dagblog - Comments for "Lovestruck Hero or Creepy Harasser?"

Yeah Missy, just think:

Richard Day — Thu, 01 Mar 2018 18:20:58 +0000

In reply to Lovestruck Hero or Creepy Harasser?

Yeah Missy, just think:

LUCY, YOU HAVE SOME SPLAININ TO DO!

hahahahah

I love 30's movies, when I am in the mood.

But Carole Lombard might be spanked on the behind; everyone in the scene giggles.

John Adams had a wife who would write to him everyday:

DO NOT FORGET THE WOMEN!

Well....A hundred and fifty years later, Women got the vote.

Progress and not perfection, as they say.

Bubbles are underrated.

barefooted — Thu, 01 Mar 2018 08:37:20 +0000

In reply to He heh heh - "Freak Out" -

Bubbles are underrated.

You have no reason to feel

barefooted — Thu, 01 Mar 2018 07:45:15 +0000

In reply to No worries. I think I'm

You have no reason to feel bad about bringing them up - you certainly weren't the first in the public sphere, nor the last. Politics is an ugly business, and having to discuss ugly things can make good people feel a bit tarnished even if they're simply stating fact. Note that "good people" is the operative part of the above sentence, as I was referring to you.

Since neither of us wants to further discuss Sanders on this thread, I'll leave it there.

No worries. I think I'm

ocean-kat — Thu, 01 Mar 2018 07:38:20 +0000

In reply to You're absolutely right, and

No worries. I think I'm overly sensitive on the subject. I didn't like bringing up the articles. I didn't want to do it. Throughout the primary I never brought up the subject. I hate doing the republicans work for them. I felt I was pushed into posting on it by Hal's relentless criticism of Hillary and aggressive questioning of me. Part of me feels bad for bringing it up and criticizing me for it is justified. It made me uncomfortable but that doesn't mean I won't do it again if I'm pushed so hard I feel I need to to push back.

You're absolutely right, and

barefooted — Thu, 01 Mar 2018 07:13:53 +0000

In reply to I'm not sure what you're

You're absolutely right, and I apologize for my bumbling attempt at humor.

Oh that was in pre-school in

PeraclesPlease — Thu, 01 Mar 2018 05:39:00 +0000

In reply to I hope you made them watch

Oh that was in pre-school in case they hit those "changes in life" early. Helped with their religious upbringing as well.

And don't think "make" we discuss these decisions as a family to make sure all concur.

I hope you made them watch

ocean-kat — Thu, 01 Mar 2018 05:33:33 +0000

In reply to Yes, I played Mean Girls and

I hope you made them watch Carrie before they went to the prom so they knew what to do if people were picking on them.

Yes, I played Mean Girls and

PeraclesPlease — Thu, 01 Mar 2018 05:19:40 +0000

In reply to Good observation IMO. I

Yes, I played Mean Girls and Fatal Attraction and Girl Interrupted and Show Girls to my daughters when young so they would have proper role models. Yhank God they now have some heroes in life. Oops, gotta run - Stepford Wives remake is playing on TV - still haven't seen it.

He heh heh - "Freak Out" -

PeraclesPlease — Thu, 01 Mar 2018 05:15:00 +0000

In reply to and now we're going to be

He heh heh - "Freak Out" - that's Zappa, no? It's like watching the 60's develop if you've already watched the 60's develop, or for you, familiar with thousands of years of art. The Hals of the world will spend their greying years wearing Dior & managing money market funds and seeing how productive their 3rd World work teams are this month, or giving 3 hour speeches about nothing to the wall like Castro. "I saw the best minds if my generation..."

BTW - Norton's no exception - many of the new writers thrust upon us are no grand thing. The content machine demands content, but not necessarily *good* content. Likes can be manyfactured as needed, much like Bitcoins. Come to think of it, why do we need both - isn't that our trading currency already?

Your adoring Lawrence Welk fan

I'm not sure what you're

ocean-kat — Wed, 28 Feb 2018 23:12:47 +0000

In reply to You might consider that

I'm not sure what you're saying here. I've never claimed Sanders did or wants to do any of the things he wrote about in his published sex based articles. All I've claimed is that those sex based articles would be extremely damaging to him if he was the democratic presidential candidate in the general election.

I'll also point out that I only brought up Sanders sex based articles when Hal asked me specifically why I think Sanders would have been a bad presidential candidate and likely would have lost. And then only after he badgered me when I avoided answering the question several times and mocked me for not answering. So in the end he got exactly what he wanted.