dagblog - Comments for "U.S.-Led Coalition Launches Attacks On Syria" http://dagblog.com/link/us-led-coalition-launches-attacks-syria-24975 Comments for "U.S.-Led Coalition Launches Attacks On Syria" en Graham calls Syria strikes a http://dagblog.com/comment/251460#comment-251460 <a id="comment-251460"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/us-led-coalition-launches-attacks-syria-24975">U.S.-Led Coalition Launches Attacks On Syria</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://www.politico.com/story/2018/04/16/trump-syria-missiles-lindsey-graham-526286">Graham calls Syria strikes a 'major step backwards' for Trump</a></p> <p><em>‘We don’t have a strategy about why Syria matters,’ the South Carolina senator says.</em></p> <p>By Christiano Lima @ Politico.com, 04/16/2018</p> <blockquote> <p>[....] Graham scrutinized the round of air strikes, carried out Friday night in response to a suspected poison gas attack against civilians near Damascus, which he framed as dealing an insufficient blow to Syrian leader Bashar Assad, whom U.S. officials have accused of deploying chemical weapons.</p> <p>Asked about the president's response to the attacks in Syria during a radio interview on "The Hugh Hewitt Show," Graham griped that his actions "didn’t lay a glove on Assad’s capabilities to wage war."</p> <p>"We’re becoming the chemical weapons police," Graham said. "We don’t have a strategy about why Syria matters."</p> <p>He added: "The military strike itself was a tactical response well short of what I thought was justified. So he’s been a good commander-in-chief in general, but this is a major step backwards." [....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Tue, 17 Apr 2018 01:25:23 +0000 artappraiser comment 251460 at http://dagblog.com Trump's French flip on Syria http://dagblog.com/comment/251418#comment-251418 <a id="comment-251418"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/us-led-coalition-launches-attacks-syria-24975">U.S.-Led Coalition Launches Attacks On Syria</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://www.axios.com/donald-trump-emmanuel-macron-syria-flip-reversal-long-term-e54523b9-fdd2-4871-b1e0-f2b0dc2b816f.html?utm_source=sidebar">Trump's French flip on Syria</a></p> <p>By Jonathan Swan @ Axios.com, 1 hr. ago</p> <blockquote> <p>French President Emmanuel Macron claimed in a television interview that France has convinced President Trump that it is "necessary" to remain in Syria "long-term," according to the AFP.</p> <p><strong>Why this matters:</strong> If Trump follows through on this alleged commitment to Macron, it would be one of the biggest and most abrupt foreign policy reversals in his presidency. Trump has demanded for months — over the objections of his national security team — that his administration withdraw U.S. troops from Syria [.....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Sun, 15 Apr 2018 22:08:25 +0000 artappraiser comment 251418 at http://dagblog.com Nikki Haley: New round of http://dagblog.com/comment/251417#comment-251417 <a id="comment-251417"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/us-led-coalition-launches-attacks-syria-24975">U.S.-Led Coalition Launches Attacks On Syria</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://www.axios.com/nikki-haley-assad-syria-chemical-weapons-program-11544bf9-26af-476d-8798-43c6aa4ce7f7.html">Nikki Haley: New round of Russia sanctions are coming Monday</a></p> <p>By Erica Pandey @ Axios.com, 8 hrs. ago</p> <blockquote> <p>U.S. ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley said on CBS' Face the Nation that the Treasury Department will announce new sanctions against Russia tomorrow. According to Haley, the sanctions are set to "go directly to any sort of [Russian] companies that were dealing with equipment related to Assad and chemical weapons use." [....]</p> </blockquote> <p>A reminder of  the sanctions that Treasury imposed April 6:</p> <p><a href="http://dagblog.com/link/russian-oligarchs-sanctioned-treasury-malign-activity-24915">RUSSIAN OLIGARCHS SANCTIONED BY U.S. TREASURY FOR "WORLDWIDE MALIGN ACTIVITY"</a> </p> </div></div></div> Sun, 15 Apr 2018 22:05:37 +0000 artappraiser comment 251417 at http://dagblog.com Richard Engel usually has his http://dagblog.com/comment/251402#comment-251402 <a id="comment-251402"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/251401#comment-251401">Sounds like the correct</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Richard Engel usually has his finger on the pulse of the situation, since he's been immersed in it for so long.</p> <p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-tries-to-appear-strong-in-syria-even-as-he-plans-to-withdraw/2018/04/14/4bb75fe6-400f-11e8-8d53-eba0ed2371cc_story.html?noredirect=on&amp;utm_term=.f3af3501b53d">Greg Jaffe at WaPo</a> seems spot-on, as well:</p> <blockquote> <p>Trump is betting that periodic shows of American force — in the form of missiles and fighter jets — can persuade Assad and his backers not to use chemical weapons. He’s adopted a similar strategy with regard to North Korea and Iran, where he is wagering that threats of American firepower can produce more pliant behavior. But the problem in Syria is that each time Assad is accused of using chemical weapons, Trump has to raise the stakes with a bigger show of force or risk looking feckless.</p> </blockquote> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 14 Apr 2018 22:39:49 +0000 barefooted comment 251402 at http://dagblog.com Sounds like the correct http://dagblog.com/comment/251401#comment-251401 <a id="comment-251401"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/us-led-coalition-launches-attacks-syria-24975">U.S.-Led Coalition Launches Attacks On Syria</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Sounds like the correct analysis to me:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Assad wasn't targeted. His air force remains intact. US efforts taken to prevent escalation with Russia. So the message seems to be that the Syrian regime can continue its war and Assad still gets to win, just not by using chemical weapons. <a href="https://t.co/KB8pjDVjqw">https://t.co/KB8pjDVjqw</a></p> — Richard Engel (@RichardEngel) <a href="https://twitter.com/RichardEngel/status/985131315518427137?