dagblog - Comments for "Sanctions buster: Putin looks to other side of the Bitcoin" http://dagblog.com/link/sanctions-buster-putin-looks-other-side-bitcoin-24053 Comments for "Sanctions buster: Putin looks to other side of the Bitcoin" en Sometimes a new crypto http://dagblog.com/comment/253184#comment-253184 <a id="comment-253184"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/sanctions-buster-putin-looks-other-side-bitcoin-24053">Sanctions buster: Putin looks to other side of the Bitcoin</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Sometimes a new crypto currency appears as a fork (<a href="https://bitcoinbestbuy.com/wallets/">https://bitcoinbestbuy.com/wallets/</a>) from another cyto-currency by changing parameters, which makes them incompatible. At the same time, both crypto currencies can have a common transaction history up to the time of separation.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 31 May 2018 06:59:26 +0000 Sam comment 253184 at http://dagblog.com I sctually own the game (they http://dagblog.com/comment/245900#comment-245900 <a id="comment-245900"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/245880#comment-245880">No I didn&#039;t. So I looked it</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I sctually own the game (they still sell it) ;-)</p> <p>Besides for embarrassment when you don't play well, you can use it as a personal voodoo set, assigning names to the characters...</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 13 Dec 2017 04:30:33 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 245900 at http://dagblog.com No I didn't. So I looked it http://dagblog.com/comment/245880#comment-245880 <a id="comment-245880"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/245878#comment-245878">Ever play the game &quot;Blockhead</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>No I didn't. So I looked it up. And I see you have found not just an ad hominen but also a metaphor:</p> <p><em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockhead!"><strong>Blockhead!</strong> is a game invented in 1952 [...]  the object of the game is to add blocks to a tower without having it collapse on your turn </a></em> <em>The first player sets one of the blocks on a flat surface; this is the only block allowed to touch the base [....]</em></p> <p>Maybe Putin is also thinking of an extra added bonus?</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:55:59 +0000 artappraiser comment 245880 at http://dagblog.com Ever play the game "Blockhead http://dagblog.com/comment/245878#comment-245878 <a id="comment-245878"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/245875#comment-245875">I was thinking of putting</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ever play the game "Blockhead"?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 12 Dec 2017 23:12:22 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 245878 at http://dagblog.com I was thinking of putting http://dagblog.com/comment/245875#comment-245875 <a id="comment-245875"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/sanctions-buster-putin-looks-other-side-bitcoin-24053">Sanctions buster: Putin looks to other side of the Bitcoin</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I was thinking of putting this comment on the Millennials thread, but you conveniently offer an even more appropriate place:</p> <p><strong><u>BLOCKCHAIN!</u></strong></p> <p>So sorry, you old fuddy duddies now lose.</p> <p>YOU MADE FUN OF ALL OUR MARKETING AND CONFERENCES, didn't take us seriously, AND NOW ALL YOUR WORLD BELONG TO US!</p> <p><img alt="cheeky" height="23" src="http://cdn.ckeditor.com/4.5.6/full-all/plugins/smiley/images/tongue_smile.png" title="cheeky" width="23" /></p> </div></div></div> Tue, 12 Dec 2017 22:28:48 +0000 artappraiser comment 245875 at http://dagblog.com