dagblog - Comments for "Amongst Its Diverse Weaponry Are..." http://dagblog.com/amonsgt-its-diverse-weaponry-are-23712 Comments for "Amongst Its Diverse Weaponry Are..." en Ah, Milwaukee. King of more http://dagblog.com/comment/244080#comment-244080 <a id="comment-244080"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/244076#comment-244076">re: Talk radio fuck yeah! </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2017/10/voter-suppression-wisconsin-election-2016/">Ah, Milwaukee</a>. King of more than just beer.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 19 Oct 2017 20:30:46 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 244080 at http://dagblog.com And all that brought to mind http://dagblog.com/comment/244077#comment-244077 <a id="comment-244077"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/244076#comment-244076">re: Talk radio fuck yeah! </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>And all that brought to mind that I saw someone use the Tokyo Rose comparison in an op-ed a day or two ago! Just googled for it and ta-dah, here it is in free access "reprint" at The Royal Gazette: Anne Applebaum @ WaPo:  <a href="http://www.royalgazette.com/opinion/article/20171017/if-russia-can-create-fake-blm-accounts-who-will-next">If Russia can create fake BLM accounts, who will next?</a></p> <p>The Gazette added it's own illustration for Applebaum's piece,which is fun:</p> <p><img alt="" height="112" src="http://www.royalgazette.com/storyimage/RG/20171017/COMMENT/171019768/AR/0/AR-171019768.jpg&amp;Logo=/images/rglogo1.gif&amp;LogoXPos=5&amp;LogoYPos=5&amp;maxw=630&amp;maxh=350" width="200" /></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 19 Oct 2017 18:57:43 +0000 artappraiser comment 244077 at http://dagblog.com re: Talk radio fuck yeah! http://dagblog.com/comment/244076#comment-244076 <a id="comment-244076"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/244075#comment-244075">Talk radio fuck yeah! When I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>re: <em>Talk radio fuck yeah! </em></p> <p>My little brother back home in Milwaukee, <u><em>Wisconsin</em></u> (underline to remind of who won the election there) has complained to me for like 5 yrs. or more how pervasive really obnoxious conservative talk radio is there. How the audience is really big and also gets lots of listeners who aren't conservative, because they just like the troll action, the emotional riling up of the "characters", the kayfabe as it were. (Pro wrestling has been very popular there forever--my grandmother liked it!)  He also has noted that the whole troll debate action appeal is available on sports talk radio, too. And that the most popular political talk radio is not for the most part the national guys like Limbaugh, bu<u>t local hosts</u> on local more than national issues (I.E.: Scott Walker, of course; Sheriff David Clarke: of course even more.) I very much recall how he was complaining about it affecting local political issues a great deal, way before this last election, because it really gets him upset (as in: I gotta get outta this town.)</p> <p>Then there's this, which made me think when I read it: I betcha it's similar in Arizona:</p> <p><a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/healthcare/343694-full-speech-john-mccain-on-key-senate-healthcare-vote"><em>Stop listening to the bombastic loudmouths on the radio and television and the Internet. To hell with them. They don’t want anything done for the public good. Our incapacity is their livelihood. </em></a></p> <p>Should be said that I do think it's mostly older folks partaking, not millenials, and it will eventually die off.</p> <p>Even here in the NYC area, you can see with your own eyes and ears at stop lights that it's popular with the guys whose jobs include driving around in pickup trucks with construction materials in the back or vans servicing businesses and homes</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 19 Oct 2017 18:49:01 +0000 artappraiser comment 244076 at http://dagblog.com Talk radio fuck yeah! When I http://dagblog.com/comment/244075#comment-244075 <a id="comment-244075"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/244068#comment-244068">now fetishized the power of</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Talk radio fuck yeah! When I was home last, it was a 24x7 mix of political views &amp; religious programs, you can imagine how liberal the slant was.</p> <p>However, besides the level of internet penetration growing &amp; growing, there's also this social media platform called the bar. So even if you don't own a Google, someone at the bar probably has one and they can talk shit and trade stories til the cows come home, literally. Hey, did ya see this cat video? or was it a pussy video - I forget which.