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 14, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 14 Apr 2018 19:20:06 +0000 artappraiser comment 251401 at http://dagblog.com Pentagon reports increase in http://dagblog.com/comment/251399#comment-251399 <a id="comment-251399"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/us-led-coalition-launches-attacks-syria-24975">U.S.-Led Coalition Launches Attacks On Syria</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/383169-pentagon-reports-increase-in-russian-trolls-since-syria-strike">Pentagon reports increase in Russian trolls since Syria strike</a></p> <p>@ TheHill.com - 04/14/18 11:50 AM EDT</p> <blockquote> <p>[....] “The Russian disinformation campaign has already begun. There has been a 2,000 percent increase in Russian trolls in the last 24 hours," chief Pentagon spokeswoman Dana White said in a briefing on Saturday. [....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Sat, 14 Apr 2018 19:11:05 +0000 artappraiser comment 251399 at http://dagblog.com Infowars's Alex Jones blasts http://dagblog.com/comment/251396#comment-251396 <a id="comment-251396"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/us-led-coalition-launches-attacks-syria-24975">U.S.-Led Coalition Launches Attacks On Syria</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/383141-infowars-alex-jones-cries-over-trump-airstrikes-hes-crapping">Infowars's Alex Jones blasts Trump over airstrikes: 'He's crapping all over us'</a></p> <p>@ TheHill.com - 04/14/18 12:06 AM EDT</p> <p><a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/media/383147-conservatives-trump-supporters-slam-trump-over-syria-missile-strike">Trump supporters slam decision to launch strikes against Syria</a></p> <p>@ TheHill.com,  04/14/18 08:08 AM EDT</p> <p><a href="https://www.politico.com/story/2018/04/13/trump-supporters-syria-strikes-523061">Trump supporters rip decision to strike Syria</a></p> <p>@ Politco.com, 04/13/2018 11:43 PM EDT</p> <p><a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/383130-gop-rep-us-constitution-doesnt-give-president-authority-to-strike-syria">GOP rep (Massie of KY): US Constitution doesn't give president 'authority to strike Syria'</a></p> <p>@ The Hill.com, 04/13/18 09:39 PM EDT</p> <p><a href="https://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Syria-reaction-Republican-establishment-Democrats-12834181.php">Trump draws praise from GOP establishment, angers base and Democrats after Syria strike</a></p> <p>@  SFGATE,  Saturday, April 14, 2018</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 14 Apr 2018 18:53:40 +0000 artappraiser comment 251396 at http://dagblog.com .@CharlesHurt: "This is not http://dagblog.com/comment/251390#comment-251390 <a id="comment-251390"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/us-led-coalition-launches-attacks-syria-24975">U.S.-Led Coalition Launches Attacks On Syria</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">.<a href="https://twitter.com/CharlesHurt?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@CharlesHurt</a>: "This is not what <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@realDonaldTrump</a> got elected for. He got elected by who found his message very resonating about getting out of these sorts of situations." <a href="https://t.co/GPXFDYWJUu">pic.twitter.com/GPXFDYWJUu</a></p> — Fox News (@FoxNews) <a href="https://twitter.com/FoxNews/status/985196415273127937?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 14, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 14 Apr 2018 17:28:32 +0000 artappraiser comment 251390 at http://dagblog.com IRNA in English has this http://dagblog.com/comment/251384#comment-251384 <a id="comment-251384"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/251383#comment-251383">Russian defense ministry says</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>IRNA in English has this short piece (the brevity is fairly standard for them, it's like an old-fashioned wire service):</p> <p><a href="http://www.irna.ir/en/News/82885659">Iran strongly condemns US attack on Syria</a></p> <blockquote> <p>Tehran, April 14, IRNA – Iran's Foreign Ministry on Saturday strongly condemned the overnight attack by the US on some Syrian targets.</p> <p>'The attack is the blatant violation of international laws, as well as ignoring the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Syria,' said Bahram Qasemi, the spokesman for Iran's Foreign Ministry [....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Sat, 14 Apr 2018 05:11:29 +0000 artappraiser comment 251384 at http://dagblog.com Russian defense ministry says http://dagblog.com/comment/251383#comment-251383 <a id="comment-251383"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/us-led-coalition-launches-attacks-syria-24975">U.S.-Led Coalition Launches Attacks On Syria</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Russian defense ministry says missiles “didn’t enter Russian air defense’s zone of responsibility” in Syria. Guess that translates as no need to retaliate. <a href="https://t.co/r2OQgjXH8w">https://t.co/r2OQgjXH8w</a></p> — Leonid Ragozin (@leonidragozin) <a href="https://twitter.com/leonidragozin/status/985013313259044864?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 14, 2018</a></blockquote> </div> <p>This is also at the English version of Tass, the current headline on the home page:</p> <p><a href="http://tass.com/defense/999720">Top brass: Missiles of US, allies steered clear of Russian air defenses</a></p> <p>April 14, 7:34UTC+3</p> <p><em>The United States, France and Britain have launched a joint operation against Syria</em></p> <blockquote> <p>MOSCOW, April 14. /TASS/. Not a single missile of those launched against Damascus ventured into the zones of Russian air defenses in Tartus and Hmeymim, the Russian Defense Ministry said on Saturday.</p> <p>"None of the cruise missiles launched by the United States and its allies entered the zones of Russian air defenses around Tartus and Hmeymim," the Defense Ministry said [....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Sat, 14 Apr 2018 05:04:40 +0000 artappraiser comment 251383 at http://dagblog.com