dagblog - Comments for "It&#039;s pork barrel time." http://dagblog.com/link/its-pork-barrel-time-23989 Comments for "It's pork barrel time." en The odd things tucked into http://dagblog.com/comment/245622#comment-245622 <a id="comment-245622"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/its-pork-barrel-time-23989">It&#039;s pork barrel time.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote> <div> <p><a href="https://www.axios.com/the-odd-amendments-included-in-the-gop-tax-plan-2514179293.html">The odd things tucked into the GOP tax plan</a></p> <p>By Hayley Briskey @ Aixos.com, 14 hrs. ago.</p> <p>[....] These are small examples of what got slipped in the bill last-minute as the Senate vote neared, and some reveal senators' pet projects back in their home states.</p> </div> <div> <p><strong>Odd amendments included in the tax plan: </strong></p> <p>[....]</p> <p>Sen. Cory Gardner</p> <ul><li>Exempts kombucha, a fermented tea, from alcoholic beverage excise taxes and regulations.</li> <li>Allow deductions and credits relating to expenditures in connection with legal marijuana sales.</li> </ul><p>[....]</p> </div> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Sun, 03 Dec 2017 06:29:06 +0000 artappraiser comment 245622 at http://dagblog.com “The hypocrisy is astounding” http://dagblog.com/comment/245621#comment-245621 <a id="comment-245621"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/its-pork-barrel-time-23989">It&#039;s pork barrel time.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><div> <p><a href="https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/12/2/16724978/gop-tax-bill-deficit-debt-fraud">“The hypocrisy is astounding”: this tax bill shows the GOP’s debt concerns were pure fraud</a></p> </div> <p><em>Republicans are proving themselves nihilists.</em></p> <div>By Ezra Klein @ Vox.com, Dec 2</div> </div></div></div> Sun, 03 Dec 2017 05:25:49 +0000 artappraiser comment 245621 at http://dagblog.com Even here, seeing the same http://dagblog.com/comment/245619#comment-245619 <a id="comment-245619"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/245617#comment-245617">Some senators began sharing</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Even here, seeing the same complainf with the exact same text maybe hurts more than helps. I would have liked to se 12 examples - in one way this example is outrageous, in another, it's just "read the goddam written text already, it ain't that tough, not pretty but stop whining".</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 03 Dec 2017 04:38:25 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 245619 at http://dagblog.com My statement on the tax http://dagblog.com/comment/245618#comment-245618 <a id="comment-245618"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/its-pork-barrel-time-23989">It&#039;s pork barrel time.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>My statement on the tax reform legislation: <a href="https://t.co/LdTQRezdlO">pic.twitter.com/LdTQRezdlO</a></p> — Senator Bob Corker (@SenBobCorker) <a href="https://twitter.com/SenBobCorker/status/936714880253616128?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 1, 2017</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sun, 03 Dec 2017 04:36:42 +0000 artappraiser comment 245618 at http://dagblog.com Some senators began sharing http://dagblog.com/comment/245617#comment-245617 <a id="comment-245617"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/its-pork-barrel-time-23989">It&#039;s pork barrel time.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><div> <div><em>Some senators began sharing images of the legislation, which included handwritten additions along the margins. </em></div> </div> <p><img alt="" height="556" src="https://static01.nyt.com/images/2017/12/02/us/03dc-taxchaos-2/03dc-taxchaos-2-blog427.jpg" width="427" /></p> <p><em>In a separate video, Senator Elizabeth Warren, Democrat of Massachusetts, held up a stack of legislative text and tried to read the changes that the Republicans had made. She struggled to make sense of the garbled language and lamented that she could not possibly read the bill in the hour or so before the expected vote. </em></p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p><em>No, I haven’t had time to read the 500-page <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/GOPTaxScam?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#GOPTaxScam</a> bill that we’re voting on tonight. I couldn’t read it if I tried – and I did. <a href="https://t.co/WgoAT6rxuo">pic.twitter.com/WgoAT6rxuo</a></em></p> <em>— Elizabeth Warren (@SenWarren) <a href="https://twitter.com/SenWarren/status/936756302000414720?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 2, 2017</a></em></blockquote> </div> <p>From</p> <p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/01/us/politics/hand-scribbled-tax-bill-outcry.html?hp&amp;action=click&amp;pgtype=Homepage&amp;clickSource=image&amp;module=b-lede-package-region&amp;region=top-news&amp;WT.nav=top-news&amp;_r=0">A Hasty, Hand-Scribbled Tax Bill Sets Off an Outcry</a></p> <div> <p>By Jim Tankersly &amp; Alan Rappeport @ NYTimes.com, Dec. 1</p> </div> </div></div></div> Sun, 03 Dec 2017 04:34:52 +0000 artappraiser comment 245617 at http://dagblog.com So the GOP leadership got all http://dagblog.com/comment/245615#comment-245615 <a id="comment-245615"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/245611#comment-245611">Since no Democrats were</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>So the GOP leadership got all but one Republican to sign on to a bill most Republicans supported. This made the bill more favorable for Democratic Party members. .........Alrighty then. Democrats should be rejoicing. The poor and the middle class should be glad.</p> <p>Talk about lipstick on a pig.</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 03 Dec 2017 02:14:32 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 245615 at http://dagblog.com Since no Democrats were http://dagblog.com/comment/245611#comment-245611 <a id="comment-245611"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/245607#comment-245607">P.S. you and rmrd are</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Since no Democrats were consulted on it's content, were involved writing it, or voted for it, I realize it satisfied Republican causes not Democrat.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 02 Dec 2017 22:09:35 +0000 NCD comment 245611 at http://dagblog.com What were the last-minute http://dagblog.com/comment/245608#comment-245608 <a id="comment-245608"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/its-pork-barrel-time-23989">It&#039;s pork barrel time.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/what-were-the-last-minute-changes-to-the-senate-tax-bill">What were the last-minute changes to the Senate tax bill?</a></p> <p>Dec 2, 2017 4:10 pm ES @ PBS News Hour</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 02 Dec 2017 21:31:56 +0000 artappraiser comment 245608 at http://dagblog.com P.S. you and rmrd are http://dagblog.com/comment/245607#comment-245607 <a id="comment-245607"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/245604#comment-245604">In case you didn&#039;t notice,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>P.S. you and rmrd are certainly entitled to rant on your favorite political hobby horses wherever you want, and I have no problem with that, either. I just don't cotton to being made a straw man. Leave me out of it.</p> <p>And I think it's unfair to Drum as well, and The Hill piece that I posted; they are about the effect of pork barrel amendments and about lobbyists fine tuning big legislation to their benefit and away from intent.</p> <p>The result of this happening actually may have made the bill less antithetical to Dem causes, don't you realize that? They started out wanting to make a very conservative economics bill, and I don't think that is what they are going to end up with.</p> <p>Even they don't know, that's the point. The balkers mostly got something they wanted, that's all we know.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 02 Dec 2017 20:59:59 +0000 artappraiser comment 245607 at http://dagblog.com My comment and the story are http://dagblog.com/comment/245606#comment-245606 <a id="comment-245606"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/245603#comment-245603">We are in an era of both</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>My comment and the story are not at all about the bill. They are about the pork barrel amendments given to balking Senators in order to get them to sign on to the bill.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 02 Dec 2017 20:50:04 +0000 artappraiser comment 245606 at http://dagblog.com