dagblog - Comments for "I was going to filibus......" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/i-was-going-filibus-22247 Comments for "I was going to filibus......" en This http://talkingpointsmemo http://dagblog.com/comment/236369#comment-236369 <a id="comment-236369"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/236360#comment-236360">Since this only ends filib&#039;s</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>This <a href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/opposing-a-corrupt-transaction">http</a><a href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/opposing-a-corrupt-transaction">://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/opposing-a-corrupt-transaction</a>  gives some good historical information about use/and fake use of the filibuster by Josh Marshall.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sun, 09 Apr 2017 13:47:53 +0000 CVille Dem comment 236369 at http://dagblog.com The Republicans have http://dagblog.com/comment/236364#comment-236364 <a id="comment-236364"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/236361#comment-236361">PS: I&#039;d have been happy to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The Republicans have filibustered recently, only the Dems let them skip all the blustery all-night talking part, presumably so they could get home and wash their BMWs.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:54:37 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 236364 at http://dagblog.com PS: I'd have been happy to http://dagblog.com/comment/236361#comment-236361 <a id="comment-236361"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/236360#comment-236360">Since this only ends filib&#039;s</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>PS: I'd have been happy to let the DEM's use it - just with the proviso that it be an honest to goodness talking filib. That's have been pretty interesting IMHO.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 09 Apr 2017 09:11:17 +0000 Contrarian comment 236361 at http://dagblog.com Since this only ends filib's http://dagblog.com/comment/236360#comment-236360 <a id="comment-236360"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/i-was-going-filibus-22247">I was going to filibus......</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Since this only ends filib's for SCOTUS noms &amp; nothing else, I have to ask: has a SCOTUS nom ever been filib'd before? I could be wrong, but I believe that this was the first time. So, this doesn't actually 'end' any problem of procedural obstruction. Rather it stopped one before it could do any harm.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 09 Apr 2017 09:09:19 +0000 Contrarian comment 236360 at http://dagblog.com I recall Jim Allen as Senator http://dagblog.com/comment/236190#comment-236190 <a id="comment-236190"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/236189#comment-236189">Agreed. Nice take here: https</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I recall Jim Allen as Senator was talked about in glowing terms for reviving the filibuster. I'd probably be disgusted to review what he was filibustering.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 06 Apr 2017 15:58:40 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 236190 at http://dagblog.com Agreed. Nice take here: https http://dagblog.com/comment/236189#comment-236189 <a id="comment-236189"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/236118#comment-236118">This is probably a good thing</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Agreed. Nice take here: <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/04/filibuster/522135/">https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/04/filibuster/522135/</a></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 06 Apr 2017 15:50:41 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 236189 at http://dagblog.com This is probably a good thing http://dagblog.com/comment/236118#comment-236118 <a id="comment-236118"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/i-was-going-filibus-22247">I was going to filibus......</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>This is probably a good thing more long-term for the legislative process and governmental sclerosis generally. </p> <p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/05/us/politics/filibuster-gorsuch-nomination-republicans.html?_r=0">https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/05/us/politics/filibuster-gorsuch-nomination-republicans.html?_r=0</a></p> <p>It's a shame democrats didn't get rid of the filibuster 8 years ago</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 05 Apr 2017 09:59:10 +0000 Obey comment 236118 at http://dagblog.com