dagblog - Comments for "Trump judicial nominee stumped on basic law questions at Senate hearing " http://dagblog.com/link/trump-judicial-nominee-stumped-basic-law-questions-senate-hearing-24079 Comments for "Trump judicial nominee stumped on basic law questions at Senate hearing " en It's actually three strike http://dagblog.com/comment/246094#comment-246094 <a id="comment-246094"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/trump-judicial-nominee-stumped-basic-law-questions-senate-hearing-24079">Trump judicial nominee stumped on basic law questions at Senate hearing </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It's actually three strike outs now:</p> <p><a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/365175-three-trump-judicial-nominees-stumble-with-republicans">Three Trump judicial nominees stumble — with Republicans</a></p> <div>@ TheHill- 12/17/17 04:07 PM EST</div> </div></div></div> Mon, 18 Dec 2017 03:40:19 +0000 artappraiser comment 246094 at http://dagblog.com