dagblog - Comments for "On Counts and Balances"

Pigfucker Andy 'opportunist'

PeraclesPlease — Sat, 18 Nov 2017 12:38:00 +0000

In reply to But I've been told here many

Pigfucker Andy 'opportunist' Sullivan uses his NY Mag piece today to turn Moore's transgressions back to "Hillary covering up for Bill" as told to the *Drudge Report*¡!!??! He deserves a bit of good old Catholic Inquisition, the piece of shit. So just as Brazile's unfair piece last month raked over old coals with a dishonest light, Andrew's back with his irrational Clinton hate to balance his irrational Austrian school fanboism. And did he mention he's a devout considerate Catholic when the fucker's not busy pontificating and talking badmouth shit about people? "Do unto others as you would like to see in a Tarantino film". Classy work there, Andy boy. Did I mention you're a pig fucker? - not sure if there's a space there, or whether those erudite Brits do it the other way, so here you can have it both ways as you like it - fake pretending intellectual and fawning pretending populist lowbrow - or "dumb and dumber" as they say in the movies. Two middle fingers up, as Roger Ebert might say.

This type of cynical

Peter — Wed, 08 Nov 2017 01:21:41 +0000

In reply to overthrow the globalist's

This type of cynical snowflake projection is only convincing to the snowflakes while everyone else sees desperation and fear of powerful ideas. Bannon is leading a wave of populism and some people are terrified saying and doing most anything to make the bad man go away. It's not working and this along with the Putin Did It meme is opeaning them up to more mocking and ridicule along with more losses at the polls. FYI, Lenin screwed the people of Russia while becoming the party elite.

Why is it that AA can bring

rmrd0000 — Tue, 07 Nov 2017 23:47:29 +0000

In reply to Basta, prego.

Why is it that AA can bring her black family members into the discussion but I cannot respond?

Basta, prego.

PeraclesPlease — Tue, 07 Nov 2017 22:56:21 +0000

In reply to BTW

Basta, prego.

BTW

rmrd0000 — Tue, 07 Nov 2017 21:57:17 +0000

In reply to Shortsighted. You energize

BTW

You should encourage your black family members to post at dagblog.

Trump's Party purges, the

NCD — Tue, 07 Nov 2017 21:22:53 +0000

In reply to You seem to believe most

Trump's Party purges, the obsequious sycophants he surrounds himself with, the attacks on critics, and even threats to prosecute and lock up political opponents, the "only I matter", "only I can fix it", the ignoring of reality and desire for a controlled press, and the Adoration Cult Rallies make Trump a demagogue, a modern Stalinist.

I link to articles and polls

rmrd0000 — Tue, 07 Nov 2017 21:14:16 +0000

In reply to I heard about rural white

I link to articles and polls showing black voter’s dissatisfaction with Democrats. Northam’s ham-handedness is a case in point. There are few black voices at dagblog. I support my opinions with links. I am then accused of taking the position of the sole black voice. This is garbage.

Regarding outreach, local Democrats say that outreach is important.

—

“Part of our perspective in engaging black voters is that it has to be a long-term engagement and it has to start early,” Shropshire said. “The idea of engaging voters and black voters in particular in the final two weeks really isn’t the path to winning long term.”

“Deep long-term engagement with elections is important, part of the lesson in all of this is we have to start talking to voters earlier.”

—

http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/356488-dems-aim-to-boost-black-turnout-in-va-gov-race

Democrats can continue to show up late and lose elections

I heard about rural white

PeraclesPlease — Tue, 07 Nov 2017 20:47:05 +0000

In reply to My argument is that whites

I heard about rural white voters for a couple months; the solliness seems to have subsided a fair bit.

My argument is that whites

rmrd0000 — Tue, 07 Nov 2017 19:50:02 +0000

In reply to The image of blacks begging

My argument is that whites don’t vote for Democratic Party members, yet the Democrats chase these voters

From HuffPost

Since the 2016 election, all I’ve heard about are rural white voters and how they were so distraught about the economy they elected Trump, even as Republican policies will negatively affect the majority of them. There has been town hall after town hall to talk to these voters, and numerous articles on all the liberal media. It was particularly frustrating because no one went into black communities to ask them why they voted for Hillary. There weren’t numerous op-eds to discuss why the black communities did what they did, because people didn’t care.

The DNC, in its effort to appease the unappeasable Bernie Sanders and his supporters, have started again chasing these rural white voters, too. The DNC actually created a unity commission with a bunch of people except the people who vote time and time again for Democrats, black voters. Our needs and wants are pushed to the background to make way for fickle, millennial supporters of Bernie Sanders. Now, with an election on the line which will be the first real test of the Trump presidency, Democrats want to lay a loss at the feet of black voters.

Right now, Northam is polling around 37 percent with white voters. That’s after all the blatant racists’ ads from the Gillespie campaign. Why aren’t white voters coming out to stop the white supremacists in Virginia? Why aren’t they coming out to send a message that Virginia is better than what happened in Charlottesville? Northam is running on expanding Medicaid, sensible gun legislation, investment in schools and infrastructure. This isn’t a “black-centric” platform, so why is his support with white Virginians so low.

Either way, if Northam squeaks out a win, white voters will be applauded. If Northam loses, black enthusiasm will be blamed. It is mind-boggling that after the 2016 election, the only lesson the democrats have learned is to chase even harder after unicorns: rural white Democrats

overthrow the globalist's

artappraiser — Tue, 07 Nov 2017 18:57:41 +0000

In reply to You seem to believe most

overthrow the globalist's hold on the government but that is hardly Leninist

No, that is Leninist. You are in denial of what you are agreeing with by calling your opponents commie redistributionists.

This, too is Leninist:

“I don’t need the affirmation of the mainstream media. I don’t care what they say. They can call me an anti-Semite. They can call me racist. They call me nativist. You can call me anything you want. Okay? As long as we’re driving this agenda for the working men and women of this country, I’m happy.”

from http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/09/11/steve-bannon-25-key-quotes-60-minutes-interview/

Bannon is far more of a Leninist than your opponents. In his own rhetoric Bannon is against the "elites" and "the working people" are supposedly on his side.

From the Wikipedia entry

Hence, the purpose of the Leninist vanguard party is to establish a democratic dictatorship of the proletariat; supported by the working class, the vanguard party would lead the revolution to depose the incumbent Tsarist government, and then transfer power of government to the working class, which change of ruling class—from bourgeoisie to proletariat—makes possible the full development of socialism.[8]