dagblog - Comments for "Federal Appeals Court: Civil Rights Act Protects Gay Workers" http://dagblog.com/link/federal-appeals-court-civil-rights-act-protects-gay-workers-24572 Comments for "Federal Appeals Court: Civil Rights Act Protects Gay Workers" en Ohm...   http://dagblog.com/comment/249229#comment-249229 <a id="comment-249229"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/249228#comment-249228">The posting problem at dag</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ohm...</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Feb 2018 04:50:32 +0000 barefooted comment 249229 at http://dagblog.com The posting problem at dag http://dagblog.com/comment/249228#comment-249228 <a id="comment-249228"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/249222#comment-249222">Sigh.  Thanks for the very</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The posting problem at dag can be immediately addressed. The article has to be read and considered before a comment can be posted. Be patient</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Feb 2018 04:39:50 +0000 ocean-kat comment 249228 at http://dagblog.com One of the frustrating things http://dagblog.com/comment/249225#comment-249225 <a id="comment-249225"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/federal-appeals-court-civil-rights-act-protects-gay-workers-24572">Federal Appeals Court: Civil Rights Act Protects Gay Workers</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>One of the frustrating things, to me, about the court's decision re gay marriage - and the ensuing joy - was that it really didn't change things for people in the real world.  Not everyone wanted to get married, they wanted to be equal.  As I recall it was debated here as well (with my involvement).  My frustration was that people could still be fired and refused housing, yet we think we've won something by them being able to marry?  Wonderful for those who required more than an agreement which gave them rights as spouses but not the financial and other truly essential rights that heterosexual couples enjoy.  I've always gotten and certainly championed that.  But it has never been enough.</p> <p>This is a shot at making people who simply lead a different personal life as protected as those who lead what's considered a normal personal life.  Simple enough, right?  We'll see.  Until then, I'll continue to be really frustrated. </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Feb 2018 04:22:59 +0000 barefooted comment 249225 at http://dagblog.com Sigh.  Thanks for the very http://dagblog.com/comment/249222#comment-249222 <a id="comment-249222"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/249221#comment-249221">If you are getting a result</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Sigh.  Thanks for the very helpful suggestion, AA, but I'm now a tad frustrated by what appears to be more interest in my posting snafu than the important article I posted.  Grrr x 2.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Feb 2018 03:37:21 +0000 barefooted comment 249222 at http://dagblog.com If you are getting a result http://dagblog.com/comment/249221#comment-249221 <a id="comment-249221"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/249208#comment-249208">Grrr.  Fixed the link, etc.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>If you are getting a result of  a post without content, just a title, this is what works for me:</p> <p>Go "back" on my browser and my full entry will still be there (works with both Firefox and Chrome.) Then carefully hover your cursor over the title already in the "In the News" column until you've caught the "Edit" link on the bottom of the empty post, and right click on it and <em>open it in a new tab. </em>Then just copy from the old tab window to the new empty post and hit publish on the latter and close out the former.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Feb 2018 03:29:20 +0000 artappraiser comment 249221 at http://dagblog.com Yep, I always do the latter http://dagblog.com/comment/249211#comment-249211 <a id="comment-249211"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/249210#comment-249210">I always just plan on the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yep, I always do the latter but keep forgetting about the former.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Feb 2018 02:08:12 +0000 barefooted comment 249211 at http://dagblog.com I always just plan on the http://dagblog.com/comment/249210#comment-249210 <a id="comment-249210"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/249208#comment-249208">Grrr.  Fixed the link, etc.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I always just plan on the first time failing since it almost always does. I make sure I copy the summary so I can paste it on the second try. And I never close the article so it's still up in a tab. It's a bit of a pain but not too bad if you plan for it.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Feb 2018 01:55:38 +0000 ocean-kat comment 249210 at http://dagblog.com Grrr.  Fixed the link, etc. http://dagblog.com/comment/249208#comment-249208 <a id="comment-249208"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/federal-appeals-court-civil-rights-act-protects-gay-workers-24572">Federal Appeals Court: Civil Rights Act Protects Gay Workers</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Grrr.  Fixed the link, etc. after hitting "save" originally ate it.  Again.</p> <p>If SCOTUS takes it up, it will become another case requiring the biting of nails for obvious reasons.  The Court right now doesn't seem the sort to be willing to expand <em>any</em> rights outside of the conservative context, but if a real difference is to be made in employment discrimination - outside of Congress - it will have to happen there.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 27 Feb 2018 01:23:32 +0000 barefooted comment 249208 at http://dagblog.com