dagblog - Comments for "Mooch: &quot;I’m not trying to suck my own cock&quot;" http://dagblog.com/link/mooch-i-m-not-trying-suck-my-own-cock-23110 Comments for "Mooch: "I’m not trying to suck my own cock"" en To be clear, "presumptious" http://dagblog.com/comment/241017#comment-241017 <a id="comment-241017"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/241016#comment-241016">Comes to mind that maybe it</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>To be clear, "presumptious" is a guy's joke, usually to gross out other guys who wouldn't go that far. And I tell it better than Clay, perhaps because I'm not as stoopid, or maybe cause they don't think I'd be screwing my sister.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 30 Jul 2017 16:53:39 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 241017 at http://dagblog.com Comes to mind that maybe it http://dagblog.com/comment/241016#comment-241016 <a id="comment-241016"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/241015#comment-241015">I think this one is way</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Comes to mind that maybe it is a male/female difference this way: women who have spent time in the bar pickup scene have all had had to deal with guys like the Clay character, really that disgusting.  that try to pick you up with gross locker room and macho crap, as if they think you would find it attractive. And there might be a Anita Hill type effect going on, where guys go: really, guys actually do that to you?. There are a lot more of them out there doing that than less clueless men suspect. Men talk like Scaramucci with other men but they don't use that on women. But there are also a lot of clueless guys out there who do. Women see a lot of Andrew Dice Clay's in their life, so it's not as shocking, just: <em>oh that, yuck.</em></p> <p>Edit to add: and yes, the Trump "pussy" tape is exactly that. It is not amusing, it signals that this guy is: a real ass, doesn't get it. Hence the huge reaction with the women's protests after inauguration, even non-feminist. That is what signaled that he is that kind of guy more than anything else. The whole beauty pageant thing was another clue but not as strong. The billionaire taking of trophy wives is not the same thing, not all women react so viscerally to that, it is not signifying that: this guy is a clueless disgusting oaf that doesn't get it.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 30 Jul 2017 16:53:29 +0000 artappraiser comment 241016 at http://dagblog.com I think this one is way http://dagblog.com/comment/241015#comment-241015 <a id="comment-241015"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/241010#comment-241010">Yes, that&#039;s the one - perhaps</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think this one is way funnier than that one and also more over the line, maybe it's funnier because of that. Makes clearer why I don't find Clay funny, his stuff is just standard guido type talk. I react like this: I don't get why people are laughing, haven't they met any stupid oafs that talk like this all the time?</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 30 Jul 2017 16:29:18 +0000 artappraiser comment 241015 at http://dagblog.com Yes, that's the one - perhaps http://dagblog.com/comment/241010#comment-241010 <a id="comment-241010"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/241004#comment-241004">I don&#039;t know it, went</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yes, that's the one - perhaps the only one I heard of his, perhaps the only one I liked. YMMV. Worried now that I should be writing in caps all the time, or perhaps cap-bold-italics...</p> <p>"A pedophile and a young boy are walking into a dark forest. The boy says to the pedophile, 'I'm scared'. The pedophile responds, 'you think you're scared - I have to walk out of here alone.'"</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 30 Jul 2017 04:52:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 241010 at http://dagblog.com Side note, I found the joke I http://dagblog.com/comment/241007#comment-241007 <a id="comment-241007"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/241004#comment-241004">I don&#039;t know it, went</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Side note, I found the joke I mention on Reddit.com/jokes. They've got a great line for forums above the the sign in box, with the old Microsoft Clippie character asking:<em> It looks like you're writing unsubstantiated nonsense. Would you like to turn on all caps?</em></p> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Jul 2017 23:07:11 +0000 artappraiser comment 241007 at http://dagblog.com I don't know it, went http://dagblog.com/comment/241004#comment-241004 <a id="comment-241004"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/240997#comment-240997">Do you know Clay&#039;s </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I don't know it, went googling, not sure. The one with the underage punchline?</p> <p>(I don't know a lot of his jokes because I haven't listened much because mostly he doesn't make me laugh, not because it's dirty.)</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Jul 2017 22:51:16 +0000 artappraiser comment 241004 at http://dagblog.com Do you know Clay's http://dagblog.com/comment/240997#comment-240997 <a id="comment-240997"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/240994#comment-240994">i definitely see a very</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Do you know Clay's "presumptious" joke? Used to be one of my standards until I realized people had trouble talking to me afterwards. Okay, that didn't stop me either...</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Jul 2017 18:16:40 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 240997 at http://dagblog.com i definitely see a very http://dagblog.com/comment/240994#comment-240994 <a id="comment-240994"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/240991#comment-240991">Where the scatological merges</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I definitely see a very strong element of white DooWop culture in Scaramucci's rant. I was reminded of this by Obey bringing in the word <em>pomposity, </em>which made me think of Steve Miller's famous created phrase <em>pompatous of love, </em>the whole song "The Joker" riffs off DooWop culture some. New Joisy does have this deep in it, too, and I think PP's reference to Chris Christie also very apt.  This is where Bruce Springsteen and Andrew Dice Clay cross paths: <em>up yours, motherfucker!</em></p> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Jul 2017 17:34:20 +0000 artappraiser comment 240994 at http://dagblog.com You actually got this right, http://dagblog.com/comment/240992#comment-240992 <a id="comment-240992"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/240987#comment-240987">Not even pompous - decidedly</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You actually got this right, very sophisticated and subtle understanding of greater NYC subcultures. He is actually not Tom Wolfe's Sherman McCoy of Park Avenue, Manhattan. That is WASP world, white shoe, one step above. What people don't get about "Wall Street" is many more Wall Streeters are slick tough Long Island gangsta types than the McCoy bond salesmen. Middle Long Island is not white shoe, even the Hamptons aren't. Long Island is all varying levels of nouveau riche, classier the farther east it goes, but still nouveau riche. Old money WASP's of Upper East Side Manhattan ("Park Avenue") mostly do not have second homes on Long Island, unless they are very old inherited estates, is considered tacky. Conversely, a Scaramucci type would <em>never</em> get lost in the Bronx driving from JFK airport to Manhattan, he would know all the exits and which ones to avoid.</p> <p>Edit to add: should clarify the tacky thing.The eastern half of Long Island is not tacky looking at all, what is called "the Hamptons" is extremely beautiful territory, I myself think of it as heavenly. The ocean light beautiful suffuses everything, everything is manicured to perfection to maintain a small town picture book feel, not overdone. Somewhere in the middle of the island you cross over from McMansion world to heaven and you know it. I haven't read where the Scaramucci house is, but if that is where it is, I totally get a woman so lucky as to have a place there not wanting to give up life there for D.C. With major money, it can what Martha Stewart calls a "Fantin Latour moment" continuously. And also sheltered from all the crap that it takes to make that kind of money.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Jul 2017 16:25:18 +0000 artappraiser comment 240992 at http://dagblog.com Where the scatological merges http://dagblog.com/comment/240991#comment-240991 <a id="comment-240991"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/240987#comment-240987">Not even pompous - decidedly</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Where the scatological merges seamlessly with sophomoric entitlement?<br /> Roll the Dice, baby:</p> <p> </p> <div class="media_embed" height="315px" width="560px"><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315px" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/aTKZRire8Wg" width="560px"></iframe></div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 29 Jul 2017 16:02:22 +0000 moat comment 240991 at http://dagblog.com