dagblog - Comments for "Cambridge Analytica, Big Picture: Our Lives Inside the Surveillance Machine" http://dagblog.com/link/cambridge-analytica-big-picture-our-lives-inside-surveillance-machine-24805 Comments for "Cambridge Analytica, Big Picture: Our Lives Inside the Surveillance Machine" en Cambridge Analytica and a http://dagblog.com/comment/250639#comment-250639 <a id="comment-250639"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/cambridge-analytica-big-picture-our-lives-inside-surveillance-machine-24805">Cambridge Analytica, Big Picture: Our Lives Inside the Surveillance Machine</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/04/02/cambridge-analytica-and-a-moral-reckoning-in-silicon-valley">Cambridge Analytica and a Moral Reckoning in Silicon Valley</a></p> <p><em>The latest Trump-adjacent scandal will have consequences far outside the White House.</em></p> <p>By <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/david-remnick" rel="author" title="David Remnick">David Remnick</a> @ NewYorker.com, for April 2 issue</p> <blockquote> <p>[....] The young innovators of Silicon Valley were not like the largely amoral barons of industry and finance. They were visionaries of virtue. Google adopted the slogan “Don’t Be Evil” (which morphed into “Do the Right Thing”). These young innovators were creating a seamlessly “connected” world; they were empowering the dispossessed with their tools and platforms. If you expressed any doubts about the inherent goodness of technology, you didn’t “get it.” And to fail to get it was to be gloomy, a Luddite, and three-quarters dead.</p> <p>The era of sanctimony has, in the past few years, given way to a dawning skepticism. Even as Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, and Facebook continue to reap immense riches, they have faced questions that could not be answered with flippant declarations of rectitude: Is Google the Standard Oil of search engines, a monopoly best broken up? Does Apple, which has a valuation nearly three times greater than ExxonMobil’s, exploit factory workers in China? Why is Facebook—“the biggest surveillance-based enterprise in the history of mankind,” in the <a href="https://www.lrb.co.uk/v39/n16/john-lanchester/you-are-the-product" target="_blank">memorable phrase</a> of the critic and novelist John Lanchester—allowed to exploit the work of “content creators” while doing so little to reward them financially? [....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Mon, 26 Mar 2018 08:20:58 +0000 artappraiser comment 250639 at http://dagblog.com The Madness of Crowds or of http://dagblog.com/comment/250552#comment-250552 <a id="comment-250552"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/cambridge-analytica-big-picture-our-lives-inside-surveillance-machine-24805">Cambridge Analytica, Big Picture: Our Lives Inside the Surveillance Machine</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The Madness of Crowds or of crowd control?</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 25 Mar 2018 02:54:13 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 250552 at http://dagblog.com