dagblog - Comments for "60&#039;s Minimalism: the less said the better" http://dagblog.com/link/60s-minimalism-less-said-better-25274 Comments for "60's Minimalism: the less said the better" en One of those "if you can read http://dagblog.com/comment/253186#comment-253186 <a id="comment-253186"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/253185#comment-253185">Hell Peracles...</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>One of those "if you can read this pick me up &amp; put me back on my barstool" t-shirts. As written for a whole decade.</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 31 May 2018 08:14:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 253186 at http://dagblog.com Hell Peracles... http://dagblog.com/comment/253185#comment-253185 <a id="comment-253185"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/60s-minimalism-less-said-better-25274">60&#039;s Minimalism: the less said the better</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><strong>Hell Peracles... <img alt="surprise" height="23" src="http://cdn.ckeditor.com/4.5.6/full-all/plugins/smiley/images/omg_smile.png" title="surprise" width="23" /></strong></p> <p>I couldn't even make out the first paragraph.</p> <blockquote> <p><em>˙ƃuᴉʇuᴉoddɐsᴉp ʎlǝʇɐɯᴉʇln ɥƃnoɥʇ 'lnɟǝdoɥ ʇnq ǝʌᴉɐu sɐʍ ɐᴉdoʇn ǝʌol-ǝǝɹɟ ɐ ɟo uoᴉsᴉʌ s,uǝɹplᴉɥɔ ɹǝʍolɟ ǝsǝɥ┴ ˙sǝᴉddᴉɥ ǝɥʇ ǝɹǝʍ ʎǝɥ┴ ˙ʇsǝM ǝɥʇ ɟo sƃuᴉddɐɹʇ ǝɥʇ puǝɔsuɐɹʇ plnoʍ ʇɐɥʇ ǝɹnʇnɟ ɐ uᴉ ǝlqɐɹɐdǝsuᴉ sɐ ǝɟᴉl puɐ ʇɹɐ pǝuᴉƃɐɯᴉ puɐ 'sǝɔuɐʇsqns ɔᴉlǝpǝɥɔʎsd ɟo ǝɔuǝnlɟuᴉ ǝɥʇ ɹǝpun sɯɹoɟ ʇɹɐ ʍǝu pǝʇuǝʌuᴉ 'sʇnɔɹᴉɐɥ puɐ ɹɐʍ ʇsuᴉɐƃɐ pǝʇloʌǝɹ ʎǝɥ┴</em></p> </blockquote> <p>======<br /> ~OGD~</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 31 May 2018 07:12:21 +0000 oldenGoldenDecoy comment 253185 at http://dagblog.com Yeah, I kept waiting for a http://dagblog.com/comment/253158#comment-253158 <a id="comment-253158"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/253142#comment-253142">Lets say it&#039;s 1979 and I&#039;m</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, I kept waiting for a story to emerge, and finally published it from bemusement and bewilderment.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 30 May 2018 22:35:24 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 253158 at http://dagblog.com Lets say it's 1979 and I'm http://dagblog.com/comment/253142#comment-253142 <a id="comment-253142"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/60s-minimalism-less-said-better-25274">60&#039;s Minimalism: the less said the better</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Lets say it's 1978 and I'm still a T.A. for Art History 102 and this was a student's submission for an essay assignment to write on what you wish. I'd give it a D-. That would be when I was in a sympathetic mood.</p> <p>What the fuck BBC News? Is the editor on vacation here? Scary, scary that the BBC News has chosen to publish this.</p> <p>You rarely see me pan an article this strongly because: I really think it's this bad: he looks at two articles about two shows and then writes a bunch of gibberish while stoned.</p> <p>I googled the author quickly and<a href="https://hyperallergic.com/author/devon-vanhouten-maldonado/"> from that </a>I'd like to tell the author that from that it looks like this hipsters should be careful about throwing stones at glass hippies that were his direct ancestors. Don't like such a flippant judgment? Well then stop doing it yourself in your "writing."</p> <p>Edit to add: there's actually a lot of good millennial writers on cultural history out there, so I know that their education has not been this dumb;  this guy shames them, that it was published is an outrage or else a super hack job by an editor, whatever the reason it is: gibberish.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 30 May 2018 19:27:35 +0000 artappraiser comment 253142 at http://dagblog.com