dagblog - Comments for "MATT LAUER AND O&#039;REILLY" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/matt-lauer-and-oreilly-23979 Comments for "MATT LAUER AND O'REILLY" en Oh rmrd;like I do not http://dagblog.com/comment/245651#comment-245651 <a id="comment-245651"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/245649#comment-245649">I recall the &#039;dick&#039; thingy.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Oh rmrd;like I do not misspell things all the time.</p> <p>A lot of readers used to give a shit about my spellings. hahahahah</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 03 Dec 2017 23:31:26 +0000 Richard Day comment 245651 at http://dagblog.com I recall the 'dick' thingy. http://dagblog.com/comment/245649#comment-245649 <a id="comment-245649"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/245642#comment-245642">Wow, I misspelled the sexual</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I recall the 'dick' thingy.</p> <p>It hit home.</p> <p>hahahhaahah</p> <p>I always hated that dick halperin I mean for years. hahahahahah;; </p> <p>Yeah, and like you intimate the issue always involves the powerful against the powerless.</p> <p>I am always taken back to Pete Seeger:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed" height="360px" width="640px"><iframe allow="encrypted-media" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" gesture="media" height="360px" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/5iAIM02kv0g" width="640px"></iframe></div> </div></div></div> Sun, 03 Dec 2017 23:26:57 +0000 Richard Day comment 245649 at http://dagblog.com Wow, I misspelled the sexual http://dagblog.com/comment/245642#comment-245642 <a id="comment-245642"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/245641#comment-245641">RMRD this link is so very</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Wow, I misspelled the sexual predator’s name</p> <p>It is interesting that Mark Halperin was suspended previously by MSNBC for calling President Barack Obama a “dick”. He saw nothing wrong with a sexual predator like a Trump because he was one. Halperin thought his rich, white privilege allowed him to call President Obama a “dick”.</p> <p><a href="https://www.politico.com/story/2011/06/mark-halperin-suspended-by-msnbc-058098">https://www.politico.com/story/2011/06/mark-halperin-suspended-by-msnbc-058098</a></p> <p>This is where we stand. The folks who come after women, will also come after blacks, Latinos, gays, and Asians. Trump grabs vaginas and uses the racial slur “Pocahontas”. People who are not Conservative rich, white males are lumped into the identity politics category. The Democratic Party has to fight for identity politics because that is everybody but the 1%.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 03 Dec 2017 22:13:19 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 245642 at http://dagblog.com RMRD this link is so very http://dagblog.com/comment/245641#comment-245641 <a id="comment-245641"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/245634#comment-245634">AM Joy is doing a segment on</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>RMRD this link is so very very important.</p> <p>This fits into this canard that somehow main stream media is liberal.</p> <p>Lauer is not liberal and has never been liberal.</p> <p>Lauer has only cared about his 'providers'.</p> <p>And yet, his providers have had to take away his pot of gold after he was caught.</p> <p>UNDER THE BUS MATT GOES.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sun, 03 Dec 2017 21:56:15 +0000 Richard Day comment 245641 at http://dagblog.com AM Joy is doing a segment on http://dagblog.com/comment/245634#comment-245634 <a id="comment-245634"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/matt-lauer-and-oreilly-23979">MATT LAUER AND O&#039;REILLY</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>AM Joy is doing a segment on sexism in media. A portion deals with Laurer’s rough treatment of Hillary Clinton. Hillary was critized and interrupted by Laurer repeatedly. Laurer was treated with kid gloves. </p> <p>There is a must read article in the NYT that targets the men who we now know are sexual predators. These news media icons helped form opinions of Hillary Clinton. At one point, Mark Halperin said that it was a victory for Trump if all the opposition had was the “Access Hollywood” gape.</p> <p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/01/opinion/matt-lauer-hillary-clinton.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/01/opinion/matt-lauer-hillary-clinton.html</a></p> </div></div></div> Sun, 03 Dec 2017 16:14:36 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 245634 at http://dagblog.com Supposedly locking the door http://dagblog.com/comment/245633#comment-245633 <a id="comment-245633"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/245602#comment-245602">Oh yeah. His image is what</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Supposedly locking the door to keep women from escaping is a bit more aggressive and tangible to confirm or imply than "he touched my thigh" or "he kissed me too hard".</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 03 Dec 2017 12:44:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 245633 at http://dagblog.com Oh yeah. His image is what http://dagblog.com/comment/245602#comment-245602 <a id="comment-245602"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/245597#comment-245597">Now Lauer claims he should be</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Oh yeah. His image is what they bought, and it's ruined. As to this being "trial by headline", I think it should be easy for a media company to figure out whether any accusations against an image are likely to convince the target audience or not. I.E., if the accusers would look fishy to the audience, they'd stick behind their guy. If they look substantive: you're fired, you didn't protect the image you sold us as carefully as you should have. Is not a court of law, nor even the case of an elected official  this is about the art of remaining popular, the contract a sale of a brand.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 02 Dec 2017 21:02:22 +0000 artappraiser comment 245602 at http://dagblog.com Now Lauer claims he should be http://dagblog.com/comment/245597#comment-245597 <a id="comment-245597"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/matt-lauer-and-oreilly-23979">MATT LAUER AND O&#039;REILLY</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Now Lauer claims he should be paid through the end of his contract. Ie:  all of 2018.  I guess I shouldn’t be surprised. So far NBC is a big NO on that because he was fired for cause.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 02 Dec 2017 18:09:18 +0000 CVille Dem comment 245597 at http://dagblog.com during the 1990's taxpayers http://dagblog.com/comment/245549#comment-245549 <a id="comment-245549"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/matt-lauer-and-oreilly-23979">MATT LAUER AND O&#039;REILLY</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>during the 1990's taxpayers paid out over 17 million bucks in claims against Congressmen </em></p> <p>Interesting to me to find that the <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/may/13/we-can-no-longer-stay-silent-fury-erupts-over-sexism-in-french-politics"> "mad as hell, not going to take it anymore" has been going on with French parliament since the middle of 2016.</a></p> <p>So it's not that the current mania spread from here to there. Sounds almost like they are still stuck back in the 90's or earlier. Some of the stories in the link are really blatant, disgusting, demeaning workplace sexual harassment. I mean the kind like we used to have in car repair shops, but mostly stopped long ago after the EEOC got involved or whatever. Really just meant to make sure women's primary role is sex object and everything else comes after that and that man is the hunter and woman the prey.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 01 Dec 2017 03:09:33 +0000 artappraiser comment 245549 at http://dagblog.com I  think  O'Reillys has been http://dagblog.com/comment/245541#comment-245541 <a id="comment-245541"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/245540#comment-245540">BTW. I couldn’t watch the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I  think  O'Reillys has been going downhill fast  Billo has had his problems with the truth all his life.</p> <p>Just like our Prez! </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 30 Nov 2017 23:03:28 +0000 Richard Day comment 245541 at http://dagblog.com