dagblog - Comments for "CHAUNCEY OR BORAT" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/chauncey-or-borat-22105 Comments for "CHAUNCEY OR BORAT" en Hi Cville. http://dagblog.com/comment/235475#comment-235475 <a id="comment-235475"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/235379#comment-235379">Hey, driving!  The truth is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hi Cville.</p> <p>I just notified Flower that Being There is one of the greatest films I have ever viewed!</p> <p>There is nothing of redemption with regard to Trump.</p> <p>There is nothing of socially redeeming value about Trump. hahahah (An old definition of porno)</p> <p>Bull in a China shop is the only metaphor I was going for. hahahaha</p> <p>By the way, these new Congressional Hearings are like some new age nutsiness.</p> <p>Trump will never walk on water.</p> <p>Even though I feel that he knows that he can walk on water.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:39:53 +0000 Richard Day comment 235475 at http://dagblog.com Flower, never view Borat for http://dagblog.com/comment/235474#comment-235474 <a id="comment-235474"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/235277#comment-235277">I am at a disadvantage Mr.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Flower, never view Borat for chrissakes. hahahah</p> <p>But you must see, I mean you must see BEING THERE.</p> <p>One of the best movies I have ever, ever seen!</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:31:36 +0000 Richard Day comment 235474 at http://dagblog.com Hey, driving!  The truth is http://dagblog.com/comment/235379#comment-235379 <a id="comment-235379"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/chauncey-or-borat-22105">CHAUNCEY OR BORAT</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hey, dd!  The truth is that if someone had made a movie about a President Trump 10 years ago, no one would like it because it wouldn't have been funny.  Also no one could really get into it because it would have been unbelievable.  Think about the prissy GOP congress, who want to take away women's rights (to save them from themselves) and even the most staunchly Christian among them embraced the pussy grabber because he could deliver what they desire --&gt; power to make the sufferers suffer more.</p> <p>Even Borat wouldn't have done that.  I agree with you about Being There.  It was wonderful, and no one watching the movie could predict anything that would happen because it was so original.  His innocence was something hard to imagine.  Just curious...did you see The Royal Tennenbaums?  I love that movie.  The first time I saw it I laughed a lot.  The second time I was surprised to find myself crying.  The ultimate message was about redemption.  Something trump would probably not be able to imagine.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 18 Mar 2017 13:03:33 +0000 CVille Dem comment 235379 at http://dagblog.com I am at a disadvantage Mr. http://dagblog.com/comment/235277#comment-235277 <a id="comment-235277"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/chauncey-or-borat-22105">CHAUNCEY OR BORAT</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I am at a disadvantage Mr. Day, because I have viewed neither film. Although, Mr. flower recently watched Borat and thought it was hilarious... which makes me think I wouldn't enjoy it at all.</p> <p>I don't know which character is a good metaphor for Trump.</p> <p>However...</p> <p>Lately I have been referring to it as the Clampett White House. I mean, really...dude moves into a big white house and doesn't know how anything works.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 14 Mar 2017 23:23:58 +0000 wabby comment 235277 at http://dagblog.com