dagblog - Comments for "New York Times: The truth, not so important after all"

Climate science should have

CVille Dem — Mon, 01 May 2017 19:28:10 +0000

Climate science should have been left to experts in atmospheric science. Like other science issues like soil biochemistry and the disposal of toxic chemical waste.

The same is true for Gynecology, Infectious Diseasees, Pediatrics (discussing guns with little children; vaccines, etc); and Health Care in General. Many more areas of expertise have been co-oped by political lackeys, religious nuts, and grifters,

Sad.

From what the Pulitzer

NCD — Sat, 29 Apr 2017 21:19:31 +0000

In reply to New York Times: The truth, not so important after all

From what the Pulitzer committee commended as a guy with unique 'contrarian twist', Bret's twist on climate change Vox interview:

A guy I know just had a baby and he’s a big global warming, climate change activist. If he thinks in 20 years we’ll be heading toward unsustainable climates and there will be tens of millions of people being displaced, presumably including himself, at the most apocalyptic level, then presumably he wouldn’t be having children.

Absurd. "Presumably including himself" because right wing grifters and their crackpot mob cannot believe anybody acts for anything but self interest.

Climate science should have been left to experts in atmospheric science. Like other science issues like soil biochemistry and the disposal of toxic chemical waste.

It was a huge crime for the GOP, Koch brothers, $$ etc to turn it into another political football.

You got me curious enough to

Obey — Sat, 29 Apr 2017 18:42:01 +0000

In reply to Because they want a token

You got me curious enough to check out what pieces he got his Pulitzer for. Some are very interesting.

http://www.pulitzer.org/winners/bret-stephens

I haven't seen any prize-worthy climate change skepticism in there yet. ;0)

Because they want a token

Michael Wolraich — Sat, 29 Apr 2017 18:13:36 +0000

In reply to New York Times: The truth, not so important after all

Because they want a token right-winger, and he won a Pulitzer.

Here's the link to the actual column: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/28/opinion/climate-of-complete-certainty...