dagblog - Comments for "Steve Bannon Was for Ed Gillespie Before Bannon was Against Ed Gillespie " http://dagblog.com/link/steve-bannon-was-ed-gillespie-bannon-was-against-ed-gillespie-23861 Comments for "Steve Bannon Was for Ed Gillespie Before Bannon was Against Ed Gillespie " en more alone! gut punch! for http://dagblog.com/comment/245049#comment-245049 <a id="comment-245049"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/245044#comment-245044">Not so sad, really  - a dude</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>more </em>alone! gut punch! for now that is, who knows what tomorrow will bring</p> <p>(tweet copied because I couldn't get a embed to take)</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="account-group js-account-group js-action-profile js-user-profile-link js-nav" href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump"><strong>Donald J. Trump</strong>‏@<strong>realDonaldTrump</strong></a></p> <div> <p>In the coming months and years ahead I look forward to building an even STRONGER relationship between the United States and China.</p> </div> <div><a class="u-linkBlend u-url customisable-highlight long-permalink" href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/928622838487007260">8:58 AM - Nov 9, 2017</a></div> <div> </div> </blockquote> <p>Nov. 7 @ Breitbart: <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/radio/2017/11/07/bannon-china-is-an-enemy-of-incalculable-power-not-a-strategic-partner-and-we-have-to-understand-that/"> Bannon: China Is ‘an Enemy of Incalculable Power, Not a Strategic Partner and We Have to Understand That’</a></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 09 Nov 2017 22:33:56 +0000 artappraiser comment 245049 at http://dagblog.com Not so sad, really  - a dude http://dagblog.com/comment/245044#comment-245044 <a id="comment-245044"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/245041#comment-245041">gone off the deep end into</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Not so sad, really  - a dude like Bannon belongs alone.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 09 Nov 2017 19:13:47 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 245044 at http://dagblog.com gone off the deep end into http://dagblog.com/comment/245041#comment-245041 <a id="comment-245041"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/steve-bannon-was-ed-gillespie-bannon-was-against-ed-gillespie-23861">Steve Bannon Was for Ed Gillespie Before Bannon was Against Ed Gillespie </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>gone off the deep end into deep-state-conspiracy land; current headline @ Breitbart:</p> <p><em>After Endorsing Democrat in Alabama, Bezos’s Washington Post Plans to Hit Roy Moore with Allegations of Inappropriate Relations with Teenagers; Judge Claims Smear Campaign</em></p> <p>As<a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/244993#comment-244993"> I noted on the "Northam Wins" thread,</a> kinda pitiful that Moore is the only candidate he really has to support?</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 09 Nov 2017 18:17:12 +0000 artappraiser comment 245041 at http://dagblog.com Fox News tries to ignore http://dagblog.com/comment/245017#comment-245017 <a id="comment-245017"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/steve-bannon-was-ed-gillespie-bannon-was-against-ed-gillespie-23861">Steve Bannon Was for Ed Gillespie Before Bannon was Against Ed Gillespie </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2017/11/election-what-election.html">Fox News tries to ignore election</a> - almost breaks out teletubbies on web site as diversion.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 09 Nov 2017 06:08:32 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 245017 at http://dagblog.com If it weren't for this nation http://dagblog.com/comment/245016#comment-245016 <a id="comment-245016"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/steve-bannon-was-ed-gillespie-bannon-was-against-ed-gillespie-23861">Steve Bannon Was for Ed Gillespie Before Bannon was Against Ed Gillespie </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>If it weren't for this nation's ethnic/racial diversity Trump would have goose stepping mercenaries parading down Constitution Ave. and the GOP wouldn't care as long as the rich got tax cuts.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 09 Nov 2017 06:03:21 +0000 NCD comment 245016 at http://dagblog.com The current Governor lost the http://dagblog.com/comment/245015#comment-245015 <a id="comment-245015"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/steve-bannon-was-ed-gillespie-bannon-was-against-ed-gillespie-23861">Steve Bannon Was for Ed Gillespie Before Bannon was Against Ed Gillespie </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The current Governor lost the white vote (56-36) just like Northam lost the white vote (57-42). McAuliffe won the black vote 90-8, similar to Obama’s 93-6. Northam won the black vote 86-13. It will be interesting to see what factors drove 13% of black voters to support Gillespie.</p> <p><a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/news/other/black-voters-were-big-reason-mcauliffe-won-virginia-f8C11545231">https://www.nbcnews.com/news/other/black-voters-were-big-reason-mcauliffe-won-virginia-f8C11545231</a></p> </div></div></div> Thu, 09 Nov 2017 05:27:30 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 245015 at http://dagblog.com