For all the shade that gets

jollyroger — Thu, 06 Apr 2017 18:07:10 +0000

For all the shade that gets thrown on Mensch, she always seems pretty plausible to me, which is perhaps diagnostic of my disturbed (ed note:chemically perturbed?) relationship with reality.

The March 4 twitterstorm scenario she lays out is really one of the better variations I've seen, particularly as it avoids the rather flimsy Levin via Breitbart as catalyst rationale, because that requires the prior ignorance by Trump of Levin's ravings. Pervasive Ignorance by Trump in general, yes, but he is up to date on real and imagined occasions of lese majeste.

Also, the Chilis!

PS - think of this when

PeraclesPlease — Thu, 06 Apr 2017 14:19:09 +0000

In reply to Were Trump, Kushner recorded? Patribotics for review

PS - think of this when pondering Flynn asking for immunity & Nunes now stepping down.

I'd guess Bannon's gone for the same reason Manafort was axed - when Trump runs into problems, he ditches people. Hell, he says he wouldn't even recognize close business bud Felix Sater. But when those folks see themselves in the crosshairs, well, they will cut a deal. Even Roger Stone.

For Nunes, he's guilty of obstruction of justice, leaking information on a confidential investigation to an investigatee. We don't have immunity in Congress, so why isn't he in jail? Because.... the time's not right. But "not now" doesn't mean "not ever", and time's moving quicker and quicker aboard the Trump Express.

dagblog - Comments for "Were Trump, Kushner recorded? Patribotics for review"

For all the shade that gets

PS - think of this when