dagblog - Comments for "Bad Boys/Bad Boys (watcha gonna do...)" http://dagblog.com/politics/bad-boysbad-boys-watcha-gonna-do-22680 Comments for "Bad Boys/Bad Boys (watcha gonna do...)" en Moter City Dumbfuck weighs in http://dagblog.com/comment/238758#comment-238758 <a id="comment-238758"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/bad-boysbad-boys-watcha-gonna-do-22680">Bad Boys/Bad Boys (watcha gonna do...)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5932dcb4e4b0c242ca248bf5">Moter City Dumbfuck weighs in</a>. Yeah, his threats to kill the president were "metaphor", meaning"meta for his lameass followers". Sorry, Ted - you're a dinosaur, as spunky as a go-kart, as dated as the Dodge Omni and as hateful &amp;laughable as the Edsel.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 04 Jun 2017 15:04:20 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 238758 at http://dagblog.com Ever since Reagan we've been http://dagblog.com/comment/238715#comment-238715 <a id="comment-238715"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/238711#comment-238711">P.S. As to channeling</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ever since Reagan we've been focused on that righteous fire-and-brimstone, Old Testament-and-Revelations-skip-the-stuff-between "Left Behind" vision of humanity and religion. But anyway, this was a bit of humor <em>from a comedian</em>, not the "crooked media", right up Trump's alley - don't see how he can object. Aside from inherent inconsistency and the reference to Shakespeare whose tragedies like the Greeks' are probably coming too close to home (House that Atreus Built?). Again, only locker room talk. How come boys can be boys, but girls can't be girls?</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed" height="240px" width="600px"><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="240px" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/2BErfDZ5abg" width="600px"></iframe></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 03 Jun 2017 19:27:25 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 238715 at http://dagblog.com P.S. As to channeling http://dagblog.com/comment/238711#comment-238711 <a id="comment-238711"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/238709#comment-238709">1. First Amendment isn&#039;t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>P.S. As to channeling iconography like<em> Judith &amp; Holifernes </em>or <em>Samson and Delilah.</em> That is Jewish Old Testament fire and brimstone stuff of a vengeful yahweh, not of the world of "turn the other cheek" of the Christian Gospels. If you want to go there, be aware that you are also aligning yourself with: Islamic militants, Wahabbi  justice, radical 1980's feminists, and Lorena Bobbitt, for that matter. Which should work fine if your intent is to take things in the direction of Israel vs. Palestine threads on the internet.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 03 Jun 2017 18:06:50 +0000 artappraiser comment 238711 at http://dagblog.com 1. First Amendment isn't http://dagblog.com/comment/238709#comment-238709 <a id="comment-238709"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/bad-boysbad-boys-watcha-gonna-do-22680">Bad Boys/Bad Boys (watcha gonna do...)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>1. First Amendment isn't there to protect hate speech from criticism, but rather, encourages criticism of it.</p> <p>2. So you say you wanna be avant garde? Do you realize that before it became popular with the elite monied class to support the controversial, that meant you would be unpopular and suffer in poverty and ignominy?</p> <p>3. The question of the future: What is "popular taste" these days? As in: what would get you: a) high ratings, or b) taxpayer supported art, or c) crowd source funded art?</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 03 Jun 2017 17:54:16 +0000 artappraiser comment 238709 at http://dagblog.com Trump and his cohort are http://dagblog.com/comment/238698#comment-238698 <a id="comment-238698"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/bad-boysbad-boys-watcha-gonna-do-22680">Bad Boys/Bad Boys (watcha gonna do...)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Trump and his cohort are snowflakes. Kathy Griffin is a friggin' comedian. The Montana Repubicanmguy actually struck a reporter. The Texas Governor joked about shooting reporters, but Griffin is the bad guy? Ted Nugent was invited to the Trump White House!</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 03 Jun 2017 15:01:21 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 238698 at http://dagblog.com