dagblog - Comments for "Supreme Court sides with Serb who lied during naturalization process" http://dagblog.com/link/supreme-court-sides-serb-who-lied-during-naturalization-process-22858 Comments for "Supreme Court sides with Serb who lied during naturalization process" en They sent the case back to http://dagblog.com/comment/239828#comment-239828 <a id="comment-239828"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/supreme-court-sides-serb-who-lied-during-naturalization-process-22858">Supreme Court sides with Serb who lied during naturalization process</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>They sent the case back to the lower court. If the lie affected the approval for admission as a refugee, they can still be deported. </p> </div></div></div> Fri, 23 Jun 2017 03:23:20 +0000 NCD comment 239828 at http://dagblog.com Thanks. I missed/forgot that http://dagblog.com/comment/239822#comment-239822 <a id="comment-239822"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/239821#comment-239821">Missed in the Clinton</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks. I missed/forgot that tidbit in the Bill Clinton saga.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 22 Jun 2017 21:50:18 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 239822 at http://dagblog.com Missed in the Clinton http://dagblog.com/comment/239821#comment-239821 <a id="comment-239821"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/supreme-court-sides-serb-who-lied-during-naturalization-process-22858">Supreme Court sides with Serb who lied during naturalization process</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Missed in the Clinton impeachment is that perjury requires the lie be germane to the investigation - his being about consensual relations between 2 adults made it irrelevant to Ken Starr's case. Glad they affirmed again here</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 22 Jun 2017 21:37:28 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 239821 at http://dagblog.com