dagblog - Comments for "Joe Biden’s Platform for 2020: Anti-Populism" http://dagblog.com/link/joe-biden-s-platform-2020-anti-populism-23549 Comments for "Joe Biden’s Platform for 2020: Anti-Populism" en The word populism needs to be http://dagblog.com/comment/243182#comment-243182 <a id="comment-243182"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/joe-biden-s-platform-2020-anti-populism-23549">Joe Biden’s Platform for 2020: Anti-Populism</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The word populism needs to be sent to the shop for repairs. If the term is going to be used interchangeably with expressions like, "some large swath of the electorate", then which politician is not a populist?</p> <p>Trump was not a populist in his campaign. He promised to retain all kinds of different privileges under assault by the "liberal agenda". That a large number of voters were attracted to that message doesn't make them a movement or even a self identified interest group (except for the obvious exceptions). They liked the Charmin advertisement so they bought Charmin.</p> <p>Clinton was not a populist in her campaign because she advanced the idea that the Democratic Party was a coalition of different people with common goals. She was arguing that the house did not have to be burnt down to serve the interest of the people, it just had to figure out what the best policies were.</p> <p>I think it is fair to describe Sanders as a populist. He directly appealed to class differences as the primary condition requiring change. On the other hand, much of the talk about restraining trade deals and commercial taxation are traditional Democratic tactics to turn entrepreneurs into engines of socially just production.<br /><br /> Joe Biden? Sorry, I dropped my map.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 24 Sep 2017 22:37:09 +0000 moat comment 243182 at http://dagblog.com I hear he's got his Ouija http://dagblog.com/comment/243146#comment-243146 <a id="comment-243146"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/243140#comment-243140">Whether it is accurate to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I hear he's got his Ouija board out figuring out what Beau would do. Very touching.</p> <p>[in a peculiar twist, Beau's widow has hooked up with his brother - something I thought only Hindus do when not self-immolating. Anyway, not my focus or concern, just a quirk noted while Googling.]</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 24 Sep 2017 15:12:30 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 243146 at http://dagblog.com Whether it is accurate to http://dagblog.com/comment/243140#comment-243140 <a id="comment-243140"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/joe-biden-s-platform-2020-anti-populism-23549">Joe Biden’s Platform for 2020: Anti-Populism</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Whether it is accurate to call what Biden is doing anti-populist or not, I think the author is correctly pegging the current zeitgeist. I am seeing indications of it everywhere in all the news and op-eds I read: after Trump is done, populism is going to lose its appeal for quite some time, and not just nationally, but globally. People will be looking for a grown-up "daddy" who will make it all better and tell them the right thing to do, not someone who feeds their fears and prejudices.</p> <p>Edit to add: and while Biden is not always seen as an excellent candidate "on the stump", he is a very smart and experienced pol, and I would not be surprised if he is seeing that anti-populism is where the party should go for 2020.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 24 Sep 2017 14:52:55 +0000 artappraiser comment 243140 at http://dagblog.com Obama was not a populist at http://dagblog.com/comment/243126#comment-243126 <a id="comment-243126"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/243117#comment-243117">No matter who it is Hal can</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Obama was not a populist at all, did not govern as one. He won in 2008 because he ran a more populist campaign than either Hillary or McCain, had far less baggage than Clinton, was more likeable than either, W had tanked the economy, and the country had turned against Iraq. Also he just seems Presidential. Tall, cool, handsome, smart.</p> <p>Obama won in 2012 because the economy was starting to pick up and nobody could have been less of a populist than Mitt "corporations are people my friend" Romney.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 24 Sep 2017 09:32:09 +0000 HSG comment 243126 at http://dagblog.com No matter who it is Hal can http://dagblog.com/comment/243117#comment-243117 <a id="comment-243117"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/243109#comment-243109">Hal, you are consistent.  You</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>No matter who it is Hal can find some reason they're a populist. Obama was a populist, that's why he won. Biden is a populist and would have won. Everybody except Hillary. He can't find a single thing she said that was populist. That tells you all you need to know about Hal.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 24 Sep 2017 02:55:37 +0000 ocean-kat comment 243117 at http://dagblog.com Hal, you are consistent.  You http://dagblog.com/comment/243109#comment-243109 <a id="comment-243109"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/243102#comment-243102">Criticizing Silicon Valley</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hal, you are consistent.  You make no sense, and much of what you say is simply not factual. </p> <p>And no, I don't want to accept your assignment to prove what I have just said. It is so obvious, that I assign you to disprove it.