dagblog - Comments for "Unintended Consequences" http://dagblog.com/link/unintended-consequences-24974 Comments for "Unintended Consequences" en Or I could borrow from many http://dagblog.com/comment/251553#comment-251553 <a id="comment-251553"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/251546#comment-251546">This response is an attempt</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The above is just borrowing from many poets and playwrights who observed that It takes many years to build up trust but only an afternoon to throw it all away.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 19 Apr 2018 00:34:06 +0000 moat comment 251553 at http://dagblog.com This response is an attempt http://dagblog.com/comment/251546#comment-251546 <a id="comment-251546"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/251455#comment-251455">And your response is that you</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>This response is an attempt to distance himself from those friends.<br /> Whatever falls out from this connection, Hannity is no longer a player.<br /> He just wrote himself out of the script.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 18 Apr 2018 23:03:11 +0000 moat comment 251546 at http://dagblog.com Same opinion in a less legal, http://dagblog.com/comment/251483#comment-251483 <a id="comment-251483"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/251477#comment-251477">Constitutional law expert</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Same opinion in a less legal, more eloquent, (and to me, more convincing) frame:</p> <p><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/michael-cohen-and-the-end-stage-of-the-trump-presidency">Michael Cohen and the End Stage of the Trump Presidency</a> by Adam Davidson @ NewYorker.com, April 14 (yes, way back on Saturday unless it's a typo!)</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 17 Apr 2018 06:56:43 +0000 artappraiser comment 251483 at http://dagblog.com "it was such a minor http://dagblog.com/comment/251481#comment-251481 <a id="comment-251481"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/251464#comment-251464">Unintended consequences</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>"it was such a minor relationship" - I think he got that excuse from Roy Moore. Wondering if that's a a Fraudian slit?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 17 Apr 2018 06:04:10 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 251481 at http://dagblog.com Of course, the most & the http://dagblog.com/comment/251480#comment-251480 <a id="comment-251480"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/251465#comment-251465">How does this work when the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Of course, the most &amp; the best. It's a combination of The People's Court/Judge Judy and The Sopranos - all like on TV (though skipping any of the serious stuff). I'm rather tired of being on this bastard's RealityTV, and I will hold no end of a grudge against the party that continues to enable it (that includes you, weasel Ryan, your sneaky Gollum-in-the-shadows Nunes and Supreme Court-stealer McConnell - rule of law my ass).</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 17 Apr 2018 06:02:18 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 251480 at http://dagblog.com Constitutional law expert http://dagblog.com/comment/251477#comment-251477 <a id="comment-251477"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/unintended-consequences-24974">Unintended Consequences</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Constitutional law expert Noah Feldman @ Bloomberg.com:</p> <p><a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-04-16/trump-cohen-and-mueller-a-turning-point-in-the-presidency">Trump Should Be Worried by Cohen Probe. Really Worried.</a></p> <p><em>Federal prosecutors can dog him for the rest of his presidency, and he has no power to fire them</em>.</p> <p>April 16, 12:28 PM EDT</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 17 Apr 2018 05:11:57 +0000 artappraiser comment 251477 at http://dagblog.com Judge Wood should not get all http://dagblog.com/comment/251473#comment-251473 <a id="comment-251473"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/251444#comment-251444">Jake Tapper has it right:</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Judge Wood should not get all the credit, according to Bertrand, who was in the courtroom:</p> <p> </p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>A note about this: Judge Wood was prepared to let Ryan give her the name of Cohen’s third client under seal. At that point, an attorney for the NYT and CNN approached the podium and convinced her that the press (&amp;public) should know. She agreed. He played pivotal role here. <a href="https://t.co/nbJUaAw4Ys">https://t.co/nbJUaAw4Ys</a></p> — Natasha Bertrand (@NatashaBertrand) <a href="https://twitter.com/NatashaBertrand/status/986059324836413445?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 17, 2018</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 17 Apr 2018 03:59:16 +0000 artappraiser comment 251473 at http://dagblog.com Quite interesting to see what http://dagblog.com/comment/251469#comment-251469 <a id="comment-251469"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/251446#comment-251446">Michael Cohen has never</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Quite interesting to see what (Atty./Prof) Seth Abramson saw in the very same Hannity tweet, hah:</p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>In one fell swoop, Hannity:<br /><br /> 1 Says Cohen lied to a federal court about being his lawyer<br /> 2 Says any docs about him the feds seized aren't privileged<br /> 3 Makes himself a witness for Mueller<br /> 4 Revealed an undisclosed on-air conflict of interest<br /> 5 Contradicts what he said on the radio <a href="https://t.co/ZznOALMULq">https://t.co/ZznOALMULq</a></p> — Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) <a href="https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/985987306925387776?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 16, 2018</a></blockquote> </div> </div></div></div> Tue, 17 Apr 2018 02:41:16 +0000 artappraiser comment 251469 at http://dagblog.com How does this work when the http://dagblog.com/comment/251465#comment-251465 <a id="comment-251465"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/unintended-consequences-24974">Unintended Consequences</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>How does this work when the president himself tells reporters to call “my attorney,” meaning Cohen? <a href="https://t.co/Rvu2MW0dTS">https://t.co/Rvu2MW0dTS</a></p> — Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) <a href="https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/986052473096982535?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 17, 2018</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">WH continues remarkable effort of trying to distance Trump from Cohen. Hogan Gidley on <a href="https://twitter.com/AC360?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ac360</a> says Cohen is one of “many” Trump lawyers. Earlier today, Sanders: “I believe they've still got some ongoing things, but the President has a large number of attorneys, as you know.”</p> — Manu Raju (@mkraju) <a href="https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/986047726658998272?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 17, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 17 Apr 2018 02:01:01 +0000 artappraiser comment 251465 at http://dagblog.com Unintended consequences http://dagblog.com/comment/251464#comment-251464 <a id="comment-251464"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/unintended-consequences-24974">Unintended Consequences</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Unintended consequences indeed:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">WTW (what the what) <a href="https://t.co/430tKhoVCD">https://t.co/430tKhoVCD</a></p> — Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) <a href="https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/986057296781500416?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 17, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">WATCH: Dershowitz confronts Hannity on-air over Trump lawyer representation <a href="https://t.co/wLOt3rq9pl">https://t.co/wLOt3rq9pl</a> <a href="https://t.co/P0BZcvWTt0">pic.twitter.com/P0BZcvWTt0</a></p> — The Hill (@thehill) <a href="https://twitter.com/thehill/status/986055914670252033?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 17, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 17 Apr 2018 01:49:33 +0000 artappraiser comment 251464 at http://dagblog.com