dagblog - Comments for "Syria: Neocons Get Almost Giddy" http://dagblog.com/link/syria-neocons-get-almost-giddy-22276 Comments for "Syria: Neocons Get Almost Giddy" en It's okay, Mike Flynn called http://dagblog.com/comment/236427#comment-236427 <a id="comment-236427"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/236424#comment-236424">When the Russians got the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It's okay, Mike Flynn called them and explained,and they were all copacetic. See, these backchannels are useful despite all the scuttlebutt and naysaying.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 11 Apr 2017 07:01:51 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 236427 at http://dagblog.com Hee hee hee - "not a good http://dagblog.com/comment/236425#comment-236425 <a id="comment-236425"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/236414#comment-236414">I do not consider The Daily</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hee hee hee - "not a g<span style="font-size:13px">ood</span><span style="font-size:13px"> site for accuracy and evenhandedness" -that earns 2 Alanis Morisettes.</span></p> <p><a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/03/29/u-s-bombs-syrian-village-and-shrugs.html">More on Syria bombing.</a> Also mentions repeated use of chlorine over several weeks.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 11 Apr 2017 05:06:29 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 236425 at http://dagblog.com When the Russians got the http://dagblog.com/comment/236424#comment-236424 <a id="comment-236424"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/syria-neocons-get-almost-giddy-22276">Syria: Neocons Get Almost Giddy</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>When the Russians got the call that the base was going to be attacked, they just said "OK, no problem. We are leaving right now?" The Russians offered no resistance? The US magically knew that the Russians wouldn't stay and dare the US to attack?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 11 Apr 2017 04:41:45 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 236424 at http://dagblog.com Limited duscussion of the http://dagblog.com/comment/236423#comment-236423 <a id="comment-236423"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/236416#comment-236416">I&#039;d rate the Daily Beast with</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Limited duscussion of the removal of chemical weapons that Kerry-Putin brokered a few years back - a black point against Russia, anoth example of Obama's fecklessness, or just a data point sacrificed to history and the rush to war.</p> <p>Can I believe the cartoon guy *AND* the journalist? I found a particularly pleasant fence post to sit on (perhaps TMI...)</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 11 Apr 2017 04:39:18 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 236423 at http://dagblog.com In the wind- http://dagblog.com/comment/236422#comment-236422 <a id="comment-236422"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/236421#comment-236421">Actually, I think on the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>In the wind-</p> <p>1. Destroy Obamacare.</p> <p>2. Destroy Kim Jong Il</p> <p>3. Destroy ISIS. And whatever comes after it, and after that.....and...</p> <p>4. Destroy Medicaid.</p> <p>5. Destroy Taxes on 1%, living or recently living.</p> <p>6. Blowout the deficit.</p> <p>7. Destroy right to vote.</p> <p>8. Destroy Medicare and SS.</p> <p>9. Federalize police forces.</p> <p>10. Destroy Democratic Party.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 11 Apr 2017 04:13:48 +0000 NCD comment 236422 at http://dagblog.com Actually, I think on the http://dagblog.com/comment/236421#comment-236421 <a id="comment-236421"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/236420#comment-236420">Still on the fence. Are you</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Actually, I think on the fence is a reasonable place to be right now. But, some strong winds may be coming.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 11 Apr 2017 02:28:58 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 236421 at http://dagblog.com Still on the fence. Are you http://dagblog.com/comment/236420#comment-236420 <a id="comment-236420"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/236419#comment-236419">..I am....on the fence...the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Still on the fence. Are you going to be the 555,000,001 follower of the cartoon guy? A joke of course. The idea that the Dilbert cartoonist is cogitating over the actions of an hereditary despot in a nation the despot helped destroy in the Middle East, and is followed by thousands if not millions, I find as a dumbing down of critical thinking in the vox populi.</p> <p>Anyway, we can be sure that Trump is probably even less qualified to figure out what is going on in Syria than almost anyone, even among us here.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 11 Apr 2017 02:17:29 +0000 NCD comment 236420 at http://dagblog.com ..I am....on the fence...the http://dagblog.com/comment/236419#comment-236419 <a id="comment-236419"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/236415#comment-236415">Scott Adams deduced the gas</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <p>..I am....on the fence...the cartoon guy or the mideast correspondent.....?</p> </blockquote> <p>False choice. The cartoon guy clearly identifies his conclusion as what it is, an opinion based on reasoning. Gutman has his critics and they see the same weaknesses as I do in his reporting on this particular subject. From Wikipedia:</p> <blockquote> <p>In 2017, Gutman was criticized for writing fake and biased reports about the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_civil_war" title="Syrian civil war">Syrian civil war</a>, particularly against the Syrian Kurds. Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi, research fellow at the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_East_Forum" title="Middle East Forum">Middle East Forum</a> stated that "Gutman’s opinion biases have had and still have a problematic impact on his reporting". According to Al-Tamimi, the problem with Gutman’s work is his biases for the Syrian opposition and Turkey that have been evident for years.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Gutman#cite_note-5">[5]</a> </p> </blockquote> <p>From Syria Comment:</p> <p><a href="http://www.joshualandis.com/blog/assad-author-isis-iran-blow-assef-sawkat-tall-tales-ehsani2/"><strong>Is Assad the Author of ISIS? [As Gutman says] Did Iran Blow Up Assef Shawkat?</strong></a></p> <p>Gutman's [weak, IMO] <a href="http://www.joshualandis.com/blog/roy-gutman-responds-ehsani2s-critique-articles-arguing-assad-built-isis-staged-al-qaida-bombings/">response.</a>  </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 11 Apr 2017 01:39:05 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 236419 at http://dagblog.com I'd rate the Daily Beast with http://dagblog.com/comment/236416#comment-236416 <a id="comment-236416"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/236414#comment-236414">I do not consider The Daily</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I'd rate the Daily Beast with a 6.5 out of 10. Higher than I'd rate the Huffington post or Consortium both of which I read some articles almost every day. I offered the link without comment just to add to the diversity of views on the topic.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:47:35 +0000 ocean-kat comment 236416 at http://dagblog.com Scott Adams deduced the gas http://dagblog.com/comment/236415#comment-236415 <a id="comment-236415"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/236410#comment-236410">Thanks, the 1st account i&#039;ve</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://blog.dilbert.com/post/159264981001/the-syrian-gas-attack-persuasion">Scott Adams </a>deduced the gas attack was a deep state hoax, he knew Assad would not do "suicide by Trump". <span style="font-size:13px">Adams has 555 million followers, so he must be smart. Adams learned about the psychology of dictators writing the Dilbert cartoon strip. He also was a Trump supporter. My kinda guy...</span></p> <p>Roy Gutman is just a 30 year veteran Pulitzer Prize winning journalist......I am....on the fence...the cartoon guy or the mideast correspondent.....?</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 10 Apr 2017 23:48:45 +0000 NCD comment 236415 at http://dagblog.com