dagblog - Comments for "Hillary adds DNC to list of those she blames for her loss" http://dagblog.com/link/hillary-blames-dnc-list-those-responsible-trump-22668 Comments for "Hillary adds DNC to list of those she blames for her loss" en It appears we have quite http://dagblog.com/comment/238788#comment-238788 <a id="comment-238788"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/238783#comment-238783">Corporatists means those who</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It appears we have quite different definitions of Neo-Liberals and Neo-Conservatives. Talking apples and oranges. That's like a Pat Buchanan old timey conservative.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 Jun 2017 14:32:22 +0000 artappraiser comment 238788 at http://dagblog.com Thanks for answering. Wanted http://dagblog.com/comment/238789#comment-238789 <a id="comment-238789"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/238762#comment-238762">No to ¨it would be great to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks for answering, Flav. Wanted to know only because you clearly wanted to share your opinion, but it wasn't clear what the opinion was. <img alt="wink" height="23" src="http://cdn.ckeditor.com/4.5.6/full-all/plugins/smiley/images/wink_smile.png" title="wink" width="23" /></p> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 Jun 2017 14:31:49 +0000 artappraiser comment 238789 at http://dagblog.com Corporatists means those who http://dagblog.com/comment/238783#comment-238783 <a id="comment-238783"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/238775#comment-238775">For example if ¨corporatists </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Corporatists means those who champion pro-corporate, anti-labor, anti-consumer, anti-competition, anti-environment policies.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 Jun 2017 13:47:23 +0000 HSG comment 238783 at http://dagblog.com - "Third-way Centrism is dead http://dagblog.com/comment/238779#comment-238779 <a id="comment-238779"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/238778#comment-238778">Actually, it&#039;s showing that</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>- "Third-way Centrism is dead" </p> <p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npjOSLCR2hE">- "No no its resting. Beautiful plumage"</a> </p> <p>As for the likely next Tory leader, who wouldn't go to a Boris event? Once May starts crash-tackling 8 year olds and getting stuck on a zipline with fun-size flags, we can talk. </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 Jun 2017 08:05:48 +0000 Obey comment 238779 at http://dagblog.com Actually, it's showing that http://dagblog.com/comment/238778#comment-238778 <a id="comment-238778"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/238777#comment-238777">Counterpoint: </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Actually, it's showing that less bad but kinda blurred policy can triumph over a leader that comes across as largely clueless, arrogant, heartless, and contradicts herself in big ways. Oh, and a woman. Boris Johnson for example can spout out about his "Titanic Success" and still draw a crowd and keep his government seat, and somehow the Tories can be wrong and deceptive at every turn but still keep their majority. Personally, I'd keep the fundraising going.</p> <p>PS - photo of conservative keeping up the reservation - "what me worry? things will work out"</p> <p><img alt="" height="533" src="http://images.glaciermedia.ca/polopoly_fs/1.20395818.1496541514!/fileImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/landscape_804/cpt109409578-jpg.jpg" width="400" /></p> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 Jun 2017 06:34:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 238778 at http://dagblog.com Counterpoint:  http://dagblog.com/comment/238777#comment-238777 <a id="comment-238777"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/238775#comment-238775">For example if ¨corporatists </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Counterpoint: </p> <p>- <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jun/01/conservatives-donors-give-10-times-as-much-as-labours-in-one-week">The Tories have an at least 2 to 1 funding advantage in the UK election</a></p> <p>- <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/labour-ahead-of-conservatives-tories-ipsos-mori-poll-unadjusted-a7770651.html">Labour started 24% down in the pools and has managed to almost close the gap, despite also a univocally hostile press</a>. </p> <p>It's almost as if good policy (rather than less bad policy) can make up for the resulting funding disadvantage. </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 Jun 2017 05:06:00 +0000 Obey comment 238777 at http://dagblog.com For example if ¨corporatists http://dagblog.com/comment/238775#comment-238775 <a id="comment-238775"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/238762#comment-238762">No to ¨it would be great to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>For example if ¨corporatists ¨ includes George Soros , it would not be ¨great¨ if he exits. Given ¨Citizens United¨.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 05 Jun 2017 01:59:23 +0000 Flavius comment 238775 at http://dagblog.com No to ¨it would be great to http://dagblog.com/comment/238762#comment-238762 <a id="comment-238762"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/238743#comment-238743">no to what, Flav? like I said</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>To ¨it would be great to see the corporatists exit en masse¨.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 04 Jun 2017 19:08:15 +0000 Flavius comment 238762 at http://dagblog.com Did you miss Rove backing http://dagblog.com/comment/238760#comment-238760 <a id="comment-238760"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/238720#comment-238720">Thx</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Did you miss <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/bernie-sanderss-conservative-fanboys">Rove backing Bernie</a>? and <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bernie-sanders-fake-news-russia_us_58c34d97e4b0ed71826cdb36">Russia fake news spammers too</a>? is it any wonder why he's America's "most popular politician™"? When is "reaching across the aisle" too much? Unlike Bush, perhaps 'carried to 3rd base and thought he hit a triple'.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 04 Jun 2017 16:54:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 238760 at http://dagblog.com no to what, Flav? like I said http://dagblog.com/comment/238743#comment-238743 <a id="comment-238743"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/238740#comment-238740">No.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>no to what, Flav? like I said yesterday:you so funny.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 04 Jun 2017 03:24:07 +0000 artappraiser comment 238743 at http://dagblog.com