</p> <p><img alt="" height="386" src="http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2016/09/FT_16.09.07_notOnline_trend.png" width="310" /></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 19 Oct 2017 15:50:31 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 244075 at http://dagblog.com Thanks for the info. http://dagblog.com/comment/244074#comment-244074 <a id="comment-244074"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/244073#comment-244073">Here is a Pew study on the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks for the info.</p> <p>I would add, as to AA above, no one needs (1) a computer or (2) a cable TV connection to have their brains reprogrammed daily with Fox News propaganda. They can watch it on their phones on YouTube. Hannity has his own YouTube channel.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 19 Oct 2017 15:47:05 +0000 NCD comment 244074 at http://dagblog.com Here is a Pew study on the http://dagblog.com/comment/244073#comment-244073 <a id="comment-244073"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/amonsgt-its-diverse-weaponry-are-23712">Amongst Its Diverse Weaponry Are...</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Here is a Pew study on the differences in news sources for Clinton, Trump, and Sanders supporters.</p> <p><a href="http://www.journalism.org/2017/01/18/trump-clinton-voters-divided-in-their-main-source-for-election-news/">http://www.journalism.org/2017/01/18/trump-clinton-voters-divided-in-their-main-source-for-election-news/</a></p> <p>Have at it. Fox dominated among Republicans. Democratic sources were much more diverse.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 19 Oct 2017 15:27:04 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 244073 at http://dagblog.com This seems right to me.  The http://dagblog.com/comment/244072#comment-244072 <a id="comment-244072"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/244069#comment-244069">P.S. Just occurred to me:</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>This seems right to me.  <em>The Apprentice </em>effectively built the character of Trump as a highly successful businessman with a lot of power, credibility and smarts. That probably had a lot more to do with how some of these people voted than even "but, her emails."</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 19 Oct 2017 14:59:41 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 244072 at http://dagblog.com P.S. Just occurred to me: http://dagblog.com/comment/244069#comment-244069 <a id="comment-244069"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/244068#comment-244068">now fetishized the power of</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>P.S. <img alt="enlightened" height="23" src="http://cdn.ckeditor.com/4.5.6/full-all/plugins/smiley/images/lightbulb.png" title="enlightened" width="23" /> Just occurred to me: <em>The Apprentice</em> was on broadcast TV, NBC. You didn't have to pay for cable to watch it. You didn't have to have a computer and internet to know who he was and how he acted. Bet it had more influence on certain people getting off the couch to vote for once in a decade than all of the Russbots put together.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 19 Oct 2017 13:39:59 +0000 artappraiser comment 244069 at http://dagblog.com now fetishized the power of http://dagblog.com/comment/244068#comment-244068 <a id="comment-244068"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/amonsgt-its-diverse-weaponry-are-23712">Amongst Its Diverse Weaponry Are...</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>now fetishized the power of social networks. </em></p> <p>I so agree! This is part of what I was just trying to say over at<a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/244062#comment-244062"> PP's news thread on Tennessee Republican/ Russian retweets.</a></p> <p>You know, gets me thinking further. I read all this stuff here and everywhere else on the influence of Breitbart and Russbots and fake Twitter and Facebook accounts and Fox News and whatever on influencing the election. And then I read an in depth piece at like WaPo or NYT on some godforsaken Trump voting poor community in Appalachia or whatever. And there's this important disconnect: the latter people can't afford to pay the cable TV bill much less have data access on their clamshell phone!  I am quite certain that these Trump-voting people in the WaPo and NYT articles aren't reading Breitbart every day. Maybe, maybe, they know a little about how to navigate Facebook. Maybe they did it a couple a times, inbetween hunting for specialty herbs and scrap metal to sell. Maybe they turn on Fox News <em>once a month</em>, those months when the cable bill is paid and on a day when the kids aren't screaming.</p> <p>I do think it's important to keep a perspective that Trump did not win a majority vote but won by targeting a few specific states.</p> <p>Edit to add: and I highly suspect lots of Trump voters got their political information the old fashioned way: on political talk radio which they listen to while driving or on the job. But that's just me and I have no proof.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 19 Oct 2017 13:34:17 +0000 artappraiser comment 244068 at http://dagblog.com