dagblog - Comments for "It Was Supposed to Be an Unbiased Study of Drinking. They Wanted to Call It ‘Cheers.’" http://dagblog.com/link/it-was-supposed-be-unbiased-study-drinking-they-wanted-call-it-cheers-25405 Comments for "It Was Supposed to Be an Unbiased Study of Drinking. They Wanted to Call It ‘Cheers.’" en meanwhile, bigger and better http://dagblog.com/comment/253925#comment-253925 <a id="comment-253925"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/it-was-supposed-be-unbiased-study-drinking-they-wanted-call-it-cheers-25405">It Was Supposed to Be an Unbiased Study of Drinking. They Wanted to Call It ‘Cheers.’</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>meanwhile, bigger and better news:</p> <p><a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/06/a-landmark-study-in-the-origins-of-alcoholism/563372/"> A Landmark Study on the Origins of Alcoholism</a></p> <p>By Ed Yong @ TheAtlantic.com, June 21</p> <p><em>By studying rats in a smarter way, scientists are finally learning something useful about why some drinkers become addicted and others don’t.</em></p> </div></div></div> Fri, 22 Jun 2018 00:13:54 +0000 artappraiser comment 253925 at http://dagblog.com