dagblog - Comments for "Questions emerge over what Wisconsin must give for Foxconn Plant" http://dagblog.com/link/questions-emerge-over-what-wisconsin-must-give-foxconn-plant-23238 Comments for "Questions emerge over what Wisconsin must give for Foxconn Plant" en it's far from any kind of http://dagblog.com/comment/241437#comment-241437 <a id="comment-241437"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/questions-emerge-over-what-wisconsin-must-give-foxconn-plant-23238">Questions emerge over what Wisconsin must give for Foxconn Plant</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>it's far from any kind of done deal, as the NYT piece says</p> <blockquote> <p>The latest blow to the project came this week from the state Legislative Fiscal Bureau, a nonpartisan agency that analyzes legislation for lawmakers, which found that Wisconsin taxpayers would not recoup their investment in Foxconn until at least 2043 — a conclusion that alarmed both Democrats and fiscal conservatives. </p> </blockquote> <p>that report is <a href="http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/misc/lfb/bill_summaries/2017_19/0001_ss_ab_1_foxconn_fiserv_legislation_8_8_17.pdf">here</a></p> <p>and <a href="http://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/2017/08/11/changes-foxconn-bill-being-released-friday-gop-lawmakers-say/559082001/">the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports today that </a></p> <blockquote> <p>- Assembly Republicans are poised to release changes Friday to a bill providing environmental exemptions and up to $2.85 billion in cash payments to lure a flat screen display plant to southeastern Wisconsin.</p> <p>Kit Beyer, an aide to Speaker Robin Vos (R-Rochester), said the amendments to the bill will be released ahead of committee and floor votes next week in that house. [....]</p> </blockquote> <p>really still at pie in the sky phase.</p> <p>Trump's wall comes to mind.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 11 Aug 2017 18:18:46 +0000 artappraiser comment 241437 at http://dagblog.com