dagblog - Comments for "On Donna Brazile..." http://dagblog.com/donna-brazile-23850 Comments for "On Donna Brazile..." en Huh. Is there more context to http://dagblog.com/comment/245153#comment-245153 <a id="comment-245153"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/donna-brazile-23850">On Donna Brazile...</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Huh. Is there more context to this, or is that it? <a href="https://t.co/40zZAN3iIJ">https://t.co/40zZAN3iIJ</a></p> — Annie Karni (@anniekarni) <a href="https://twitter.com/anniekarni/status/930424376490635265?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 14, 2017</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p> <p> </p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>She was discussing how she wasn't getting paid for her work at the DNC, the financial pressure it put on her and threw that in as a punchline at the end.</p> — Karen Tumulty (@ktumulty) <a href="https://twitter.com/ktumulty/status/930431027633381377?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 14, 2017</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 15 Nov 2017 03:45:11 +0000 artappraiser comment 245153 at http://dagblog.com Bernie may be some form of http://dagblog.com/comment/245138#comment-245138 <a id="comment-245138"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/244957#comment-244957">“...from the party</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Bernie may be some form of senatorial  "establishment," but not the Democratic Party Establishment, which he did indeed run against in every possible way.  He never was a Democrat; he just pretended to be one so he could use their resources.  </p> <p>Although I agree that he might not have expected a warm reception, he sure was willing to whine about rules that were in place long before he showed up, and complain about every detail he didn't agree with, bitter to the end about the "establishment."</p> <p>In the end he seems to have been pretty savvy for the Sanders Family; his net worth seems to have grown quite a bit, although it is really unknown, because, like trump he refused to show his taxes.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 13 Nov 2017 23:18:59 +0000 CVille Dem comment 245138 at http://dagblog.com Of course - anytime you have http://dagblog.com/comment/245023#comment-245023 <a id="comment-245023"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/245020#comment-245020">book marketing is a tough gig</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Of course - anytime you have the other side giving good soundbite...</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 09 Nov 2017 09:09:22 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 245023 at http://dagblog.com book marketing is a tough gig http://dagblog.com/comment/245020#comment-245020 <a id="comment-245020"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/244978#comment-244978">Hey, book marketing is a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>book marketing is a tough gig</em></p> <p>It appears that's an understatement in this particular case. In<a href="https://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2017/11/election-what-election.html"> a link to a Digby post</a> that Peracles just cited elsewhere, there's a snapshot of Fox News home page from Weds, meant to show how they were ignoring the election results. Instead, what I noticed is she's become a Fox News star! Donna gets two pictures, Trump only one. Clear that they wanted to make sure nobody missed her interview with Tucker Carlson...</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 09 Nov 2017 07:00:12 +0000 artappraiser comment 245020 at http://dagblog.com so 6 hrs. ago on The Real http://dagblog.com/comment/245007#comment-245007 <a id="comment-245007"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/244995#comment-244995">Trump&#039;s as &quot;authentic&quot; and </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>so 6 hrs. ago on The Real Donald Trump it's yay go Team Trump we are the yuge minority being picked on by the bully majority, but we are still here, can't take us down. Surprised it didn't go into the yuge size of the inauguration crowd:</p> <p> </p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Congratulations to all of the ”DEPLORABLES” and the millions of people who gave us a MASSIVE (304-227) Electoral College landslide victory! <a href="https://t.co/7ifv5gT7Ur">pic.twitter.com/7ifv5gT7Ur</a></p> — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/928325667556548608?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 8, 2017</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p> <p>He is not going away, even if removed from office, even if in a jail cell, gonna dig in his heels, attack attack attack anything anti-Trump, anti-Trump verifies the delusion, it means he not only exists but is a yuge spectacular draw, a star, all news is good news.</p> <p>(I paste the tweet so not another click goes there...)</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:21:26 +0000 artappraiser comment 245007 at http://dagblog.com Why the question mark? Why http://dagblog.com/comment/245001#comment-245001 <a id="comment-245001"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/244998#comment-244998">you make a good point, he is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Why the question mark? Why the hesitant "like" qualifier? Reality making you shy, or have you looked in his eyes and seen something I haven't seen?</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 08 Nov 2017 23:14:31 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 245001 at http://dagblog.com you make a good point, he is http://dagblog.com/comment/244998#comment-244998 <a id="comment-244998"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/244995#comment-244995">Trump&#039;s as &quot;authentic&quot; and </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>you make a good point, he is really a special case, there is no possibility of coming close to the meaning of authentic because: he is like a p.r. person working for his narcissist authentic self, who considers himself a talented p.r. person, rinse and repeat...scary it's like there is no soul there?</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 08 Nov 2017 22:55:58 +0000 artappraiser comment 244998 at http://dagblog.com Trump's as "authentic" and http://dagblog.com/comment/244995#comment-244995 <a id="comment-244995"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/244994#comment-244994">I give a great deal of credit</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Trump's as "authentic" and "believable" as a TV preacher. But I can't prevent people's willing suspension of disbelief. Yes, we happily accept lies if they build up our team, and we even use lies as a signal that we're on the team. That's just our basic psychological makeup, as confirmed more this past year or two.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 08 Nov 2017 20:45:38 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 244995 at http://dagblog.com I give a great deal of credit http://dagblog.com/comment/244994#comment-244994 <a id="comment-244994"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/244986#comment-244986">See my previous comment -</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I give a great deal of credit for that to SNL and all our comedians for hitting on spinmeisters like Kellyanne and Spicey very hard and in brilliant ways, really I do. I said that the comedians will help us at the start of Trump's presidency and I think they have. Once ridicule of the worst, the "meisters", goes viral, people who only glance at news on occasion start questioning what they look at. The danger now is cynicism, the all politicians are lying shitheads thing. And for candidates to appear "authentic",. that's hard to do in this day and age when they've got to hire pros to help them out and then those pros are always making them second guess what they say. (On the other hand, Trump being Mr. Authentic true to self, that's a big fail, hah; even diehard fans wish he would quit with spilling out his id on Twitter.)</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 08 Nov 2017 20:38:04 +0000 artappraiser comment 244994 at http://dagblog.com See my previous comment - http://dagblog.com/comment/244986#comment-244986 <a id="comment-244986"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/244984#comment-244984">I am actually surprised all</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>See my previous comment - reality has bit people hard. Stirring up fantasies will likely get shorter shrift this year. Fake news will have a harder time passing as real news - for a while, before we settle back into more comfortable habits.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 08 Nov 2017 18:37:39 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 244986 at http://dagblog.com