dagblog - Comments for "Diamond &amp; Silk Lie to Congress, Claim They Never Took Trump Campaign Money" http://dagblog.com/link/diamond-silk-lie-congress-claim-they-never-took-trump-campaign-money-25061 Comments for "Diamond & Silk Lie to Congress, Claim They Never Took Trump Campaign Money" en This graph says it all: http://dagblog.com/comment/252090#comment-252090 <a id="comment-252090"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/diamond-silk-lie-congress-claim-they-never-took-trump-campaign-money-25061">Diamond &amp; Silk Lie to Congress, Claim They Never Took Trump Campaign Money</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>This graph says it all: Ratings--Trolling wins everytime: yuge; monetize-able:</p> <figure class="image"><img alt="" height="449" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/5E2BPhfxo24zADvxyDQ7L3uD5Fc=/0x0:1078x806/920x0/filters:focal(0x0:1078x806):format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/10753145/Screen_Shot_2018_04_30_at_4.19.30_PM.png" width="600" /><figcaption>Google searches of Diamond and Silk compared to Kellyanne Conway and John Kelly<br /> over the past 30 days. Google Trends</figcaption></figure><p>from<a href="https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/5/1/17300120/diamond-and-silk-facebook-trump-youtube-congress-mark-zuckerberg-censored"> Diamond and Silk, Fox &amp; Friends’ favorite black Trump supporters, explained</a> @ Vox.com, May 1</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 01 May 2018 22:27:55 +0000 artappraiser comment 252090 at http://dagblog.com Yes, you're probably right.  http://dagblog.com/comment/251963#comment-251963 <a id="comment-251963"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/251961#comment-251961">I don&#039;t think that&#039;s what it</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yes, you're probably right.  Unfortunately, the fact that they're such obvious fools just intensifies the already stereotypical view that most Republicans seem to have of black women and gives them the chance to use them no matter how they're perceived ... as outspoken women who are bravely defending their love for Trump or as simply crazy, over-the-top ladies who exemplify black folks but just happen to really like Trump.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 28 Apr 2018 20:03:30 +0000 barefooted comment 251963 at http://dagblog.com I don't think that's what it http://dagblog.com/comment/251961#comment-251961 <a id="comment-251961"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/251959#comment-251959">Of course they don&#039;t, they&#039;re</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I don't think that's what it's about in this case. They use them because they're black. They don't take them seriously because Diamond and Silk are fools that don't deserve to be taken seriously.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 28 Apr 2018 19:37:17 +0000 ocean-kat comment 251961 at http://dagblog.com You are correct, they are http://dagblog.com/comment/251960#comment-251960 <a id="comment-251960"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/251958#comment-251958">I doubt it. They might use</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You are correct, they are willing to use the two women.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 28 Apr 2018 18:00:52 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 251960 at http://dagblog.com Of course they don't, they're http://dagblog.com/comment/251959#comment-251959 <a id="comment-251959"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/251958#comment-251958">I doubt it. They might use</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Of course they don't, they're black women.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 28 Apr 2018 17:51:34 +0000 barefooted comment 251959 at http://dagblog.com I doubt it. They might use http://dagblog.com/comment/251958#comment-251958 <a id="comment-251958"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/251957#comment-251957">Trump supporters take them</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I doubt it. They might use them as cover for their racism or to pretend their conservative ideology cares about minorities or the poor. But I don't think they really take them seriously.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 28 Apr 2018 17:48:48 +0000 ocean-kat comment 251958 at http://dagblog.com Trump supporters take them http://dagblog.com/comment/251957#comment-251957 <a id="comment-251957"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/251956#comment-251956">I saw that, too. But in the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Trump supporters take them seriously.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 28 Apr 2018 17:40:14 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 251957 at http://dagblog.com I saw that, too. But in the http://dagblog.com/comment/251956#comment-251956 <a id="comment-251956"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/251954#comment-251954">Diamond and Silk accepted</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I saw that, too. But in the end, I see few taking them seriously, mostly see through their shtick as comedy routine looking out for #1 playing troll, crying controversy and riling for eventual profit. And that the Congressional GOP made themselves look like fools for trying to take advantage of their claim that Facebook et. al. is censoring pro-Trump voices, when in reality all they did is give them more face time and brand recognition. And I think most political people see that. Because the gals do the classic troll thing, that's their shtick.  Taking money from anybody would also be their shtick. Not a hell of a lot of ideology there if you've tried to check them out, all just trolling Trump, they don't really give many reasons for supporting him.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 28 Apr 2018 13:31:49 +0000 artappraiser comment 251956 at http://dagblog.com Diamond and Silk accepted http://dagblog.com/comment/251954#comment-251954 <a id="comment-251954"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/diamond-silk-lie-congress-claim-they-never-took-trump-campaign-money-25061">Diamond &amp; Silk Lie to Congress, Claim They Never Took Trump Campaign Money</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Diamond and Silk accepted money to do an ad for a white supremacist running for Paul Ryan’s abandoned seat.</p> <p><a href="https://www.theroot.com/diamond-and-silk-broke-about-a-million-laws-thursday-in-1825610241">https://www.theroot.com/diamond-and-silk-broke-about-a-million-laws-thursday-in-1825610241</a></p> <p>We know WH they are.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 28 Apr 2018 13:20:09 +0000 rmrd0000 comment 251954 at http://dagblog.com compare and contrast http://dagblog.com/comment/251935#comment-251935 <a id="comment-251935"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/diamond-silk-lie-congress-claim-they-never-took-trump-campaign-money-25061">Diamond &amp; Silk Lie to Congress, Claim They Never Took Trump Campaign Money</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>compare and contrast</p> <p><img alt="" height="169" src="http://i2.cdn.turner.com/money/dam/assets/180426161426-diamond-and-silk-hearing-780x439.jpg" style="float:left" width="300" /></p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p><img alt="" height="188" src="https://theibtaurisblog.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/i-love-lucy.png" style="float:left" width="250" /></p> </div></div></div> Fri, 27 Apr 2018 20:49:03 +0000 artappraiser comment 251935 at http://dagblog.com