dagblog - Comments for "Winter of Progressive Discontent" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/winter-progressive-discontent-22716 Comments for "Winter of Progressive Discontent" en Thanks for fleshing this out. http://dagblog.com/comment/239126#comment-239126 <a id="comment-239126"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/239119#comment-239119">You wrote:</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks for fleshing this out.  I cited to the news stories that formed the bases for the opinions I set forth.  The term "fringe" came from the Bozeman Daily Chronicle.  I claimed that the debts probably didn't sink Quist because the Helena newspaper indicated that for many Montanans - especially ranchers - debts are a fact of life.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 10 Jun 2017 01:37:58 +0000 HSG comment 239126 at http://dagblog.com Quist got 44%, much larger http://dagblog.com/comment/239120#comment-239120 <a id="comment-239120"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/239119#comment-239119">You wrote:</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>Quist got 44%, much larger than the percent Clinton got in the general election. </em></p> <p>Too often we make too much of these comparisons. When Gianforte ran for governor in 2016 he lost with 46% of the vote. Gianforte's loss against the last democrat was better than Quist's loss against Gianforte. How ever much Quist may have improved on Hillary's loss to Trump Gianforte improved much more over his loss to Bullock. My hopes are not much improved when dems lose less badly than Hillary in these red states.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 09 Jun 2017 21:37:51 +0000 ocean-kat comment 239120 at http://dagblog.com You wrote: http://dagblog.com/comment/239119#comment-239119 <a id="comment-239119"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/winter-progressive-discontent-22716">Winter of Progressive Discontent</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><font><font>You wrote:</font></font></p> <blockquote> <p>Yet the Democrat lost and by an uncomfortably large margin. Some possible explanations: Folksinger Quist was a <u><a href="http://www.bozemandailychronicle.com/opinions/editorials/serious-flaws-afflict-gianforte-quist-campaigns/article_74f754e2-0291-5770-8cba-d54a580bc373.html">fringe</a></u> candidate. Montana knew Gianforte better. The Democratic National Committee got involved too late. Most seriously, the Montana news media raised legitimate questions about the propriety of Quist’s finances based in part on unpaid state tax liens filed against his property and claims by contractors for unpaid wages.</p> </blockquote> <p>This is really a problem with the candidate and yet Rob performed better than HRC did last fall, but all of those things you wrote are correct and hurt Rob, but Rob did a great deal of work at the local levels to get the nomination, he went to every single country and talked to all the Dem's he could and he won the nomination by doing that, so he did some really hard work, you can't stop a candidate like that, because he won the nomination, fair and square, and had Gianforte assaulted the reporter earlier, he would have lost.  But Montanan's do not like people who are financially irresponsible, period, they figure if you can't manage your own finances you sure as shit cannot fix the fed's finances. </p> <p>Okay let's talk about the Montana election, Rob did shrink the margin from Trumps win last fall, that is good, but Rob is a country singer, he does have bad finances and everything you mentioned, but he did cover the state and win the Democratic nomination because everyone in Montana knows Rob, and he is especially well known in the eastern part of the state which is very conservative. But I wouldn't call him a fringe candidate, however, I would call him a troubling candidate, because of all the issues you mentioned. </p> <p>If you saw the map election night you should have noticed the few areas in Montana that are blue, Silver Bow County, Deer Lodge County, Missoula County, Roosevelt County, Glacier Country, Hill County, Blaine County, Gallatin County, and Park County and Big Horn County.  That is 10 counties out of 56 counties, but Quist got 44%, much larger than the percent Clinton got in the general election. Rob has limited knowledge of issues and no real in-depth knowledge of any subject that one might need to know if you were going to be in government.  Clinton only won 6 of those counties, and Rob turned a couple of counties light pink. He just was barely a good candidate, because of all those issues you mentioned above. Gianforte will not win in 2018 if Democrats can get a great candidate, but because of Quist, they made gains. It weird that you think those personal issues didn't sink him because they didn't help him at all, in fact, according to Montanan's they did sink him. </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 09 Jun 2017 21:19:00 +0000 tmccarthy0 comment 239119 at http://dagblog.com When I get home to Seattle I http://dagblog.com/comment/238922#comment-238922 <a id="comment-238922"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/winter-progressive-discontent-22716">Winter of Progressive Discontent</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>When I get home to Seattle I'm going to tell the Montana at large story. I was there and my relatives are Montana voters. You're story is not quite right. Expect my response Friday. </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 Jun 2017 23:17:41 +0000 tmccarthy0 comment 238922 at http://dagblog.com No candidate of either party http://dagblog.com/comment/238916#comment-238916 <a id="comment-238916"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/238908#comment-238908">Fair enough.  Bernie is far</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>No candidate of either party is ever ideal. We need to be able to win with ¨good enough ¨  candidates like Bernie and Hillary. Given the Republican´s inherent financial advantage, that always required that we also have good enough fund raising competence. But with  ¨Citizens United ¨ the Court  put such a heavy finger on the scale that it´s wishful thinking to imagine  we can combat it with Bernie-type crowd funding.</p> <p> It' ll take $s.</p> <p>You pick cherries where the cherries  is. ¨Hollywood ¨for sure. But also the financial industry  we´re hoping  to tell get lost. The other thing that´ll be lost will be  the  election (s).  </p> <p>   </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 Jun 2017 21:44:44 +0000 Flavius comment 238916 at http://dagblog.com Fair enough.  Bernie is far http://dagblog.com/comment/238908#comment-238908 <a id="comment-238908"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/238906#comment-238906">Hal, I think it is more about</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Fair enough.  Bernie is far from ideal.  He did a poor job when he started his campaign listening to voters who were skeptical of him and his message.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 Jun 2017 18:35:07 +0000 HSG comment 238908 at http://dagblog.com Hal, I think it is more about http://dagblog.com/comment/238906#comment-238906 <a id="comment-238906"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/238903#comment-238903">Which of Sanders&#039; policy</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hal, I think it is more about listening specifically to what people in town halls are saying. "Millionaires and Billionaires is not getting actual votes.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 Jun 2017 17:54:57 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 238906 at http://dagblog.com Which of Sanders' policy http://dagblog.com/comment/238903#comment-238903 <a id="comment-238903"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/238902#comment-238902">One problem with the Sanders</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Which of Sanders' policy prescriptions do you personally oppose?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 Jun 2017 17:46:43 +0000 HSG comment 238903 at http://dagblog.com One problem with the Sanders http://dagblog.com/comment/238902#comment-238902 <a id="comment-238902"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/winter-progressive-discontent-22716">Winter of Progressive Discontent</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>One problem with the Sanders approach is that you go in assuming that you know what is best for the voters and what they want. You feel no need to ask voters what they want. You ignore certain populations concerns. Turnout for rallies is high. Favorability is high. You still lose elections.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 Jun 2017 17:31:38 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 238902 at http://dagblog.com Why has Sanders behavior http://dagblog.com/comment/238895#comment-238895 <a id="comment-238895"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/238893#comment-238893">Thanks OGD. That&#039;s the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Why has Sanders behavior regarding Ossoff been so bizarre.</p> <p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/04/20/bernie-sanderss-strange-behavior/">https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/04/20/bernie-sanders...</a></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 06 Jun 2017 15:49:08 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 238895 at http://dagblog.com