dagblog - Comments for "It&#039;s Fine To Destroy Wells Fargo" http://dagblog.com/its-fine-destroy-wells-fargo-25017 Comments for "It's Fine To Destroy Wells Fargo" en I love it! Punish the banks http://dagblog.com/comment/251637#comment-251637 <a id="comment-251637"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/251632#comment-251632">Well, I’m doing my part.  My</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I love it! Punish the banks with prepayment risk!</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 21 Apr 2018 14:20:30 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 251637 at http://dagblog.com Well, I’m doing my part.  My http://dagblog.com/comment/251632#comment-251632 <a id="comment-251632"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/its-fine-destroy-wells-fargo-25017">It&#039;s Fine To Destroy Wells Fargo</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well, I’m doing my part.  My only experience with Wells Fargo is an interest-free loan for $10,000.  I have all the payments on automatic, and will have it paid back before the 36 month deadline so I truly got the best deal possible for my new HVAC system that unexpectedly went south last summer.  I wonder how many people they gave similar loans to who didn’t understand the strict terms.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 21 Apr 2018 12:10:30 +0000 CVille Dem comment 251632 at http://dagblog.com I also have a hard time http://dagblog.com/comment/251626#comment-251626 <a id="comment-251626"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/251622#comment-251622">I kinda missed out by not</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I also have a hard time buying stocks in the face of just desserts.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 21 Apr 2018 01:23:46 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 251626 at http://dagblog.com I kinda missed out by not http://dagblog.com/comment/251622#comment-251622 <a id="comment-251622"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/its-fine-destroy-wells-fargo-25017">It&#039;s Fine To Destroy Wells Fargo</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I kinda missed out by not becoming a shareholder of Citibank when it hit 97 cents at the  final götterdämmerung of the last Republican administration. </p> <p>Was hoping it would hit zero.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 20 Apr 2018 23:22:18 +0000 NCD comment 251622 at http://dagblog.com The fine is relative! What http://dagblog.com/comment/251592#comment-251592 <a id="comment-251592"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/its-fine-destroy-wells-fargo-25017">It&#039;s Fine To Destroy Wells Fargo</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>And the fine is quite relative! What struck me reading <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/19/business/wells-fargo-cfpb-penalty.html?&amp;hp&amp;action=click&amp;pgtype=Homepage&amp;clickSource=story-heading&amp;module=first-column-region&amp;region=top-news&amp;WT.nav=top-news"> the Times' April 19 news story on it </a>is this line:</p> <blockquote> <p>Wells Fargo, for example, said last week that it <a href="https://www.wellsfargo.com/assets/pdf/about/investor-relations/earnings/first-quarter-2018-earnings.pdf">earned</a> $5.9 billion in the first three months of the year.</p> </blockquote> <p> Less than a month of earnings....</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 20 Apr 2018 17:13:06 +0000 artappraiser comment 251592 at http://dagblog.com Good post. http://dagblog.com/comment/251591#comment-251591 <a id="comment-251591"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/its-fine-destroy-wells-fargo-25017">It&#039;s Fine To Destroy Wells Fargo</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Good post.</p> <p>If Wells Fargo ceased to exist, its assets would continue to exist. They would just have new, smaller owners: a number of smaller banks</p> <p>The problem with Too Big to Fail is that the whole enterprise comes crashing down at once if the institution fails, so that the healthy parts of the business become insolvent because the toxic ones are. Splitting up an arguably criminal enterprise like Wells Fargo lets the sound parts of the former company continue to exist and meet their obligations (although without access to the same economies of scale), while letting the deadwood fall.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 20 Apr 2018 16:56:52 +0000 Doctor Cleveland comment 251591 at http://dagblog.com