dagblog - Comments for "Democratic Syria hawks love Trump&#039;s airstrikes" http://dagblog.com/link/democratic-syria-hawks-love-trumps-airstrikes-22272 Comments for "Democratic Syria hawks love Trump's airstrikes" en Chemical weapons are heinous. http://dagblog.com/comment/236405#comment-236405 <a id="comment-236405"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/236402#comment-236402">Chemical weapons are an</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Chemical weapons are heinous. I simply don't trust Trump. The Russians got a heads up on the airfield attack. They did not object to bombing the airfield despite the fact that Putin says Assad had nothing to do with the Sarin attack. Russians now say they are fortifying air defenses. The Tomahawks were launched from ships. I think we are being played for fools.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 10 Apr 2017 15:53:22 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 236405 at http://dagblog.com Chemical weapons are an http://dagblog.com/comment/236406#comment-236406 <a id="comment-236406"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/236402#comment-236402">Chemical weapons are an</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Chemical weapons are an extremely low cost way of putting yourself and country on the blacklist/enemy list above every rogue state in the world, even above nuke producers since those are invariably bluffing about using their devices, while chemical use is common enough and abhorred.</p> <p>The only reason I could see Assad using them is if he already thought the greater powers were going to attempt regime change and this was his way of telling them it would get quite ugly. But the sequence of events appears quite the opposite.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 10 Apr 2017 15:48:13 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 236406 at http://dagblog.com Chemical weapons are an http://dagblog.com/comment/236402#comment-236402 <a id="comment-236402"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/236378#comment-236378">The area The was gassed is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Chemical weapons are an extremely low cost way of causing mass casualties and apparently have a special terror-inducing feature to boot. There is something to be said for drawing a line at their use. I don't think it is completely arbitrary. If the west decides to indicate that parties every low-intensity conflict in developing countries can use chemical weapons without consequences, then that is going to make the world a much more dangerous place. </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 10 Apr 2017 15:11:15 +0000 Obey comment 236402 at http://dagblog.com I think in Kosovo the big http://dagblog.com/comment/236393#comment-236393 <a id="comment-236393"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/236377#comment-236377">Comes to mind that a refugee</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think in Kosovo the big refugee rush happened after, in *response* to US bombing threats, in which Milosevic the fox surprised us by uprooting all the Kosovar civilians and sent them packing for the borders.</p> <p>But our ability to leave millions of refugees in another country, not resolving the issue for decades, makes taking in new refugees a rather poison pill. </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:01:36 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 236393 at http://dagblog.com ... Czech Amb. to the U.S. http://dagblog.com/comment/236392#comment-236392 <a id="comment-236392"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/democratic-syria-hawks-love-trumps-airstrikes-22272">Democratic Syria hawks love Trump&#039;s airstrikes</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p>... Czech Amb. to the U.S. Hynek Kmoníček told Czech TV on Thur. that there is not a single logical reason for Bashar al-Assad to carry out something like a chemical-weapons attack three days after receiving everything he was yearning for all this time (a change in U.S. policy on removing him). "Assad is everything," Kmoníček said, "except an illogical crazy man." Asked if he didn't think Assad had motivation to carry out such an attack, Kmoníček said he sees lots of motivation on the part of others. That's about as close as a diplomat of an EU/Nato country can get to saying that Assad might have been framed by a rogue group that wanted to reverse Trump's policy of tolerance toward the Syrian leader.</p> <p>- <a href="http://www.fsfinalword.com/?page=latest-issue">Erik Best, FleetSheet (Final Word)</a></p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:44:20 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 236392 at http://dagblog.com McCain: Trump administration http://dagblog.com/comment/236389#comment-236389 <a id="comment-236389"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/democratic-syria-hawks-love-trumps-airstrikes-22272">Democratic Syria hawks love Trump&#039;s airstrikes</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><div> <p><a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2017/04/john-mccain-trump-administration-blame-syria-chemical-attacks-237042">McCain: Trump administration 'partially to blame' for Syrian chemical attack</a></p> <p>By POLITICO Staff, 04/09</p> </div> </div></div></div> Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:26:58 +0000 artappraiser comment 236389 at http://dagblog.com Trump tweets that the reason http://dagblog.com/comment/236386#comment-236386 <a id="comment-236386"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/democratic-syria-hawks-love-trumps-airstrikes-22272">Democratic Syria hawks love Trump&#039;s airstrikes</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Trump tweets the reason the runway in Syria was not hit, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-defends-decision-hit-runway-syrian-airbase/story?id=46677805">@ ABC News</a></p> </div></div></div> Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:11:12 +0000 artappraiser comment 236386 at http://dagblog.com Also see WaPo Fact Checker: http://dagblog.com/comment/236384#comment-236384 <a id="comment-236384"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/236373#comment-236373">Trump’s Syria Strike Has Some</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><div>Also see WaPo Fact Checker: <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2017/04/09/ryan-and-mcconnell-flip-flop-on-the-use-of-force-in-syria-to-deter-chemical-weapons/?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_fact-checker-12p%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&amp;utm_term=.9f5f7ca0c6b3">Ryan and McConnell flip-flop on use of force in Syria to deter chemical weapons</a></div> </div></div></div> Sun, 09 Apr 2017 17:43:08 +0000 artappraiser comment 236384 at http://dagblog.com Steve Coll @ The New Yorker: http://dagblog.com/comment/236383#comment-236383 <a id="comment-236383"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/236367#comment-236367">Alt-right who feel betrayed,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/04/17/trumps-confusing-strike-on-syria">Steve Coll @ The New Yorker<u> labels it "confusing" and says<em>: </em></u></a><em><u><em>If President Trump broadens his aims </em></u>against Assad, he will enter the very morass that Candidate Trump warned against.</em></p> </div></div></div> Sun, 09 Apr 2017 17:33:30 +0000 artappraiser comment 236383 at http://dagblog.com That's a pretty simplistic http://dagblog.com/comment/236379#comment-236379 <a id="comment-236379"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/236371#comment-236371">A reminder that Trump has</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That's a pretty simplistic similarity. Clinton didn't spend a ton of time on diplomacy before any strikes? Remember the Dayton Accords, the days of negotiation leading up to Kosovo, the *inaction* in Rwanda, the years of Iraq overflights and UN wheedling before the Iraq strike, etc, etc, and (most?) everything was with international cooperation.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 09 Apr 2017 15:45:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 236379 at http://dagblog.com