keefe (with a salary)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>This article infuriated me for two reasons; first of all, I never realized before what a sleazy, dishonest crook Sessions was (and no doubt, still is).  Secondly, why does the Guardian publish such excellent, resourced articles, and our papers seem to avoid real research?</p> <p>OK, I'm going for #3:  Why wasn't Sessions grilled about these events during his nomination process.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 05 Mar 2017 22:33:02 +0000 CVille Dem comment 234916 at http://dagblog.com http://dagblog.com/comment/234899#comment-234899 <a id="comment-234899"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/jeff-sessions-james-okeefe-salary-22053">Jeff Sessions is James O&#039;Keefe (with a salary)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://youtu.be/8ZM3jvlvgVw">Beauregard Gump &amp; Forrest Trump</a> - the South's gonna do it again. I'd say dumb as a bag of rocks, but as Forrest notes, sometimes you don't got enough rocks.</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed" height="336px" width="598px"><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="336px" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/8ZM3jvlvgVw" width="598px"></iframe></div> </div></div></div> Sun, 05 Mar 2017 15:30:58 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 234899 at http://dagblog.com