dagblog - Comments for "Here’s what Congress is stuffing into its $1.3 trillion spending bill" http://dagblog.com/link/here-s-what-congress-stuffing-its-13-trillion-spending-bill-24784 Comments for "Here’s what Congress is stuffing into its $1.3 trillion spending bill" en yes, he has no clue how this http://dagblog.com/comment/250997#comment-250997 <a id="comment-250997"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/250476#comment-250476">Yeah I heard it on TV. They</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>yes, he has no clue how this works, where the president is supposed to know something about the bill way before it passes, and not search for mulligans later because of faux A.D.D.:</p> <p> </p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Trump considering use of obscure law to cut some of $1.3 trillion funding package <a href="https://t.co/qUwSWvMlwl">https://t.co/qUwSWvMlwl</a> <a href="https://t.co/69fBgLvaND">pic.twitter.com/69fBgLvaND</a></p> — The Hill (@thehill) <a href="https://twitter.com/thehill/status/981406273475350528?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 4, 2018</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p> <p>And in this upside down world, believe it or not, Anne Coulter is, temporarily at least, speaking truth: <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/380612-ann-coulter-trump-is-a-shallow-lazy-ignoramus">Trump is a ‘shallow, lazy ignoramus’</a></p> </div></div></div> Wed, 04 Apr 2018 07:12:26 +0000 artappraiser comment 250997 at http://dagblog.com One thing I don't understand http://dagblog.com/comment/250478#comment-250478 <a id="comment-250478"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/250476#comment-250476">Yeah I heard it on TV. They</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>One thing I don't understand is that he often goes out of his way to sneak in some kind of supposed support for the DACA kids and blame the Dems for blocking a solution, he wants to be on both sides on that for some reason. His base probably is against doing anything, let them all be deported. I don't get what he's trying to do with that. Neither have I seen Schumer honestly explain where he thinks Trump really is at, what games Trump is playing, but that I could have just missed.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 23 Mar 2018 15:26:45 +0000 artappraiser comment 250478 at http://dagblog.com One thing I don't understand http://dagblog.com/comment/250479#comment-250479 <a id="comment-250479"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/250476#comment-250476">Yeah I heard it on TV. They</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>deleted duplicate</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 23 Mar 2018 15:24:45 +0000 artappraiser comment 250479 at http://dagblog.com Yeah I heard it on TV. They http://dagblog.com/comment/250476#comment-250476 <a id="comment-250476"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/250473#comment-250473">DJT just tweeted that he may</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah I heard it on TV. They pointed out that this threat is usually done before the a bill is passed and some Congresscritters already gone home as White House spokespeople have said it's a done deal. So if he did it that would shut down the government. </p> <p>He just realized he forgot to object to it in a Tweet for the record so he was just getting that in at the last minute in order to gaslight his base? <img alt="cheeky" height="23" src="http://cdn.ckeditor.com/4.5.6/full-all/plugins/smiley/images/tongue_smile.png" title="cheeky" width="23" /></p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@realDonaldTrump</a> this guy really has no clue how this works does he?</p> — Steve Hasso (@SteveHasso) <a href="https://twitter.com/SteveHasso/status/977188992700571650?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 23, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 23 Mar 2018 14:36:03 +0000 artappraiser comment 250476 at http://dagblog.com DJT just tweeted that he may http://dagblog.com/comment/250473#comment-250473 <a id="comment-250473"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/250467#comment-250467">SHHHHHH: Congress Snuck New</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>DJT just tweeted that he may veto it because it doesn’t deal with DACA or the wall.  Shocked!</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 23 Mar 2018 13:00:07 +0000 CVille Dem comment 250473 at http://dagblog.com SHHHHHH: Congress Snuck New http://dagblog.com/comment/250467#comment-250467 <a id="comment-250467"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/here-s-what-congress-stuffing-its-13-trillion-spending-bill-24784">Here’s what Congress is stuffing into its $1.3 trillion spending bill</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/congress-snuck-new-russia-sanctions-into-spending-bill">SHHHHHH: Congress Snuck New Russia Sanctions Into Spending Bill</a></p> <p><em>Congress wants to be sure that the United States keeps the pressure on Russia, with or without the president’s help.</em></p> <p>By Andrew Desiderio @ DailyBeast.com, March 22</p> <blockquote> <p>Buried in the <a href="http://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20180319/BILLS-115SAHR1625-RCP115-66.pdf">massive $1.3 trillion spending bill</a> that Congress is considering this week are strict new punishments against Russia, in what lawmakers and aides say is <a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/congress-braces-for-russia-sanctions-face-off-with-white-house-as-new-deadline-looms">a message to President Donald Trump</a> to reconsider his relaxed posture toward Moscow.</p> <p>The legislation, which Trump was always expected to sign, includes restrictions that bar many federal agencies from engaging financially or otherwise with the Kremlin and its backers on a number of fronts. Lawmakers from both parties viewed those provisions and others as an opportunity to <a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-administration-imposes-sweeping-new-sanctions-against-russia-over-election-meddling">enshrine new punishments</a> against <a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/keyword/vladimir-putin">Vladimir Putin’s regime</a> <a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/democrats-try-to-outflank-donald-trump-after-he-failed-to-implement-russia-sanctions">at a time </a><a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/democrats-try-to-outflank-donald-trump-after-he-failed-to-implement-russia-sanctions">when</a>the Trump administration <a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/top-ranking-armed-services-republican-hits-trump-on-russia-sanctions">has taken heat</a> for its <a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-administration-baffles-and-enrages-lawmakers-with-latest-punt-on-russia-sanctions">refusal</a> to immediately and fully implement mandatory sanctions and <a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/nsa-boss-seems-to-hit-trump-on-russia-putin-believes-little-price-to-pay-for-messing-with-us">other punishments</a>.[.....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Fri, 23 Mar 2018 02:42:59 +0000 artappraiser comment 250467 at http://dagblog.com Every bill takes compromise & http://dagblog.com/comment/250446#comment-250446 <a id="comment-250446"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/here-s-what-congress-stuffing-its-13-trillion-spending-bill-24784">Here’s what Congress is stuffing into its $1.3 trillion spending bill</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Every bill takes compromise &amp; there was plenty here, but at the end of the day Dems feel very good; so many of our priorities for the middle class are included. From opioid funding to rural broadband, from student loans to child care, this bill puts workers &amp; families first.</p> — Chuck Schumer (@SenSchumer) <a href="https://twitter.com/SenSchumer/status/976612333605748737?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 22, 2018</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Starting soon: <a href="https://twitter.com/NancyPelosi?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@NancyPelosi</a> joins <a href="https://twitter.com/SenSchumer?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SenSchumer</a> to talk about turning the tide &amp; highlight a number of priorities Dems have long fought for, including infrastructure, education, fighting the opioid crisis and more, that were included in the omnibus. <a href="https://t.co/LRuWKO2hkx">https://t.co/LRuWKO2hkx</a></p> — Senate Democrats (@SenateDems) <a href="https://twitter.com/SenateDems/status/976863561426395136?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 22, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Thu, 22 Mar 2018 19:20:38 +0000 artappraiser comment 250446 at http://dagblog.com