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 24 Sep 2017 01:47:54 +0000 CVille Dem comment 243109 at http://dagblog.com Criticizing Silicon Valley http://dagblog.com/comment/243102#comment-243102 <a id="comment-243102"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/joe-biden-s-platform-2020-anti-populism-23549">Joe Biden’s Platform for 2020: Anti-Populism</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Criticizing Silicon Valley execs and DC Pols for selling America's workers short is the essence of populism. Biden is positioning himself as an opponent of the elites and a supporter of workers. That is indeed populism.</p> <p>Edit to add: Biden may have been implicitly taking a shot at Bernie when he said that we shouldn't place all the blame on corporate America but of course Bernie doesn't place all the blame on corporate America. In any event, Biden's next sentence is populist - "It is true that the balance has shifted too much in favor of corporations and against workers."</p> <p>The reason this is populism is because Biden is describing the essential struggle in America as one between those who champion the economic elites on one side with workers and the middle-class and formerly middle-class on the other.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 23 Sep 2017 23:27:33 +0000 HSG comment 243102 at http://dagblog.com Many of the earlier articles http://dagblog.com/comment/243103#comment-243103 <a id="comment-243103"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/243101#comment-243101">Is populism democracy’s</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><u>Many of the earlier articles in their populism series look intriguing, all the more so because they are looking at this from outside the American &amp; European bubbles:</u></p> <p>September 7, 2017</p> <p><a href="https://theconversation.com/progressive-politics-is-losing-to-a-fantasy-state-of-mind-79499">Progressive politics is losing to a fantasy state of mind</a></p> <p><a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/mick-chisnall-383983">MIck Chisnall</a>, <em>University of Canberra</em></p> <div><em>Why are we increasingly seeing voters support candidates whose policies are, superficially at least, against their own interests?</em></div> <p>August 10, 2017</p> <p><a href="https://theconversation.com/we-frown-on-voters-ambivalence-about-democracy-but-they-might-just-save-it-80083">We frown on voters’ ambivalence about democracy, but they might just save it</a></p> <p><a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/adele-webb-95092">Adele Webb</a>, <em>University of Sydney</em></p> <div><em>Ambivalence among voters is reason to think about how democracy is working for us as a community. To keep democracy alive we need to be sceptical about the exercise of power and keep it in check.</em></div> <p>July 20, 2017</p> <p><a href="https://theconversation.com/everyday-makers-defy-populists-false-promise-to-embody-your-voice-78762">Everyday makers defy populists’ false promise to embody ‘your voice’</a></p> <p><a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/henrik-bang-313661">Henrik Bang</a>, <em>University of Canberra</em></p> <div><em>The only exceptional leaders we need today are the ones who help us to govern and take care of ourselves.</em></div> <p>July 11, 2017</p> <p><a href="https://theconversation.com/modis-polarising-populism-makes-a-fiction-of-a-secular-democratic-india-80605">Modi’s polarising populism makes a fiction of a secular, democratic India</a></p> <p><a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/irfan-ahmad-179601">Irfan Ahmad</a>, <em>Max Planck Institute</em></p> <div><em>For decades, India's Hindu and Muslim populations have been at odds, and it comes down to more than just religion.</em></div> <p>June 6, 2017</p> <p><a href="https://theconversation.com/deliberative-democracy-must-rise-to-the-threat-of-populist-rhetoric-76576">Deliberative democracy must rise to the threat of populist rhetoric</a></p> <p><a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/nicole-curato-138425">Nicole Curato</a>, <em>University of Canberra</em> and <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/lucy-j-parry-300977">Lucy J Parry</a>, <em>University of Canberra</em></p> <div><em>Populist politics would appear to have left deliberative democracy by the wayside, but innovations that engage citizens in reasoned decision-making have much to offer.</em></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 23 Sep 2017 23:25:06 +0000 artappraiser comment 243103 at http://dagblog.com Is populism democracy’s http://dagblog.com/comment/243101#comment-243101 <a id="comment-243101"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/joe-biden-s-platform-2020-anti-populism-23549">Joe Biden’s Platform for 2020: Anti-Populism</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://theconversation.com/is-populism-democracys-deadly-cure-82592"><strong>Is populism democracy’s deadly cure?</strong></a></p> <p>By Simon Tormey @ TheConversation.com, Sept. 20</p> <p>Tormey is <em>Professor of Political Theory and Head of the School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Sydney.</em></p> <p><em>This article is part of the <a href="https://theconversation.com/au/topics/democracy-futures">Democracy Futures</a> project, a <a href="http://sydneydemocracynetwork.org/democracy-futures/">joint global initiative</a> between The Conversation and <a href="http://sydneydemocracynetwork.org/">Sydney Democracy Network</a>. The project aims to stimulate fresh thinking about the many challenges facing democracies in the 21st century.</em></p> <p><em>This piece is part of a series, <a href="https://theconversation.com/au/topics/after-populism-39385">After Populism</a>, about the challenges populism poses for democracy. It comes from a talk at the <a href="http://sydneydemocracynetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Populism-Symposium-6-April-2017.pdf">Populism: What’s Next for Democracy?</a> symposium hosted by the <a href="http://www.governanceinstitute.edu.au/">Institute for Governance &amp; Policy Analysis</a> at the University of Canberra in collaboration with <a href="http://sydneydemocracynetwork.org/">Sydney Democracy Network</a>.</em></p> </div></div></div> Sat, 23 Sep 2017 23:18:49 +0000 artappraiser comment 243101 at http://dagblog.com