dagblog - Comments for "Trump&#039;s Recess Scheme" http://dagblog.com/trumps-recess-scheme-23093 Comments for "Trump's Recess Scheme" en A professional hacker just http://dagblog.com/comment/241236#comment-241236 <a id="comment-241236"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/240831#comment-240831">It appears that won&#039;t happen </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>A professional hacker just provided me full access to my children's phone calls, text messages and their social media accounts which means i can now monitor their daily activities and also be able to know when they are being misled by anyone. I am happy about this because my kids mean the world to me and ever since the death of their mother, i promised  to always be there for them not only as a father but also as a mother so as to secure a bright future for them...You can contact the brain behind the hack at spystealth.org at gmail dot com for any problems you have that relates to hacking.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 04 Aug 2017 23:13:08 +0000 ray marcum comment 241236 at http://dagblog.com Maddow and Wolraich scooped http://dagblog.com/comment/240888#comment-240888 <a id="comment-240888"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/trumps-recess-scheme-23093">Trump&#039;s Recess Scheme</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Maddow and Wolraich scooped WaPo (or planted the idea in Trump's noggin? or at the very least planted it with White House leakers?<img alt="cheeky" height="23" src="http://cdn.ckeditor.com/4.5.6/full-all/plugins/smiley/images/tongue_smile.png" title="cheeky" width="23" />) Here's their home page headline right now:</p> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-talks-privately-about-the-idea-of-a-recess-appointment-to-replace-sessions/2017/07/26/2a347d32-723c-11e7-9eac-d56bd5568db8_story.html">Trump ponders a recess appointment to replace Attorney General Sessions</a></div> <div><em>Two people familiar with the issue described President Trump as musing about the idea rather than outlining a plan of action, and several others said the president’s fury peaked over the weekend and that he and Sessions now seem to be heading toward an uneasy detente.</em></div> </div> </div> </div> </div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 27 Jul 2017 05:52:09 +0000 artappraiser comment 240888 at http://dagblog.com and then there's Borowitz:  http://dagblog.com/comment/240868#comment-240868 <a id="comment-240868"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/240863#comment-240863">WaPo&#039;s home page headline</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>and then there's Borowitz:  <a class="Link__link___3dWao " href="http://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/jeff-sessions-urges-melania-to-work-harder-on-campaign-to-stop-cyberbullying">Jeff Sessions Urges Melania to Work Harder on Campaign to Stop Cyberbullying</a></p> <div> <div> <div><em>“From my perspective, cyberbullying is very much a growing problem,” the Attorney General said.</em></div> </div> </div> </div></div></div> Thu, 27 Jul 2017 01:00:20 +0000 artappraiser comment 240868 at http://dagblog.com WaPo's home page headline http://dagblog.com/comment/240863#comment-240863 <a id="comment-240863"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/trumps-recess-scheme-23093">Trump&#039;s Recess Scheme</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>WaPo's home page headline story right now:</p> <p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/senate-republicans-have-tolerated-trumps-controversies-his-treatment-of-sessions-is-different/2017/07/26/f3b00a6a-722c-11e7-8f39-eeb7d3a2d304_story.html">GOP senators stand up for Attorney General Sessions as Trump bashes him</a></p> <div> <div> <div> <div><em>Unlike any other controversial move that President Trump has pondered during his first six months in the Oval Office, Senate Republicans are sending preemptive signals that firing the attorney general or pressuring him into resigning would be a terrible move.</em></div> <ul><li>By <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/paul-kane/">Paul Kane</a></li> <li>2 hours ago</li> </ul></div> </div> </div> <div> <div> <div> <div><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-launches-new-attacks-on-sessions/2017/07/26/e2e10a8e-720b-11e7-8839-ec48ec4cae25_story.html">Trump launches new attacks on Sessions</a></div> </div> </div> </div> </div></div></div> Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:56:02 +0000 artappraiser comment 240863 at http://dagblog.com Hewitt has been trying to http://dagblog.com/comment/240843#comment-240843 <a id="comment-240843"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/240835#comment-240835">From Rubin&#039;s piece this</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hewitt has been trying to thread the needle between defending Trump while criticizing him just enough to not be a Hannity like sycophant. I think that's why he just weeks ago he got a show on MSNBC. I wonder how he is viewed by the Trump base now that he has a show on the most liberal MSN network.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:54:39 +0000 ocean-kat comment 240843 at http://dagblog.com Resignation is what Trump http://dagblog.com/comment/240842#comment-240842 <a id="comment-240842"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/240840#comment-240840">Thanks. Also from Politico:</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Resignation is what Trump wants and is so clearly telegraphing, but he'll still be left with the need for Senate confirmation - and after his NYT tantrum about Sessions' recusal it won't be an easy nomination for him.  </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 25 Jul 2017 17:57:49 +0000 barefooted comment 240842 at http://dagblog.com Thanks. Also from Politico: http://dagblog.com/comment/240840#comment-240840 <a id="comment-240840"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/240835#comment-240835">From Rubin&#039;s piece this</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks. Also from <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2017/07/25/trump-jeff-sessions-will-he-resign-240930">Politico</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Some White House advisers are warning the president against dismissing the attorney general. Chief strategist Steve Bannon, for example, has emphasized that firing Sessions is a risky move that would cast the White House in a negative light and potentially unleash a political disaster, according to a senior White House aide.</p> </blockquote> <p>Trump probably thinks he will avoid political blowback (and possible obstruction charges) if Sessions resigns rather than being fired.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 25 Jul 2017 17:10:20 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 240840 at http://dagblog.com Well, timid in confronting http://dagblog.com/comment/240839#comment-240839 <a id="comment-240839"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/240832#comment-240832">Jaw dropped at &quot;this timid</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well, timid in confronting Trump. But point well taken.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 25 Jul 2017 17:05:55 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 240839 at http://dagblog.com Thanks, I wasn't aware that http://dagblog.com/comment/240838#comment-240838 <a id="comment-240838"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/240831#comment-240831">It appears that won&#039;t happen </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks, I wasn't aware that Dems could do that. Great news.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 25 Jul 2017 17:04:59 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 240838 at http://dagblog.com From Rubin's piece this http://dagblog.com/comment/240835#comment-240835 <a id="comment-240835"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/trumps-recess-scheme-23093">Trump&#039;s Recess Scheme</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>From <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2017/07/25/how-sessions-regains-his-honor/?hpid=hp_no-name_opinion-card-d%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&amp;utm_term=.30302a7df8f8">Rubin's piece this morning at WaPo</a>: This morning Trump Tweets fit your analysis, as he is continuing trying to rile up the base about Hillary "crimes" not being prosecuted (as he did in his remarks to the Boy Scout Jamboree yesterday!)  In his twisted logic, the base would then give GOP Senators backing to support a different attorney general. But it's complicated. Rubin points out in that article that Scaramucci told Hugh Hewitt that he recommended not firing Sessions, that is also being reported this morning by Hewitt. So the part of the Trump base listening to Hewitt would not get fired up, if you know what I mean. Amazing that Scaramucci already has messaging conflicts with the Tweeter in Chief...so it goes...</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 25 Jul 2017 16:38:16 +0000 artappraiser comment 240835 at http://dagblog.com