dagblog - Comments for "Maddow--Great Teaser or She’s Got Tax Returns" http://dagblog.com/link/maddow-great-teaser-or-she-s-got-tax-returns-22115 Comments for "Maddow--Great Teaser or She’s Got Tax Returns" en Jack Shafer in saying he is http://dagblog.com/comment/235335#comment-235335 <a id="comment-235335"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/235293#comment-235293">Rachel&#039;s got some &#039;splaining</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/maddow-trump-tax-returns-214914">Jack Shafer in saying he is okay with what she did, basically speaks quite well for me on her major downsides</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>[....] So why am I fine with Maddow’s tax-story grandstanding? Oh, I could do without the maddening community theater dramatics she brings to every show—the eye-rolling, the sarcasm, the faux earnestness, the annoyingly conversational style that assumes that you’re a passenger on her news bus. But there’s a long sensationalist tradition in American journalism of using a <a href="http://www.bennettmachine.com/prod.html" target="_blank">400-ton metal stamping machine</a> to extract every drop of juice out of an important scoop, then grinding the remaining pulp and feeding those tailings to the audience.</p> <p>Unlike your standard <em>bad </em>sensational news story, Maddow’s puffed-up piece contained no mention of sex, no bloody murder, no crime and no violated social norm. She took a timely story of great importance—do we have evidence that Trump is a tax cheat?—and answered it. Well, answered it repeatedly in the negative, but I don’t hold the repetition against her, either. If Trump appears to have been on the level when it comes to his 2005 taxes, that’s good to know, even if you don’t like him.</p> <p>I’m even fine with all of Maddow and Johnston’s heavy conjecture about how Trump’s 2005 tax return might fit into the Russia puzzle, or should I say question, of whether he’s captive of Russian oligarchs.  As the late <em>Times</em>man Tom Wicker once wrote, and I can’t stop <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/2014/10/31/in-covering-politics-a-little-speculation-aint-a-bad-thing/" target="_blank">repeating</a>, a little speculation can help unstick a political story from the mire and move it to realms where new proof can be gathered, and the story advanced. [....]</p> </blockquote> <p>I especially don't cotton to the "passenger on her news bus" thing, because it's just like Limbaugh: lecture, lecture, lecture with mega drama added....she is much more palatable when she has guests to interview. It's the drama queen thing I guess bothers me the most, as Lawrence O'Donnell lecturing on his show doesn't turn me off in the least.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 16 Mar 2017 05:24:13 +0000 artappraiser comment 235335 at http://dagblog.com Watching rerun of Rachel's http://dagblog.com/comment/235332#comment-235332 <a id="comment-235332"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/maddow-great-teaser-or-she-s-got-tax-returns-22115">Maddow--Great Teaser or She’s Got Tax Returns</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Watching rerun of Rachel's show tonight and she is not doing a mea culpa but is attempting to defend by explaining why this is still interesting.</p> <p>Both reasons she has given so far solve the mystery for me of why such a high personal income claim with high payment of taxes when it is likely that through planning and accounting, he didn't need to claim so much personal income</p> <ul><li>it is the first joint return with Melania and she is not yet been granted citizenship, and she will need to use this tax return in the final process, which was successful</li> <li>he was involved in a lawsuit challenging a guy who was claiming he was no longer a billionaire if he ever was one, with a lot of facts to back that up. Trump used this tax return in that case and his reputation as a billionaire is crucial to him, his "brand" that allows him to do what he does</li> </ul><p>M</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 16 Mar 2017 04:39:13 +0000 artappraiser comment 235332 at http://dagblog.com My weakness! http://dagblog.com/comment/235315#comment-235315 <a id="comment-235315"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/235308#comment-235308">Bruce... those shiny objects.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>My weakness!</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:22:38 +0000 Bruce Levine comment 235315 at http://dagblog.com Bruce... those shiny objects. http://dagblog.com/comment/235308#comment-235308 <a id="comment-235308"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/235289#comment-235289">Absolutely agree with you OGD</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><strong>Bruce...</strong> <em><strong>oh those shiny objects...</strong></em></p> <p><img alt="" height="136" src="http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e66/LarrytheDuck/tumblr_inline_ofkvoeBO4Y1shrb8p_500_zpsfnmbyywo.gif" width="250" /></p> <p>~OGD~</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 15 Mar 2017 21:29:25 +0000 oldenGoldenDecoy comment 235308 at http://dagblog.com Lots of splainin' IMO.  http://dagblog.com/comment/235301#comment-235301 <a id="comment-235301"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/235293#comment-235293">Rachel&#039;s got some &#039;splaining</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Lots of splainin' IMO. </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:11:10 +0000 Bruce Levine comment 235301 at http://dagblog.com Maddow is awful, as Daily http://dagblog.com/comment/235299#comment-235299 <a id="comment-235299"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/235293#comment-235293">Rachel&#039;s got some &#039;splaining</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Maddow is awful, as Daily Howler points out over and over. She's a child in a grownup seat, never managing to take the news she's pimping seriously, always going for the gags. Perfect foil for Trump.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:55:57 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 235299 at http://dagblog.com Rachel's got some 'splaining http://dagblog.com/comment/235293#comment-235293 <a id="comment-235293"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/maddow-great-teaser-or-she-s-got-tax-returns-22115">Maddow--Great Teaser or She’s Got Tax Returns</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Rachel's got some 'splaining to do to her colleagues <img alt="wink" height="23" src="http://cdn.ckeditor.com/4.5.6/full-all/plugins/smiley/images/wink_smile.png" title="wink" width="23" /></p> <p><a href="https://www.axios.com/taking-the-bait-2315174269.html">The mental opportunity cost of taking Trump's bait</a> by Mike Allen @ Axios.com, March 15</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:59:54 +0000 artappraiser comment 235293 at http://dagblog.com Trump probably leaked this http://dagblog.com/comment/235292#comment-235292 <a id="comment-235292"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/maddow-great-teaser-or-she-s-got-tax-returns-22115">Maddow--Great Teaser or She’s Got Tax Returns</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Trump probably leaked this nonsense to divert from Russian ties, a disastrous health care bill, emoluments clause violations, racist Steve King who walks in lockstep with Steve Bannon, and Obama microwaves, etc. </p> <p>Edit to add:</p> <p>And the Kushner deal.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:55:28 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 235292 at http://dagblog.com Sorry I didn't see this last http://dagblog.com/comment/235288#comment-235288 <a id="comment-235288"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/235283#comment-235283">And it&#039;s just his 1040?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Sorry I didn't see this last night AA, and you're absolutely correct that the form without the schedules is not worth much, not to mention the distinction you point out between one's personal taxes and its relationship to one or more corporations.  In Trump's case (and I'm no expert), I understand he and his kids have myriad what in NY are called LLCs, or <a href="http://smallbusiness.findlaw.com/incorporation-and-legal-structures/limited-liability-corporation-faq.html">"limited liability corporation (or company)."</a>  That obviously makes his stand-alone personal return even less useful.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 15 Mar 2017 11:51:19 +0000 Bruce Levine comment 235288 at http://dagblog.com Absolutely agree with you OGD http://dagblog.com/comment/235289#comment-235289 <a id="comment-235289"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/235286#comment-235286">One... BIG....</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Absolutely agree with you OGD, a distraction at most.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 15 Mar 2017 11:50:48 +0000 Bruce Levine comment 235289 at http://dagblog.com