dagblog - Comments for "Nikky Hayley::The U.N. Human Rights Council whitewashes brutality&quot;" http://dagblog.com/link/nikky-hayleythe-un-human-rights-council-whitewashes-brutality-22670 Comments for "Nikky Hayley::The U.N. Human Rights Council whitewashes brutality"" en Perhaps once in a while http://dagblog.com/comment/238678#comment-238678 <a id="comment-238678"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/238665#comment-238665">WaPo op-ed by Carl Bildt, a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Perhaps once in a while theyshould step back and think about that name: UNITED Nations. Stronger together.Not "Group Bitch Fest".</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 03 Jun 2017 06:36:34 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 238678 at http://dagblog.com WaPo op-ed by Carl Bildt, a http://dagblog.com/comment/238665#comment-238665 <a id="comment-238665"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/nikky-hayleythe-un-human-rights-council-whitewashes-brutality-22670">Nikky Hayley::The U.N. Human Rights Council whitewashes brutality&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>WaPo op-ed by Carl Bildt, a former prime minister of Sweden and a contributing columnist, June 2</p> <p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/global-opinions/wp/2017/06/02/the-scariest-part-of-trumps-speech-wasnt-about-the-paris-accord/?tid=pm_opinions_pop&amp;utm_term=.a09ca5954d06">The scariest part of Trump’s Paris accord speech wasn’t about climate</a></p> <blockquote> <p>[....] on a deeper level, the speech marked that Trump’s proclaimed policy of “America First,” aggressively launched in his inaugural address, should in effect be replaced by a policy of “America Alone.” It was the ceremonial launch of the true Trump doctrine.</p> <p>The speech didn’t really deal with the issue of global climate change and how to cope with it. The speech didn’t address the pros and cons of the different parts of the Paris agreement. In both cases, these certainly deserve discussion.</p> <p>Implicitly, the central premise of Trump’s speech was that a group of foreign countries is engaged in some sort of conspiracy to prevent the United States from developing according to its abilities and will — and that the United States will now do whatever it wants, without taking the interests of the rest of the world into account [.....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Fri, 02 Jun 2017 23:59:30 +0000 artappraiser comment 238665 at http://dagblog.com